Strategies for Avoiding Fallacies (Essay Sample)

Strategies for Avoiding Fallacies Name Institutional Affiliation Strategies for Avoiding Fallacies Fallacy highlights error of thinking. in that certain actions leads to occurrences of others which in most cases is not factual (The Nizkor Project, 2012). In the Bandwagon fallacy (the H town USA, 2011), the characters in a bid to mobilize fellow congress men he Uses a illogical statement in that he states that if all the members shouted it won’t be a breach of decorum. The argument of tyranny verses the house law tends to be bear little troth but given his statement it tend to attract attention from fellow legislators. In reality, the whole house may be in breach of decorum if they act against the standing orders. During a presidential speech, the house is expected to remain silent and only raise issues after the speech. The arguments fail to address the standing orders and the consequences of breaching decorum (The Nizkor Project, 2012). The essence of character is to marshal out representatives towards a common goal, which is to disrupt the president address to the house. In reality, there is the essence of facts in that the character needs to quote standing orders while mobilizing support. Prior to his argument, he states that the health act will benefit all citizens except immigrants. To enable his argument to stand as a fact, he should quote laws concerning equality and address the issues to do with the 14th amendment thus highlighting the law as discriminatory. To add on the argument the character should address the diverse nature of the citizens and await the debate time in order to challenge the particular clause in to ensure that his point is put across the character should begin his statement with “during the debate time”. After which he would challenge the presidential health act based on law, standing orders and international requirements. The rest should second and support the argument in a bid to gunner support and call for amendments. The Post hoc argues that because of tyranny the rule of law may not apply (The Nizkor Project, 2012). The error of arguments highlights the essence of politics and the nature in which politicians gunner support. As a plan there is need to identify the consequences of certain actions before making conclusions. Addressing the legal requirements and the bill of right would be effective while addressing matters before the house. The representative should highlight the need to gunner support by presenting arguments that challenge the presidential speech rather than assuming that tyranny may present the house committee from taking action against the defiant members. The character should be aware o...