Organic and non-Organic foods (Other (Not Listed) Sample)

Instructions:

Hello there,
Bellow shows the instruction how the paper should look. Also please the video should be from youtube or web-site that the Prof can watch it. I mean not from website that need to pay and subscribe. Please do not forget to make a citation because the paper will be submitted through SAFE ASSIGN. I will upload a file that show an example for the paper.
Type of paper is Executive Summary of an existing report
- 900 words (minimum) in length (single or 1.5 line spacing) focused on the most critical points to give a reader an overview and understanding on the main outcome(s). One letter grade reduction for each day late.
- 12 pt Times New Roman Font
- You’ll receive a menu of 40-60 minute video presentations. You will pick one video, review it, take notes and write a summary.
- List title in 14 pt, Bold; date and include your name at the header
- Paper will be submitted through SAFE ASSIGN.
A video about organic and non-organic food. Then write about by following the instructions that listed when I placed the order. He/she has to find a video about my topic

Under Cyber Attack:EY’s Global Information Security Survey 2013This report focuses on the state of cyber security in 2013 and how it can be improved. Itcompiles cyber security related information from over 1,900 companies that shows how theycurrently react to cyber security matters.Over the past year, cyber security has seen improvements in terms of growth, but it mustoccur faster in order to keep up with current threats. There are three specific areas of cybersecurity that this report focuses on: How can cyber security can be improved? How can these improvements be expanded upon? How can companies innovate and envision new aspects of cyber security?IMPROVEMENTIn order to improve security, companies must take a proactive approach to security andunderstand threats before they become a reality. Currently, many companies only feel the need toreact to threats when they have been realized. Unfortunately, once a security breach hasoccurred, damage has already been done to a system. There are already many improvements in2013 that have been made over previous years; companies have become more efficient inkeeping systems up during problematic times as well as more focused on the speed of recoverytimes in order to minimize downtime. The response to cyber threats has also improved with 38%of companies considering it as a top priority. Improvements have continued to increase ascompanies are now maintaining budgets or even allocating more money towards cyber security.While many companies have considered cyber security a side note to other business operations inthe past, most of them have now made it a part of their core strategy in order to stress itsimportance to their well-being.Cyber security is becoming more recognized, but there are still a few things that needimprovement. While cyber security is continuing to improve, some companies do not have theexecutive support required to make improvements throughout their entire organization. Budgetsfor many organizations are still tight as some companies don’t see the full value of cybersecurity. At least one third of the companies reviewed are considered exposed to outside threatsdue to slow or nonexistent improvements in their cyber security measures. The biggest cybersecurity issue for most companies is emerging threats. Staying ahead of future threats has alwaysbeen an issue for cyber security as many companies tend to focus on current threats. While it isnot something that can be easily remedied, emerging threats must always be at the forefront ofany company that is connected to the rest of the world in any way, shape or form.EXPANSIONExpansion of cyber security will become increasingly important as personal informationbecomes more prevalent on the internet. First and foremost, the only way to begin expansion ofcyber security is to gain the support of company board members. In addition, the organization as 02/16/2014 John Mahera whole must realize the value cyber security holds so executives will invest in it. Cyber securitystrategies and processes must be documented and standardized in order to maintain expansion inaddition to keeping executives notified. One often overlooked aspect of cyber security expansionis the physical security that contains the company’s system. The best cyber security can becompromised if an unauthorized person can tamper with the hardware directly. Physical securityis critical, but perpetual improvement of cyber security is key. If security is not being improvedconsistently, systems become vulnerable.INNOVATIONInnovation will be a key component of cyber security as it will ensure companies haveestablished measures that will keep them ahead of those who would wish to compromise theirsystems. In order to innovate, we must look at three different types of technologies: Current technology such as digital devices or social media Upcoming technology including cloud cervices and big data Conceptual technology like digital currency and in-memory computingAfter ranking these technologies in such a way, they must be further broken down byanswering the following questions: How well are these technologies known? Do we have the capabilities to secure the technology? How much research should we focus on the security of the emerging technologies?Once the technologies have been broken down in this way, it was determined that currenttechnologies require the most research as they are well known and companies are able to securecurrent technology greater than any upcoming or conceptual technologies.Even though companies focus on securing current technology, they should place additionalfocus on the near-future. If research is not adequately conducted on future technologies,companies typically find themselves unable to defend themselves from hackers who have beenresearching the technology since its conception. Investing research in upcoming technologieswill keep a company protected in addition to providing them with a competitive advantage overother companies.More attention should also be placed on conceptual technologies. Due to the alarming rate atwhich technology grows, today’s concept could be tomorrow’s standard.CONCLUSIONIn conclusion, companies do well with managing risks that are already known, but only 17%of them believe that their cyber security needs are adequately met. The alarming speed oftechnology development has made it difficult for companies to keep up with the security needsof emerging technologies. While increasing cyber security budgets and employee awareness aregood solutions to this problem, high-level executives must be actively involved in order toachieve optimal results. Cyber security is often thought of as an expense with little value, but 02/16/2014 John Maherwith more sensitive information travelling through the internet every day, an attack will not onlybe imminent but costly in more ways than money if they are successfully carried out.

source..

