Essay Available:
You are here: Home → Case Study → Communications & Media
Pages:
12 pages/≈3300 words
Sources:
Level:
Harvard
Subject:
Communications & Media
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.K.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 39.95
Topic:
Case Study of How UK Media (Case Study Sample)
Instructions:
The Case Study of How UK Media (Guardian and Independent) Portrayed Asylum Seekers in United Kingdom.
source..Content:
Case Study of How UK Media (Guardian and Independent) Portray Asylum Seekers
Name
Class
Professor
Institution
City
State
Date
Introduction
During the last decade, the asylum system has experienced a severe breakdown of trust from all sides in the after a rising and then falling in the number of people who seek asylum in the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom government has formed legislation that can enable them to minimize people who enter the United Kingdom to seek for asylum. However, this legislation have made very hard for those who claim asylum, apply and also have their cases to heard in a fair manner. Most of the asylums no longer have trust in the system's capability in delivering a fair hearing. This is because of inadequacy of the law that can support the system, inaccurate translation and making of decisions that are of poor quality. The asylum system failed to encourage those who refused asylum seekers, and, for this reason, this has forced the seekers into illegality and destitution. On the hand, the members of the public have also lost confidence in the asylum system, and they believe that it is too open to abusive, yet their comprehending on the problem is very little. In summary, immigration and asylum issues have a lot of controversies in the areas of debate and public policy a (Finney, 2003).
In addition, formation of the policy and public are not served up to best due to inaccuracy of coverage by the media coverage that is unfair and misleads as well. Those who seek asylum and refuge due to fleeing conflicts and from being persecuted are attacked, in the United Kingdom, as well as the communities identified with them. However, alarming media coverage is blamed because they validate and encourage such attacks. The media and politicians polarized views made informed and balanced debate almost impossible (Finney, 2004). In the month of October, 2003 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) gave a guiding note to journalist and editors. They warned them of the risks that inaccurate, misleading or distorted reporting can generate the atmosphere that is full of hostility and fear. They term such conducts as breaching of Clause one of the industries Code of Practice.
For this reason, this research would focus on how media houses, the guardian and independent, portrait asylum seekers on their publication dated 26th January, 2015. Further, the report would attempt to focus on past analysis by scholars on how the independent and guardian monitor and report refugees and asylum seekers. Even from the time Complaints Commission Guidance Note on Reporting Refugees and Asylum Seekers was introduced in the month of October, 2003.
Review of Relevant Literature
Overview of Asylum Seekers
United Kingdom had been experiencing a rise in asylum applications, and they dealt with the problems in a way that was good. However, despite all these population there was negative portray by the UK media and this sparked complaints by the public sector. However, it doesn’t mean UK government is soft regarding the issue of deporting people as a matter of fact they recorded high number of Asylum refusal. The main idea behind this is adopting integrated approaches that recognize those who seek asylum cannot be controlled in a bureaucratic manner. For this reason, this increases their flexibility system hence informed and empowered refugees (Negrine, 1994).
Asylum in the United Kingdom
The United Kingdom has had a culture of providing asylum. Currently, the issue of asylum in the United Kingdom is controlled by international legislation. The United Kingdom is a signatory member of the United Nation Convention that relates to the 1967 protocol, Status of Refugees 1951, t, and the Europe Conventions on Human Rights 1950. More recently, the UK has signed EU directives that are intended to facilitate a Common European Asylum System. In addition, those who sought for asylum in the United Kingdom and globally rose tremendously during the year 1990s and early part of 2000
Annual asylum applicants in the United Kingdom was approximated to be 46,005 in 1998, 80,320 in 2000, and peaked at 84,135 in the year 2002. However, from the year 2002 the numbers have dropped significantly, in 2004 there were only 33,940 applicants and the trend is assumed to go down further. This is because the worldwide trends were reported to drop in the number of asylum seekers. Globally, for the four consecutive years, to 9.4 million in the year 2004, a fall of about 24% in the last four years was realized. This was connected to a decrease in the number of major armed conflicts globally. The decrease in numbers asylum seekers in the United Kingdom is also due to United Kingdom European policies and government (UNHCR, 2005).
