The Place Of Tolerance In Islam By Khaled Abou El Fadl (Book Review Sample)
I was tasked to write a review on the book The place of tolerance in Islam by KHALED Abou El Fadl. attached is the sample work of the review.source..
The place of tolerance in Islam by KHALED Abou El Fadl
After September 11, the relationship between tolerance and violence among the Muslims has been discussed widely. Many non-Muslims around the world find it difficult to understand how the two aspects come together. Many critics have made an effort to paint Islam in one monolithic view which is not in relation with the dynamic and diverse humanistic experience. Islamic leaders around the world have many times come forth to defend their religion as a tolerant one, especially after periods when individuals in the name of Allah have undertaken mass killings, claiming that the perpetrators involved are not Muslims and do not represent Allah in any way. The perpetrators themselves have most often said their actions were legitimate and informed by writings from the Qur'an. Academics and intellectuals of Islam, both Muslim and non-Muslim, have contested the advancement of this stereotype by stressing that a) Islam is not one sided and that there are many exegesis of Islam regarding geography, time and other conditions; b) The core and main values of Islam embolden tolerance and not violence; and c) Even if self-defense is necessary at a time of violence, Islam lays out limits on the use of force. One of these scholars is Khaled Abou El Fadl, a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. He discusses the place of tolerance in Islam in his book by the same name.
This book is an endeavor to counter the impression of Islam especially held by the United States people after the terrorist attacks in 9/11. The book begins with an essay by El Fadl about the issue of tolerance as understood in Islamic theology and how it is interpreted among Muslims. He begins this engaging debate by contending that Islam is a profoundly tolerant religion. He very well refutes away the terrorist's intolerant and skewed interpretations of the Qur'anic writings by insisting that a better and more precise interpretation of the holy book would consider the historical contexts of verses. He further notes that the terrorists do not look into the Qur'an as a whole thus contradicting other passages which are more central and tolerant to the practice of Islam. He states that the problem of misquotation and misinterpretation of religious texts is not unique to Muslims only but also other religions as well. While El Fadl urges from a central view of tolerance, justice and kindness in Islam, he insists also that the Qur'an just like all other religious texts provide “possibilities for meaning not inevitabilities” thus the argument in opposition to Islamic fundamentalism can't simply be textual.
The second section of the book is made up of eleven reactions to El Fadl's essay by noteworthy individuals such as Professors John Esposito, Amina Wadud and others. The book then closes as El Fadl follows up and reflects on the opinions of his co-authors. The all-inclusive effect of reading all the three parts is rather one of ambivalence; the reader becomes deeply engrossed in discourse with each writer, growing in the realization with each engagement how complicated and multifaceted the issues faced by modern Muslims are.
It emerges therefore that while theologically Islam is tolerant of non-Muslims, there are individual Muslims who harbor views that are intolerant, unjustifiably picked from the Qur'an. El Fadl condemns these views as eisegesis. In two particular scintillating essays, Abid Ullah Jan and Tariq Ali compellingly contend that the west is the one which is sometimes intolerant and taken “advantage of Islamic tolerance to force Muslims into greater subservience.” A majority of the responses are well thought out and key in an advancement in Islamic theological perspective.
According to El Fadl, the outstanding reason for the increase of misleading versions of religions is the insistence to be looking for the “pure” interpretation of religions. However, by erasing the Qur'ans moral and historical context, the puritans end up with a watered down text bearing a long list of legalistic commands and morally non-committal standards. The puritans build their discriminatory and intolerant theology by studying the Qur'an in seclusion, as though the passages were clear and had direct meaning - as though historical context and moral ideas were not relevant to their interpretation. He further states that one of the puritans was Osama Bin Laden who claimed to be “purifying” Muslims from traditional divergences, misrepresented and misunderstood Islam. For instance, they misuse and misplace the word Jihad. According to the Islamic religion, war is either justifiable or its not but it is never holy. This
- The Help Book ReviewDescription: My favorite character in The Helpâ is Aibileen. She plays the center role in the book. Her interaction with other characters increases our understanding about them...2 pages/≈550 words| No Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Book Review |
- Slaves Narratives: Comparison of two booksDescription: Slaves Narratives: Comparison of two books Literature and Language Book Review...2 pages/≈550 words| 3 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Book Review |
- HamletDescription: In the play, Hamlet is seen to have a loving relationship with King Hamlet the deceased who was his biological father...4 pages/≈1100 words| APA | Literature & Language | Book Review |