Essay Available:
You are here: Home → Case Study → IT & Computer Science
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
8 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
IT & Computer Science
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 27
Topic:
Systems Analysis Design User Interface (Case Study Sample)
Instructions:
Notes: a) This is a hypothetical case. Students might have to do some research for this case.
b) You will use this case for ASSESSMENTS 1, 2, and 3 of MIS 300.
c) For all assessments, it is suggested that before you answer every question you should discuss your assumptions very categorically if any.
d) Read this document multiple times to understand it completely. It is not written in a straightforward manner. Some parts of the case are elaborate while others are not explained in much detail. This has been done purposely. You may not find answers for everything therefore ‘requirement development’ would help you. See the web for what requirement development is and how it is done. CMMI standard offers a detailed understanding of ‘requirement DEVELOPMENT.
e) Look out for redundant information in this case.
source..
Content:
Systems Analysis Design User Interface
Student's Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Name
Instructor's Name
Date
Introduction
To reduce project expenses, this article will provide a case study solution for an automated system that would assign teams to projects, tasks to teams, choose the best team members for the groups, and distribute teams to projects. Order management, customer relationship management, online assistance for consumer demand, and a forecasting function are all necessary for the system. Bayesian networks can be used to control supply chain uncertainty, according to studies by Chen et al. (2010). To lower risks, some researchers have also investigated the use of Bayesian networks in supply chain forecasting techniques. If you've ever visited a website and had trouble navigating it or comprehending the content it was providing, it's likely that you closed the window and tried another one. The poor user interface design of the website is most likely to blame for this. The idea that the customer is always right is acknowledged, and it makes sure that this assertion is mirrored in every facet of your website.
User Design Interface
The element that acts as a go-between between the user and the layout, enabling efficient customer engagement with the system, is known as the user interface (UI) of the system. The user interface (UI) of the program is crucial. When it comes to visibility, its precision and ingenuity are crucial for showing the exact amount of information to the intended recipient. Every little decision made while designing the user interface has the potential to either enhance or deteriorate the product. Based on case studies and research findings, this report emphasizes the methods presently used for creating appealing user interfaces and provides insightful suggestions for enhancing UI designs. An effective UI design results in a positive user experience, which is a competitive advantage. An organization may stand out if it makes an effort to meet client demands.
Usability in User Design Interface and its importance
Usability is a term that describes how well a user interface and user interaction work in an application. Usability is crucial for a multitude of reasons, including reducing training time and costs, reducing user error, improving business and achievement of students, and optimizing interface interaction quality. Designers should follow usability guidelines and employ the right usability concepts to increase the usability of their systems (Dix et al., 2004). In trials on HCI consistency, measurement systems and self-reported metrics are commonly implemented. Metrics that users themselves report, such as how they rank a new piece of software or how challenging they perceive a task to be, are known as self-reported metrics. The quantity of time spent on a job (time-on-task), the number of mistakes committed, or the number of clicks made are all examples of performance metrics.
Difference between UX and UI. The "UI" in UI design stands for "user interface". The user interface of a software program refers to its graphical user interface. It incorporates all the components that users may interact with, including the sliders, text entry fields, buttons, and other factors like text and graphics. All micro-interactions are covered, along with screen layout, transitioning, and interface animations. Design must be put into every aesthetic element, interactive functionality, and spirit. User experience, or UX, is a shorthand. The experience a user has with the app depends on how they interact with it. The encounter either appears smooth and natural or uncomfortable and confusing. Does using the app feel logical or random? Users should review whether using the app makes them feel like they are succeeding in the goals they set out to pursue. The user experience will depend on how easy or difficult it is to communicate with the interface components that the UI designers have created. The way that modern maps are created and utilized has completely transformed since they are frequently quite interactive and delivered online or via mobile devices.
The progress of personal information technology and computers is to blame for this. The terms "user interface" and "user experience" are related to a blend of ideas, proposals, and procedures. Any interactive product, including maps, may fall under that same. The geospatial industry and the more important technology sector are experiencing growth in the UI/UX field. During real-world software engineering and web design projects, UI/UX designers must communicate with stakeholders and target customers. UI and UX cannot be used interchangeably because of their differing emphasis on interfaces as opposed to interactions. In digital mapping, an interface is a software program that allows the user to customize layouts and the geographic data that underpins them. The interaction between a human user and a digital asset via a computing device is a two-way question-answer or request-result interaction that goes beyond the interface (Roth, 2012). Therefore, engagement is reliant on the response depending on the request, creating loops of interaction—and empowering—by giving the user agency in the simulation procedure with modifications based on their interests and requirements (Sundar et al. 2014).
Consistency and Discoverability. Grudin (2022) asked for an innovative method for assessing consistency in a user interface. He argued against the assumption that a user experience should be consistent, claiming that doing so would deceive designers into thinking that an interface had a good design. The current iteration of consistency seems to have its origins in the perspective of a developer. The finest demonstration of this is one of the defenses of when inconsistencies are better. study on conceptual consistency. Although what a developer (or designer) could deem consistent may as well be inconsistent from the viewpoint of the user, he appears to overlook this in his example. When it comes to product and interface design, discoverability refers to how quickly a user can locate all of a new system's components and functions when they first use it. When making user interfaces and user experiences for websites, software, and devices, such competence is essential. Recently, prominent web developers said that at least for web-based usability, consistency is unimportant (37signals, 2006; Hurst, 2004). They assert that the user's needs, not the interface's homogeneity, should come first. This type of logical discrepancy in thinking was initially conceived by Hurst.
The terms discoverability and findability are typically used synonymously in user experience design. Despite their connection, they are not the same. The primary contrast is in how individuals approach the subject matter. Findability is the ability to locate information or a feature that clients are already aware of or expect to find in a product. The ability to find information in new ways or a trait that others were not aware of is the opposite of discoverability.
This contrast makes it simpler to comprehend why it is difficult to design highly discoverable interfaces. Individuals frequently look for new goods without ever even realizing it. People use items, and if they don't encounter novel features or content, they won't even try looking for it since they aren't aware it is a part of the product. Focusing on discoverability can help UX designers solve this problem by making it easier for users to find those exotic entities
Sequence Diagram
Figure 1
Sequence diagram of supply chain
4943475313690723900313690433387538735BK. Suppliers0BK. Suppliers38100038735SupplierSupplier
489585017589500657225175895800100299720 Request Login Details
800099208915 ...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Other Topics:
- Cloud Services for Business Continuity and Disaster RecoveryDescription: There has been a concern expressed by top management that our organization is vulnerable to a natural disaster that could impact our IT infrastructure to a point where business could be significantly impacted. This concern is very real and a relevant part of IT planning and work. Natural or manmade ...4 pages/≈1100 words| 4 Sources | APA | IT & Computer Science | Case Study |
- Two Case Studies in Information Security and Social NetworksDescription: As the old saying goes, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”. Therefore, the first step to consider when regarding a new home computer is the security of my data. My files and pictures are worth (to me) more than the hardware. So, the first step I would have is to acquire secondary storage ...10 pages/≈2750 words| 15 Sources | APA | IT & Computer Science | Case Study |
- Case Study: Autopsy of a Data BreachDescription: Three key problems are evident throughout the case study. First, Target ignored multiple malware alerts. Second, prevention functionalities were turned off by administers, and this can be linked to the unfamiliarity of administrators with the ...3 pages/≈825 words| 2 Sources | APA | IT & Computer Science | Case Study |