Since the beginning of 1990s, governments that followed responded to the rise of refugees by introduction of legislation that targeted to control the flowing and reduce the asylum seekers intake. They also sought to fulfill their duties of offering protection to refugees under the 1951 United Nation Convention. In addition, the European Common Asylum Policy imposed control measures that intended to restrict the movement of asylum seekers between European nations (UNHCR, 2006).
Asylum Trend in United Kingdom
Significant measures have been made to minimize pulling factors that attract people to come to the United Kingdom to seek asylum. However, there is no simpler relationship between the support condition in the United Kingdom and the decision to seek asylum. The increasing tight controls of UK borders have not been an effective tool to minimize numbers of asylum seekers and this in-discriminative made genuine asylum seeker hard as well. It has been pointed that the reasons as to why people select United Kingdom to seek asylum points to family ties and colonial links. Also, a belief in UK having a Judicial system that is fair as the key factor for choosing Britain to claim asylum. It is not even anything to do with neither employment opportunities nor knowledge of the welfare system. Despite this, misguided attempts to minimize pulling factors for refugees' applicants have resulted in policy that withholds accessibility to important services, such as healthcare, from refused asylum seekers (Nyers, 1999).
Causes of Number of Asylum Fluctuation
Although the causes of fluctuation in numbers of Asylum application to the United Kingdom over the previous ten years are very complex, it is clear that they are mainly worldwide. There is a relationship between the highest number of asylum seekers and nations that faces war or they are oppressed politically. For instance, the top 4 people who were seeking asylum in the year 2002 were mainly from Iraq, Zimbabweans, and Somalia and Afghanistan. In addition, the scenario was not peculiar to the United Kingdom (Eriksson & Wallenstein, 2004). This surely dispels the myth that United Kingdom domestic incentives are the key attracting factors for people coming to the United Kingdom. Also, that creates a harsh experience has had much effect the other way (Statham, 2003).
Challenges facing Asylum System in United Kingdom
The biggest challenges with the incumbent United Kingdom asylum system relate to the way that finance and accommodation support is withheld instantly after negative decisions have been reached the claim of asylum. However, despite being some statutory support given, majority of refugees in such scenario decides to go underground and practice activities that are very illegal. For instance, being a prostitute and destitution instead of accepting the support given with the conditions of returned voluntary being attached. The exact number of destitute refused asylum seekers is unknown. However, the British Red Cross is estimating that at least 25,000 destitute asylum seekers are staying on Red Cross food parcels in the United Kingdom (Kleiner, 1998).
In addition, the faith-based and voluntary organizations have come in to fill the gap by providing a life-line to the majority of these asylum seekers who are vulnerable. Their professionalism, dedication and compassion to the plight of this individual have saved many asylum seekers from starving, illness and committing suicide. However, they are not able to receive funds from any statutory to offer support to refused asylum seekers; for this reason, they are left stretching to almost a point of breaking. Asylum seekers are not entitled to any paid employment. This is not only destroying an individual’s mentality, but also de-skilling professionals who are motivated and qualified employees who could contribute to the UK economy and pay their way (Lewis, 2005).
Research Methodology
The study would use a case study. It is a terminology for a group of carrying out research that have in common the decision to focus on inquiry around a specific instance or event. One of the important merits of this method is that it assists the researcher with good understanding of how asylum seekers are portrait by the two media houses. In addition, it would apply a qualitative approach. Information obtained is not numerical and can include responses to an open-ended survey question, focus group discussion, a term paper, the answer to essay questions, or brainstorming ideas by individuals. This method of research data analysis is not restricted to words, however, and could involve the content of a design portfolio or art.
One merit of the qualitative approach is that information that is contextual is gathered when the data is collected. In other words, why is automatically provided in the data that is available. Another advantage is that those who respond are free to answer any manner they would wish. However, they are not restricted by set of possible answers as they might be in the questionnaire. Respondent gives answers freely, and information would be automa...
Name
Class
Professor
Institution
City
State
Date
Introduction
During the last decade, the asylum system has experienced a severe breakdown of trust from all sides in the after a rising and then falling in the number of people who seek asylum in the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom government has formed legislation that can enable them to minimize people who enter the United Kingdom to seek for asylum. However, this legislation have made very hard for those who claim asylum, apply and also have their cases to heard in a fair manner. Most of the asylums no longer have trust in the system's capability in delivering a fair hearing. This is because of inadequacy of the law that can support the system, inaccurate translation and making of decisions that are of poor quality. The asylum system failed to encourage those who refused asylum seekers, and, for this reason, this has forced the seekers into illegality and destitution. On the hand, the members of the public have also lost confidence in the asylum system, and they believe that it is too open to abusive, yet their comprehending on the problem is very little. In summary, immigration and asylum issues have a lot of controversies in the areas of debate and public policy a (Finney, 2003).
In addition, formation of the policy and public are not served up to best due to inaccuracy of coverage by the media coverage that is unfair and misleads as well. Those who seek asylum and refuge due to fleeing conflicts and from being persecuted are attacked, in the United Kingdom, as well as the communities identified with them. However, alarming media coverage is blamed because they validate and encourage such attacks. The media and politicians polarized views made informed and balanced debate almost impossible (Finney, 2004). In the month of October, 2003 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) gave a guiding note to journalist and editors. They warned them of the risks that inaccurate, misleading or distorted reporting can generate the atmosphere that is full of hostility and fear. They term such conducts as breaching of Clause one of the industries Code of Practice.
For this reason, this research would focus on how media houses, the guardian and independent, portrait asylum seekers on their publication dated 26th January, 2015. Further, the report would attempt to focus on past analysis by scholars on how the independent and guardian monitor and report refugees and asylum seekers. Even from the time Complaints Commission Guidance Note on Reporting Refugees and Asylum Seekers was introduced in the month of October, 2003.
Review of Relevant Literature
Overview of Asylum Seekers
United Kingdom had been experiencing a rise in asylum applications, and they dealt with the problems in a way that was good. However, despite all these population there was negative portray by the UK media and this sparked complaints by the public sector. However, it doesn’t mean UK government is soft regarding the issue of deporting people as a matter of fact they recorded high number of Asylum refusal. The main idea behind this is adopting integrated approaches that recognize those who seek asylum cannot be controlled in a bureaucratic manner. For this reason, this increases their flexibility system hence informed and empowered refugees (Negrine, 1994).
Asylum in the United Kingdom
The United Kingdom has had a culture of providing asylum. Currently, the issue of asylum in the United Kingdom is controlled by international legislation. The United Kingdom is a signatory member of the United Nation Convention that relates to the 1967 protocol, Status of Refugees 1951, t, and the Europe Conventions on Human Rights 1950. More recently, the UK has signed EU directives that are intended to facilitate a Common European Asylum System. In addition, those who sought for asylum in the United Kingdom and globally rose tremendously during the year 1990s and early part of 2000
Annual asylum applicants in the United Kingdom was approximated to be 46,005 in 1998, 80,320 in 2000, and peaked at 84,135 in the year 2002. However, from the year 2002 the numbers have dropped significantly, in 2004 there were only 33,940 applicants and the trend is assumed to go down further. This is because the worldwide trends were reported to drop in the number of asylum seekers. Globally, for the four consecutive years, to 9.4 million in the year 2004, a fall of about 24% in the last four years was realized. This was connected to a decrease in the number of major armed conflicts globally. The decrease in numbers asylum seekers in the United Kingdom is also due to United Kingdom European policies and government (UNHCR, 2005).