Content:

Organic and nonorganic food
Student:
Professor:
Course title:
Date:
Organic and non-organic food
Chrispeels, Maarten. (2014). Genetically Modified Food or Organic: Do We Have to Choose? University of California, San Diego.
In the video, Chrispeels (2014) contrasts both genetically manipulated crops and organically grown crops. Although there are today more than 800 million people globally who are food insecure, food is more plentiful in the present day than it has ever been in the past. However, people worry about their food and there are protests about genetically modified foods – non-organic foods – all over the world in both developing and developed countries (Chrispeels, 2014). There are 2 sorts of food nowadays: (i) the genetically modified food, or non-organic; and (ii) the organic food. Organic food has become a vital economic sector that actually promotes an image of providing healthier food compared to other sectors. Organic food should be thought of as an industry. Activists have managed to create the image that GM foods come from the lab and are therefore suspect, and should not be bought, but organizations that produce them fight back and battle for their market share. Both genetic manipulation and organic are agricultural systems (Chrispeels, 2014).
Which type of agricultural system is the best?
To understand this, people need to know the vision for agriculture in society. These include ensuring that: (i) everyone has adequate food for a healthy life; (ii) malnutrition is absent; (iii) food comes from effective low-cost systems; (iv) food production is sustainable; and (v) farmers and farm workers make an honest living (Chrispeels, 2014). Genetically improved varieties account for about 50% of all productivity gains in the past 100 years. All the other inputs account for the other half. The father of genetics, Gregor Mendel, made the first crosses and he found that characteristics of plants and organisms are transmitted from one generation to another. His contribution played a significant role to genetic technology. Hybrid rice, the result of controlled crossing of two different varieties is increasing productivity of rice in Asia and other parts of the globe (Chrispeels, 2014).
Non-organic, genetically engineered foods
In genetic manipulation, scientists rely on a natural gene transfer mechanism. This has come to be understood as GM technology and the crops known as GM crops. The most successful genetically manipulated crops are the insect resistant cotton. Cotton farmers all over the world love genetically modified cotton that is insect resistant primarily because it cuts the application of insecticide by 40 percent, saves money and increases yield. They have to spray less pesticide and this crop decreases their costs (Chrispeels, 2014). The other example of successful genetically modified crop is the herbicide resistant GM soybeans which have been quickly adopted by farmers all over the world given that they simplify weed management and save money. In addition, they facilitate no-till practices thereby reducing the environmental impact of agriculture. Since there is no-till, there is less erosion (Chrispeels, 2014).
GM crops are very much regulated. Government regulations have actually made it rather difficult to introduce GM crops. They are required to be approved by USDA, FDA, as well as EPA. In essence, every new GM crop is tested and/or approved on a crop-by-crop and gene by gene basis. Companies would only develop GM crops for which there is an adequate return on investment (ROI) and financial reward (Chrispeels, 2014).
Safety of non-organic, GM foods
According to Chrispeels (2014), every genetically modified food has been extensively tested and they are actually safe just as other foods in the marketplace. No case is known of a person who consumed non-organic foods and became even slightly sick. Non-organic foods can also be made into junk food like the organic foods. In essence, non-organic foods are as safe just as organic foods. Genetic modification with molecular techniques is a vital new tool for plant breeders. Better seeds – genetically improved – are the most significant input into agriculture. There is really no reason for not accepting foods from genetically modified crops and there is every reason for embracing them. However, this does not imply that GM technology by itself would feed the hungry or that agricultural practices cannot be improved (Chrispeels, 2014).
Organic foods
The organic industry, organic farmers, and the USDA agreed on rules that have to be followed to label food as organic. Certified organic farming makes use of (i) manures and allows only specific inorganic – chemical – fertilizers; (ii) pesticides that are traditional or found in nature; and (iii) all techniques of crop improvement except genetic manipulation (Chrispeels, 2014). Organic farming is driven by rules and not by outcomes, although outcomes are presumed in people’s minds. These presumed outcomes are as follows: (i) food is tastier and healthier; (ii) chemical farming destroys the soil; (iii) organic is better for the environment; (iv) organic farming is more natural; and (v) traditional agriculture destroys biodiversity. Nonetheless, there is no evidence that support the wide perception among consumers that organic farming methods result in foods of higher nutritional quality. The tastiness of food is dependent on the time from harvest to preparation or consumption, and the time between harvest and sell.
Both methods of farming are not natural. Neither GM agriculture and organic agriculture is natural since both contribute to the loss of biodiversity (Chrispeels, 2014). The claim that chemical fertilizer destroys the soil is refuted by the findings of a 150-year experiment in England. It was observed that chemical fertilizers do not damage the soil’s potential producti...

Get the Whole Paper!

Not exactly what you need?

Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Order

Organic and non-Organic foods (Other (Not Listed) Sample)

Other Topics: