Essay Available:
You are here: Home → Case Study → Business & Marketing
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
1 Source
Level:
APA
Subject:
Business & Marketing
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:
Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem (Case Study Sample)
Instructions:
Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem
The average failure rate of a new restaurant is 2.5 years, but Chez Panisse has been extremely successful since their opening in 1971. What characteristics led to the success of Chez Panisse?
Chez Panisse's unique open innovation strategy has been a predominant contributor to the restaurant's success since its opening. Open innovation frameworks enable firms to utilize external and internal firm resources to advance in ways that stimulate a broader market reach. Chez Panisse's framework engaged internal and external stakeholders in the restaurant. These included; produce suppliers, staff, alum chefs, and media personnel. The open innovation ecosystem was advantageous in several ways. For starters, the 'open' approach to innovation meant that each stakeholder in the business could participate or rather contribute to the strategy of the business. Chez Panisse and its owners openly communicated the restaurant’s vision to its stakeholders, including suppliers, farmers, and partners, to evolve collaboratively, an aspect that birthed numerous co-creation opportunities with its menu and resulted in the spread of innovation within the ecosystem. In addition, the collaborative culture at Chez Panisse created unique relations and increased overall employee satisfaction.
source..
Content:
Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem
Name
Institution
Course
Instructor
Due Date
Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem
1 The average failure rate of a new restaurant is 2.5 years, but Chez Panisse has been extremely successful since their opening in 1971. What characteristics led to the success of Chez Panisse?
Chez Panisse's unique open innovation strategy has been a predominant contributor to the restaurant's success since its opening. Open innovation frameworks enable firms to utilize external and internal firm resources to advance in ways that stimulate a broader market reach. Chez Panisse's framework engaged internal and external stakeholders in the restaurant. These included; produce suppliers, staff, alum chefs, and media personnel. The open innovation ecosystem was advantageous in several ways. For starters, the 'open' approach to innovation meant that each stakeholder in the business could participate or rather contribute to the strategy of the business. Chez Panisse and its owners openly communicated the restaurant’s vision to its stakeholders, including suppliers, farmers, and partners, to evolve collaboratively, an aspect that birthed numerous co-creation opportunities with its menu and resulted in the spread of innovation within the ecosystem. In addition, the collaborative culture at Chez Panisse created unique relations and increased overall employee satisfaction.
The open innovation strategy also bred knowledge spillover, which grew and expanded the ecosystem. The alum chef guest system allowed alum chefs to return to Chez Panisse, a process that channeled shared culinary knowledge. In addition, the strategy encompassed a sabbatical program that allowed head chefs a substantial leave period during which they would source inspiration and extend their experience beyond their workplace. The programs fostered creativity and innovation, which advanced the culinary experience at Chez Panisse.
The community learning culture and apprenticeship approach to training its new staff was another element of success for the restaurant. Collaborative learning fostered openness, innovation, and creativity, which translated to creative food design processes. In general, the strategic collaboration among the stakeholders, even in periods of change, created a solid and supportive community that co-evolved into a successful and sustainable ecosystem.
2 Who are the participants/stakeholders in the Chez Panisse ecosystem? What roles did each participant/stakeholder play?
The illustration in Figure 1 (Chesbrough et al., 2014, p.161) below shows the participants in the Chez Panisse System at its current stage of business growth.
Figure 1
Chez Panisse at the Global Expansion Phase (Current Stage of Business Growth)
Corporate PartnersAlumni Spin-offsCulinary SchoolsLocal SuppliersFood EducatorsChez Panisse RestaurantChez Panisse FoundationCulinary ArtistsWine SellersFood JournalistsCustomers
Corporate PartnersAlumni Spin-offsCulinary SchoolsLocal SuppliersFood EducatorsChez Panisse RestaurantChez Panisse FoundationCulinary ArtistsWine SellersFood JournalistsCustomers
Note. Adapted from Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem, by Chesbrough et al., 2014, p.161. Copyright 2014 by California Management Review.
The different stakeholders were integrated into the framework depending on its expansion stage. With each stage, the ecosystem expanded to include newer/more participants. At the initial birth stage of the ecosystem were the Family/Friends, Suppliers, and Farmers. Building relationships with farmers and suppliers marked the initial birth of the ecosystem. Suppliers brought fresh farm produce to the restaurant, which formed the base for ingredient-based menus. Family and friends worked as staff in the early years of the establishment when the business was struggling financially.