Since the beginning of 1990s, governments that followed responded to the rise of refugees by introduction of legislation that targeted to control the flowing and reduce the asylum seekers intake. They also sought to fulfill their duties of offering protection to refugees under the 1951 United Nation Convention. In addition, the European Common Asylum Policy imposed control measures that intended to restrict the movement of asylum seekers between European nations (UNHCR, 2006).
Asylum Trend in United Kingdom
Significant measures have been made to minimize pulling factors that attract people to come to the United Kingdom to seek asylum. However, there is no simpler relationship between the support condition in the United Kingdom and the decision to seek asylum. The increasing tight controls of UK borders have not been an effective tool to minimize numbers of asylum seekers and this in-discriminative made genuine asylum seeker hard as well. It has been pointed that the reasons as to why people select United Kingdom to seek asylum points to family ties and colonial links. Also, a belief in UK having a Judicial system that is fair as the key factor for choosing Britain to claim asylum. It is not even anything to do with neither employment opportunities nor knowledge of the welfare system. Despite this, misguided attempts to minimize pulling factors for refugees' applicants have resulted in policy that withholds accessibility to important services, such as healthcare, from refused asylum seekers (Nyers, 1999).
Causes of Number of Asylum Fluctuation
Although the causes of fluctuation in numbers of Asylum application to the United Kingdom over the previous ten years are very complex, it is clear that they are mainly worldwide. There is a relationship between the highest number of asylum seekers and nations that faces war or they are oppressed politically. For instance, the top 4 people who were seeking asylum in the year 2002 were mainly from Iraq, Zimbabweans, and Somalia and Afghanistan. In addition, the scenario was not peculiar to the United Kingdom (Eriksson & Wallenstein, 2004). This surely dispels the myth that United Kingdom domestic incentives are the key attracting factors for people coming to the United Kingdom. Also, that creates a harsh experience has had much effect the other way (Statham, 2003).
Challenges facing Asylum System in United Kingdom
The biggest challenges with the incumbent United Kingdom asylum system relate to the way that finance and accommodation support is withheld instantly after negative decisions have been reached the claim of asylum. However, despite being some statutory support given, majority of refugees in such scenario decides to go underground and practice activities that are very illegal. For instance, being a prostitute and destitution instead of accepting the support given with the conditions of returned voluntary being attached. The exact number of destitute refused asylum seekers is unknown. However, the British Red Cross is estimating that at least 25,000 destitute asylum seekers are staying on Red Cross food parcels in the United Kingdom (Kleiner, 1998).
In addition, the faith-based and voluntary organizations have come in to fill the gap by providing a life-line to the majority of these asylum seekers who are vulnerable. Their professionalism, dedication and compassion to the plight of this individual have saved many asylum seekers from starving, illness and committing suicide. However, they are not able to receive funds from any statutory to offer support to refused asylum seekers; for this reason, they are left stretching to almost a point of breaking. Asylum seekers are not entitled to any paid employment. This is not only destroying an individual’s mentality, but also de-skilling professionals who are motivated and qualified employees who could contribute to the UK economy and pay their way (Lewis, 2005).
Research Methodology
The study would use a case study. It is a terminology for a group of carrying out research that have in common the decision to focus on inquiry around a specific instance or event. One of the important merits of this method is that it assists the researcher with good understanding of how asylum seekers are portrait by the two media houses. In addition, it would apply a qualitative approach. Information obtained is not numerical and can include responses to an open-ended survey question, focus group discussion, a term paper, the answer to essay questions, or brainstorming ideas by individuals. This method of research data analysis is not restricted to words, however, and could involve the content of a design portfolio or art.
One merit of the qualitative approach is that information that is contextual is gathered when the data is collected. In other words, why is automatically provided in the data that is available. Another advantage is that those who respond are free to answer any manner they would wish. However, they are not restricted by set of possible answers as they might be in the questionnaire. Respondent gives answers freely, and information would be automa...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
