Discussion on Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan in 1945 (Essay Sample)

Discussion on bombing of Japan in 1945
Name
Institution
Date
The atomic bomb is the most dangerous sophisticated weapons which can cause a massive destruction when launched in an area. For this reason, there is two cities’ which have remained historic after being attack by the atomic bomb. The cities were Hiroshima and Nagasaki located in Japan. However, I’ve argued on the issue whether it was right or wrong to invade these cities. In that regard, I have written some idea to support and reject the act.
America was involved in attacking Japan and I may say this was a bad act and it shouldn’t have taken place. This is because most of the innocent civilians were struck into death without their consent. Even secretary of combat Henry Lewis Stimson was not convinced that the bombs were required to decrease the attack. Japanese had no followers; its fleet was nearly smashed; its islands were beneath a naval barrier and its capital was undergoing intense air hit. The proposal for the employment of the bomb shows that the forces were more involved in its destruction effect than setting up the attack. Consequently, the devastation of hospitals and learning institution and other business firms was a right thing to them but according to human rights, it was against the law.
One other point is that the United State of America was more concerned in rapid and easy closing stages of the fighting than causing countless suffering. They had the weapons in their hands and it was the best time to end the Second World War and save the rest of the world.
It was definitely a practical observation for the American government to take such action since they had undergone losses of more than 418,000 individuals both forces and resident. To the top position of the American forces, the death of 135,000 individuals...