At the local expansion stage shown in Figure 2 (Chesbrough et al., 2014, p.158), other participants, such as food journalists, loyal customers, wine vendors, and culinary artists, joined the framework.
Figure 2
Chez Panisse Ecosystem at the Local Expansion Stage
Note. Adapted from Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem, by Chesbrough et al., 2014, p.158. Copyright 2014 by California Management Review.
Chez Panisse purposed to build meaningful relationships with other stakeholders beyond the food supply chain. Food journalists wrote about Chez Panisse and its culture and cuisine to the public, which drew massive attention from 'food lovers' and the more significant food industry. Loyal customers gave constructive feedback on food which the restaurant incorporated to better its service and product delivery. Culinary artists partnered with Waters and gave creative suggestions for better design and improved daily menus. Other artists, such as culinary ware designers, also supplied dinnerware to the restaurant. Wine vendors sold wine to Chez Panisse.
The global expansion stage is the current growth stage for Chez Panisse, illustrated in figure 1 above. Alumni spin-offs bred 'knowledge spillovers,' which expanded the open innovation ecosystem. The Chez Panisse Foundation was a nonprofit establishment aiming to educate young children on the importance and value of healthy food and ingredients. Food educators worked as teachers in educational programs under the Chez Panisse Foundation.
3 What are characteristics at Chez Panisse key to innovation? Are there any characteristics that interfere with innovation?
A majority of characteristics at Chez Panisse favor innovation and creativity. For instance, the collaborative approach to learning fosters the exploration of a wide array of ideas and suggestions, ultimately birthing innovation and innovative thinking. In addition, informal learning is a hub for creativity since imagination and learning are unbound. Unlike formal learning, informal education is mostly 'hands-on' and practical, helping employees build skills and authentic experience. Chez Panisse's culture is also open at its core, which helps create a sense of inclusion and cooperation. An open, flexible, and collaborative culture establishes trust within the team and boosts job satisfaction which could birth more innovation.
4 How did the Chez Panisse culture support innovation and creativity? Explain your answer. How could Chez Panisse expand creativity and innovation?
Chez Panisse's culture is notably open, inclusive, and collaborative. Individuals shine in their strengths and complement one another's shortcomings in terms of culinary skills. The approach to learning and training new staff was informal and practical, as with an apprenticeship program. When learning is unstructured, there is space to be creative and think innovatively. No restrictions, boundaries, or limitations usually present with formal learning, allowing for imagination.
The Sabbatical program for head chefs allowed them months of paid work leave. During this period, a majority of them would source inspiration from different places to which they would bring back newly acquired culinary knowledge and experience. This kept innovation, creativity, and learning at Chez Panisse alive. In addition, the alum chef guest program also allowed alum chefs to return with new culinary innovations that they shared with the staff at the restaurant.
Chez Panisse could consider hiring diverse talent within her team to expand creativity and innovation. Diversity pools talented individuals from different cultures, backgrounds, and groups, which could build more innovation in experimenting with different regional menus and catering to growing and changing customer needs.
5 What do you think Waters should focus on going forward and why?
Waters should focus on measures, plans, and actions that ensure the sustainability of the Chez Panisse ecosystem in the future. This is because a sustainable framework will remain functional even if she (Alice Waters) decides to leave. There are many ways through which sustainability at Chez Panisse can be increased—for starters, contracting or collaborating with sustainable suppliers and leveraging technology in the supply chain. Alternatively, Chez Panisse could consider supplying their own farm produce. Seasonal menu designs are sustainable. Howeve...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Other Topics:
- Case Study on Procurement Management Plan for "Apps Project"Description: Case Study on Procurement Management Plan for "Apps Project" Business & Marketing Case Study...4 pages/≈1100 words| 2 Sources | APA | Business & Marketing | Case Study |
- Case Study Report; The Challenges Facing Graham at Philla Plc and RecommendationsDescription: Case Study Report; The Challenges Facing Graham at Philla Plc and Recommendations Business & Marketing Case Study...9 pages/≈2475 words| 16 Sources | APA | Business & Marketing | Case Study |
- Managing Strategic Issues Within an Organisation: A Case Study of L’orealDescription: Managing Strategic Issues Within an Organisation: A Case Study of L’oreal Business & Marketing Case Study...16 pages/≈4400 words| 26 Sources | APA | Business & Marketing | Case Study |