Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
You are here: HomeEssayHistory
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
1 Source
Level:
APA
Subject:
History
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 15
Topic:

History of Western Civilization: Alexander Kollontai, Winston Churchill, Otto Von Bismarck (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

Guidelines of the Essay
The Agony and the Ecstasy
Although history is the product of large quantities of mediocrity (ordinary people muddling through lives of significance primarily to themselves and those around them), a survey such as this tends to focus on Epic Triumphs and Epic Failures. Of course, not all of us have exactly the same opinion about what constitutes a triumph or a failure. Perhaps even an %uFFFDepic fail%uFFFD contains the seeds of a triumph if people learn from it. 
In an essay of at least 5 pages (double-spaced, 12-point font), discuss at least 5 examples of people, inventions, events, or developments that you consider to have been either triumphs OR failures. What do these triumphs (or failures) have in common? What led to them, and what effects did they have? Why do we (or should we) remember them (in other words, what makes them %uFFFDepic%uFFFD or world historic in magnitude)?
A few guidelines:
 Select your 5 examples from a variety of eras and societies
 Use at least 5 sources/readings from Worlds of History (the Reader), which will reinforce your opinions or reveal whether people at the time realized they were witnesses to/participants in something %uFFFDepic%uFFFD
 The strongest essays will be those that present a unifying thesis about the %uFFFDingredients%uFFFD or %uFFFDrecipe%uFFFD for epic failure/success . You should discuss triumphs OR failures.
 Choose your examples based on the assignments/resources available through this class.
The goal of this paper is for you to reflect more deeply on what we have read/covered, to develop your own ideas, and to persuade your reader to agree with you based on the evidence that you provide.
The goal of this paper is to reflect more deeply on what we have read/covered, to develop your own ideas, and to persuade your reader to agree with you based on the evidence that you provide.
Below are the five lessons I chose from the book and I have uploaded all the pages that you will need for this essay. 
Please only use information from these pages that I have uploaded no outside resource. Please make sure that you have at least 5 cited documents from the Perspectives from the Past (Pages that I have upload) in to essay. There should be no outside resources, only pages that I have uploaded. If you have question please let me know. Thank you.

source..
Content:

World History
Name of student:
Institution:
World History
The world has experienced economic, social and political problems in the past. There have been wars, notable among them being the Cold War, the First World War and the Second World War. There have been other wars as well, but these ones are the major ones, the wars that changed economic, social and political systems in the world. These wars saw revolutions. There was the Russian Revolution, the French Revolution and other smaller revolutions. This paper looks at events, people and important historical dates that redefined history, and shaded a new light in civilization, namely Western civilization.
The triumphs
Alexander Kollontai
She goes down in history as the only woman who fought for the rights and liberation of women in Russia. This was the time of Joseph Stalin, the Man who ruled Russia with an iron fist. He had placed so much power on men. Women were mere puppets during his regime. Kollontai championed for economic liberation of Russian women. She advocated for welfare benefits of these women. She particular demanded that mothers be allowed the privileges to vote and to make decisions about their love life. Prior to this, women had not been allowed to vote. They were thus excluded from important decisions such as voting or making contributions in parliament.
There were moments when she was at loggerheads with the Communist Party Leadership, the party in leadership then. She believed that a full transformation in Russia could only occur if everyone was involved, both men and women. So selfless was Alexander Kollontai that she left her husband and son to study politics in a bid to gain skills in matters political (Reilly, 2000). She was later to be appointed to the cabinet of Joseph Stalin. She openly disagreed with the administration for what she believed were excesses by the government.
The economic system in Russia around this time was socialist. She was later to given a post in Moscow in what political analysts believe was a strategic move to silence her, but she continued to lobby for women empowerment, not just in Russia but all over the world (Reilly, 2000). Her works would bear fruits later in history when more groups of women sprang up in protest of women suffrage. Later in history, women would be economically liberated, having been inspired by Alexander Kollontai.
Winston Churchill
A popular prime minister of Britain during the Cold War, Churchill championed for the unity, even in war, of America and Western Europe against the USSR. The USSR supported communism while the western Forces supported capitalism. These were the tensions that culminated into the Cold War. The Cold War was not good for economic growth as nations looked at each other with increasing suspicion. If the Soviet Union and its allies were not stopped, there was likely to be an outbreak of war. Churchill championed for dialogue among these nations. Although he failed, was very instrumental, through the numerous letters he wrote and his powerful and oratory speeches; he challenged the Soviet Union to stop communist and extremist activities.
The Soviet Union posed a threat to future security. Churchill did not start the Cold war; neither did he end it. But he had seen it forthcoming. He would define the central problems to the causes of the war. Churchill would try to talk to leaders such as Joseph Stalin on several occasions, about the consequences of Cold War. He foresaw the collapse of the Soviet bloc and the great economic depression (Reilly, 2000). In his own little way, he contributed to the end of the cold war, even if he did not witness its end. Political analysts and historians have always believed that he was instrumental in challenging America and Western Europe to unite against the USSR and bring to an end the communist regime, and to pave way for a more liberal world economy. In my view, he triumphed and contributed to the end of Cold War.
The French Revolution
The French revolution was fought by Aristocrats, professionals, civil servants, merchants, peasants and urban workers. They united against the government of the day. Then, French was ruled by monarchies, notable among them being the Napoleon Regime. During this time, France was riddled in poverty. Much of the wealth of the country was controlled by the dictatorial leadership and cliques of people close to the monarchy- often their relatives and people close to them. The people wallowed in abject poverty.
The revolution sought to oust the regime. The government had tried to sabotage the revolution (Reilly, 2000). The revolution demanded that the government look at the welfare of the soldiers, people who had fought during the World Wars. It lobbied for pension programs for the aged, hospitals for the needy, and future of the workers. The revolution was a success. After several years of their lobbying, the monarchy system in France was finally thrown out and an elected leadership came to power. Once again, France was on the road to recovery. The monarchy was dismantled. The French people fought for equality in life. The war took ten years, but it did see the end of the Monarchy that had suppressed the rights of workers, had seen the abuse of rights of women, and had thrown the country in total chaos.
The lower class was protected and there were no privileges associated with the caste system in the French society. Finally, there was democracy. A story is told of a wife of Napoleon Bonaparte who challenged the masses who had camped at the palace, hunger-stricken and demanding for food, that “if they did not have bread, then they should consider eating cakes”. Such was the gap in class, between the super-rich monarchy and the impoverished masses (Reilly, 2000). Of course, the revolution saw the end of this.
Otto Von Bismarck
Otto Von Bismarck was a statesman who believed in war as a way of solving problems. He united Germany and was very instrumental in the creation of the German empire in the 1871. His ideals would later alter the European State System. He advocated against foreign monarchies. He advocated for the open ballot system. A staunch believer in moral conscience, Otto Von Bismarck was a Prussian statesman who dominated European and German affairs due to his conservative policies. After stints of victorious wars, Otto unified most German states to form a powerful German empire. He was able to create a balance of power that saw political stability and peace in Europe from 1971 to the start of the start of the First World War.
He believed in diplomacy- a balance-of-power diplomacy-that saw Europe remain peaceful between the 1870s and the 1880s (Reilly, 2000). He loathed colonialism, arguing that it undermined the sovereignty of the colonized states. He believed in bureaucracy. He had a strong and an aggressive personality; had national and international visions. Many historians have popularly referred to his conservatism as “revolutionary co...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!