People and Communities Factors Influence Awareness of Internet of Everything (Dissertation Sample)

People and Communities Factors Influence Awareness of Internet of Everything
Name
Institutional Affiliation
People and Communities Factors Influence Awareness of Internet of Everything
In smart cities, the quality of life of the citizens is influenced by the projects undertaken by the cities. The aim of the projects is to also to nurture more knowledgeable and educated citizens who are ready to take part in the city’s activities. In addition, the members of the smart city are able to take part in running the city and become active users of the city facilities through the city’s initiatives. In case they play an important role, they may have the chance to engage with the enterprise to the extent that they can determine the effort to be a success or a failure. It is undeniable that it is paramount to not to refer to members of the city individuals, communities, as well as groups and their respective wants and needs within cities. In order to balance the needs of different communities, people and communities require smart cities initiatives to achieve this objective.
Digital Divide
Barzilai-Nahon (2006), defines digital divide as the gap between those who access to modern ICT and those who have restricted access. Those people who make decisions are criticized because of their way of the way they approach the issue of digital divide from a cost and fast output perspectives instead of using thoughtful examination. Policy makers should particularly do a thoughtful analysis of the purpose of the toll, the observation level and the technique of approaching data (Barzilai-Nahon, 2006). On the other side, Norris argues that the digital divide is about more than rich versus poor. She finds out a global divide between the haves as well as have-nots within each country and a democratic divide, which splits those who do and do not use internet resources to take part in public life (Norris, 2001). Similarly, e-commerce and e-government applications have made key influences in their respective sectors. It is undeniable that in spite of numerous similarities, the two phenomena follow quite separate and distinct paths CITATION Sch09 \l 1033 (Scholl, Barzilai-Nahon, Ann, Popova, & Re, 2009). Lastly, Servon makes it clear that the digital divide is one sign of persistent poverty. Therefore, treating this symptom may one way or the other cure the disease CITATION Ser08 \l 1033 (Servon , 2008). This factor plays a key role on trying to curb the gap between those who access the digital world and those who do not.
Information and Community Gatekeepers
Barzilai-Nahon (2009), defines information as facts that can affect behavior, outcome, or even a decision. Additionally, he defines community gatekeeping as the main trends and analytical frameworks relating to keeping in library and science, management of information systems, law, communication, public affairs, political science, as well as sociology. It has been noted that there is a lack of analytical tools to respond to two important phenomena including the dynamism of gatekeeping and essential role of those subjected to a gatekeeping process. In simple terms, gatekeeping is the process through which data is filtered for dissemination. This factor plays a significant role in making policymakers understand the key importance of gatekeeping process in developing citizens of smart city.
Participation and Partnership
It is clear that globalization has substantial effects on city development. Most cities such as those in Europe experience the challenge of combining competitiveness as well as sustainable urban development simultaneously CITATION Gif07 \l 1033 (Giffinger, et al., 2007). It is evident that the issue is having an impact on factors of urban quality like culture, housing, social, as well as environmental conditions; thus, changing a city’s profile and urban quality in its composition of characteristics as well as factors. City rankings are tools to determine city assets. Research indicates that cities are ranked differently due to different interests behind rankings as well as the indicators and methodological techniques used. According to Odendaal, a smart city is one that capitalizes on the prospects presented by information and communication technology in supporting its prosperity and influence. She is trying to explore the ways in which the concept of the smart city can be used to improve city governance. Therefore, the use of information technology in local government can enhance not only the management, but also the functioning of cities CITATION Ode03 \l 1033 (Odendaal, 2003). The strategy for the invention includes creating partnerships with industry to drive sustained information technology improvements in the economy. In addition, it is vital to develop partnerships with education institutions and communities to facilitate adequate skills development and local access to good information as well as technology services.
Communication
Communication is defined as means of connecting between people by transferring information from one place to another. Castell is trying to explain the social and economic dynamics of the information age CITATION Cas \l 1033 (Castells, 2011). The social dynamics include human progress, improved policies, practices, as well as programs. On the other hand, economic dynamics include behavior businesses, markets, and the general economy. Odendaal suggests that ICT can be embraced as a tool of communication to improve smart cities. For instance, creating networks to enable the implementation of e-government approaches in all its guises is key to success CITATION Ode03 \l 1033 (Odendaal, 2003). It is clear that this factor create numerous networks in trying to develop active citizens of smart day.
Education
According to Dirks and Keeling (2009), Education is the process of receiving information, model patterns of behavior and translating them into real knowledge, allowing informed actions. It is evident that a smart city is the one that embraces its educational institutions to transform its core systems as well as optimize the return from largely finite resources (Dirks & Keeling, 2009). As per Giffinger et al, education is a factor that is used to evaluate cities and ranked according their education levels. Thus, education is embraced by the cities to sharpen their profile as well as improve their position in the competition of cities CITATION Gif07 \l 1033 (Giffinger, et al., 2007). According to Washburn et al (2010), Education is an important aspect that increases access, improves quality, as well as reduces costs in smart cities. The main role of this factor in smart city is to improve the quality and experience of people regarding digital content as well as collaboration technologies.
Quality of Life
Sawick (2003) defines quality life as the way of transforming work, leisure, and community to improve the quality of life. For example, free culture innovation and creativity methods are important in people’s everyday lives CITATION Saw03 \l 1033 (Sawicki, 2003). The prevalent approaches extend as well as recodify entrenched tendencies in neoliberal urban politics and culture policy. This elevates creativity to the status of a new urban imperative. The main role of this ranking is to compare features as well as to identify strengths and weaknesses of medium-sized cities. By doing this, it is easy to determine the quality of life people are living in...