Essay Available:
You are here: Home → Essay → Literature & Language
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.2
Topic:
Gay Marriages (Essay Sample)
Instructions:
this was an argument essay whereby the writer, had to choose the side that they support. either the opposing or supporting side of the matter which is gay marriages and present strong points in line with their arguments
source..Content:
Students Name:
Instructors Name:
Date:
Gay Marriage
Introduction: Being gay, is an act in which it involves two human species of the same kind involving themselves in sexual and intimate acts. Gays more often tend to choose their sexual orientation; it is not genetic or hereditary as they claim it to be. My argument will mainly rely on the opposing side with a biblical aspect of life towards gay marriages. Conrad and Mattilda best explain this analogy. In their book Against Equality: Don't Ask to Fight Their Wars. Lewiston
Globally gay marriages have been the bone of contention over its legality; morally and politically for ages of which it should not have been given any attention whatsoever. When God created man, he created him with the intention of creating a partner for this man; that is a woman. God further gave the instructions that He has created this woman to be a sole companion to this man is able for them to multiply and fill the earth if need be this man if he ever felt the urge to seek for another companion, he should add another wife. HE didn't give instructions THAT gays should dominate over this earth and fill it with their filth.
But gay marriages are not in any way supporting and they cannot carry out that mandate from God, instead they are diminishing a culture; which is deemed pure and most natural ever that was initiated for us humans by our Creator God, as we see in (Gen. 1:28). It devalues the fundamental family entity of a husband and a wife that is the God-ordained beauty of reproduction. Scientific evidence aside from this biblical view further supports the notion that a nuclear family; one which consists of father, mother and child is the healthiest and happiest for that growing child who has needs to grow emotionally and psychologically. Anything that speaks the opposite of this denies a child its right to having a father and mother. As the Holy Bible states in Leviticus 18:22: this behavior is not pleasing to God's eyes, and it has consequences. From a Christian perception, it is a sin to view gay marriage even as a reasonable and acceptable act in our modern society.
Gay couples usually claim that they ''are born'' the way they are and that it is a genetic orientation because they didn't choose the situation they in which they are. They cannot be wrong if that is the case, but this is my question: why then do indistinguishable twins with the same genetics fail to have uniformity of sexual orientation? Or will they start suggesting that God doesn't EXIST just to avert this fact. This analogy proves it is not genetic in any way. Is their STAND only worthy of protection? This should not be in any form an avenue for the act because most gay individuals usually hide under the umbrella that they are being persecuted and ridiculed by the Christian community and society at large for CLAIMING their status. Judgment is upon those who practice it allowing their hearts to be hardened by this kind of perverse deed.
On a political view, the State says that there is nothing wrong with two people "expressing affection for each other." They ask why Christians judge them. Are you better than them? Some scoff. But, we in return ask who gives them the right to validate what is morally wrong or right in this society of ours? We have seen sadly that they are planting themselves in Top government positions as officials in many countries thus promoting these bizarre behaviors as to even having laws that fight for their rights. As a result, if we view how their lives are one would be very saddened. By this I mean most of them face high risks of contracting HIV / AIDS and other dangerous and deadly diseases plus, their children more often tend to adopt their sexual preferences eventually when they grow up as a result of what they see their parents do.
Media on the hand has done lots to encourage this trend by pointing out statements like "the world" and "common sense" and "fundamental rights," to support their opinion of homosexuality. Media, in this aspect, is showing that most gays are flocking into this industry to make their agendas more vocal. Many societies that support gay rights have a wrong foundation. What is common sense to an individual isn't a quite common sense to another? We all have basic rights no one refutes this. But, the gay community is taking this too far by wanting individual rights, which is selfish. It is quite evident that they want laws passed to protect their sexual activities and redefine marriages and have everyone else to accept their kind of marriage. It is, after all, grotesque and should not be accepted in this day and age.
We demand to inquire what rights they have to condemn Christians and be so very prejudiced when we say their behavior is sinful. They don't have sound arguments. But they do have emotional ones fueled by liberal stubbornness. These people are lucratively planting their morals in schools, TV, and movies as universal and f...
