Identify the Underlying Factors that Led to the Bombing of Nagasaki (Essay Sample)

Dropping a Bomb over Nagasaki
Name
Institution
Dropping a Bomb over Nagasaki
Introduction
The atomic bomb attack on the high-compact civilian population of Japan was to make a political statement. A meeting held on February 1945 in Yalta resolved that the Soviet Union would connect the U.S in its conflict against Japan which was three months later after the Germans had been conquered in Europe. This issue was reaffirmed in the Potsdam conference among the U.S, Britain and the Soviet Union. The defeat of Germany on 8th May made way for the Russian army to march to Manchuria, later on, 9th August 1945. (Scientific Bomb Dropping, 1916).
Discussion
This conquest subsequently led them to the Japanese mainland. Russia was greeted as a supporter alongside Japan by Truman though he felt that too much ground had been awarded to Soviets following the Potsdam Conference. More than a few countries were annexed as Soviet Socialist Republics while another quantity of East European countries flattered as Soviet Satellite states.
Truman was, however, rigid that there would b no retaliation presentation of the agenda to overcome Japan. After the atomic bombs tests that had been done in mid-July, Truman remained confident that there would be no Soviet persuasion over postwar Japan as it had been agreed by the Potsdam conference.
Truman in his July 1945 Journal indicated that they were concerned with the alignment between Russia and Japan. The knowledge acquired at the Potsdam conference made him be strong-headed in that he wouldn’t permit the Russians to take part in the organization of Japan. In essence, the Russians only considered the use of force.
The only problem left for Truman was to make an impression on the Russians that Japan was not going to the method of a separated Germany as confirmed at the Potsdam conference. The answer to this predicament was as per Truman, was to bomb, to forgetfulness, the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Just as the U.S had planned, the bombing review indicated the obvious that Japan capitulated more U.S occupying forces than they did for Soviets.
As outlined in the Yalta conference in February, the Russian boots were owing in the Manchurian grounds on August 9thand, later on, would proceed to Japan. This event was to take place unless the Japanese surrendered first to the U.S forces that would, in turn, prevent Russia attacks on the Japanese mainland. This tactic would cause Russia defensible and in laying or maintaining divide in the plunder of a Soviet/U.S victory over Japan.
The bombings of Hiroshima on 6th August and Nagasaki on 9th of the same month, and a U.S receipt of the conditions in Japan on 10th August was to make sure that the state above of events did not take place. Unlike, the postwar Germany, only U.S would be allowed to order shots in Japan. The complete destruction of the two Japanese city states was an illustration of "force”. Truman felt that the Russians would with no doubt understand.
There however remain puzzling questions regarding these critical measures, wasn’t there an easier mean (that didn’t involve wiping out a quarter of a million population) that Truman would use to pass through his point? Why not only give the Japanese leadership with an expression of the huge unhelpful power of America’s new weapon. (Weinstein,1970). And if the demonstration was conducted previous to the Russian army’s go forward into Japan; wouldn’t this be adequate to dash any hopes the Russians had of distribution in the control of postwar Japan?
Why wasn’t there an expression of this kind before? Why did Truman decide to drop the bombs on two Japanese high-density population cities? There wasn’t time to systematize good display before Russia’s August 9 entry into conflict alongside Japan.
There was not enough time between 16 July when we acquainted within New Mexico that the bomb would be effective, and 8 August, the Russian time limit date, for us to have set up the very complicated technology of analysis on atomic bombings concerning prolonged troubles of region preparations. No, any examination would have been impracticable if the reason was to knock Japan out previous to Russia came in – or at least before Russia could make anything excluding a symbol of contribution previous to a Japanese fall.
Still, if we presume the most excellent endowment that there was no moment to organize an expression previous to Russia’s entry into the war next to Japan. This fact scarcely gives a good reason for dropping nuclear bombs on unprotected civilian populations. Up to now Finletter’s declaration is that the plummeting atomic bombs on the resident populations of the two Japanese cities were a completely satisfactory option to setting up an exhibition given that the U.S was having time-sensitive logistic trou...