Instructors Name:
Date:
Gay Marriage
Introduction: Being gay, is an act in which it involves two human species of the same kind involving themselves in sexual and intimate acts. Gays more often tend to choose their sexual orientation; it is not genetic or hereditary as they claim it to be. My argument will mainly rely on the opposing side with a biblical aspect of life towards gay marriages. Conrad and Mattilda best explain this analogy. In their book Against Equality: Don't Ask to Fight Their Wars. Lewiston
Globally gay marriages have been the bone of contention over its legality; morally and politically for ages of which it should not have been given any attention whatsoever. When God created man, he created him with the intention of creating a partner for this man; that is a woman. God further gave the instructions that He has created this woman to be a sole companion to this man is able for them to multiply and fill the earth if need be this man if he ever felt the urge to seek for another companion, he should add another wife. HE didn't give instructions THAT gays should dominate over this earth and fill it with their filth.
But gay marriages are not in any way supporting and they cannot carry out that mandate from God, instead they are diminishing a culture; which is deemed pure and most natural ever that was initiated for us humans by our Creator God, as we see in (Gen. 1:28). It devalues the fundamental family entity of a husband and a wife that is the God-ordained beauty of reproduction. Scientific evidence aside from this biblical view further supports the notion that a nuclear family; one which consists of father, mother and child is the healthiest and happiest for that growing child who has needs to grow emotionally and psychologically. Anything that speaks the opposite of this denies a child its right to having a father and mother. As the Holy Bible states in Leviticus 18:22: this behavior is not pleasing to God's eyes, and it has consequences. From a Christian perception, it is a sin to view gay marriage even as a reasonable and acceptable act in our modern society.
Gay couples usually claim that they ''are born'' the way they are and that it is a genetic orientation because they didn't choose the situation they in which they are. They cannot be wrong if that is the case, but this is my question: why then do indistinguishable twins with the same genetics fail to have uniformity of sexual orientation? Or will they start suggesting that God doesn't EXIST just to avert this fact. This analogy proves it is not genetic in any way. Is their STAND only worthy of protection? This should not be in any form an avenue for the act because most gay individuals usually hide under the umbrella that they are being persecuted and ridiculed by the Christian community and society at large for CLAIMING their status. Judgment is upon those who practice it allowing their hearts to be hardened by this kind of perverse deed.
On a political view, the State says that there is nothing wrong with two people "expressing affection for each other." They ask why Christians judge them. Are you better than them? Some scoff. But, we in return ask who gives them the right to validate what is morally wrong or right in this society of ours? We have seen sadly that they are planting themselves in Top government positions as officials in many countries thus promoting these bizarre behaviors as to even having laws that fight for their rights. As a result, if we view how their lives are one would be very saddened. By this I mean most of them face high risks of contracting HIV / AIDS and other dangerous and deadly diseases plus, their children more often tend to adopt their sexual preferences eventually when they grow up as a result of what they see their parents do.
Media on the hand has done lots to encourage this trend by pointing out statements like "the world" and "common sense" and "fundamental rights," to support their opinion of homosexuality. Media, in this aspect, is showing that most gays are flocking into this industry to make their agendas more vocal. Many societies that support gay rights have a wrong foundation. What is common sense to an individual isn't a quite common sense to another? We all have basic rights no one refutes this. But, the gay community is taking this too far by wanting individual rights, which is selfish. It is quite evident that they want laws passed to protect their sexual activities and redefine marriages and have everyone else to accept their kind of marriage. It is, after all, grotesque and should not be accepted in this day and age.
We demand to inquire what rights they have to condemn Christians and be so very prejudiced when we say their behavior is sinful. They don't have sound arguments. But they do have emotional ones fueled by liberal stubbornness. These people are lucratively planting their morals in schools, TV, and movies as universal and f...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Other Topics:
- How to Use Solar Cell to Charge PhoneDescription: Wearable solar power energy is the primary topic of our research; this introductory essay will outline the basis uses of current solar power technology and its application for charging mobile devices....10 pages/≈2750 words| 8 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Management Executive SummaryDescription: This report offers comprehensive information on the four major managerial functions that business organizations utilize...7 pages/≈1925 words| 12 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Are Americans Becoming Too Dependent On ComputersDescription: The world that we live in today is one that is wholly dependent upon technology, which allows individuals from all four corners of the globe to be constantly interconnected with each other...2 pages/≈550 words| 5 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |