Technical differences between Disk Operating System (DOS) and Linux based operating systems (Essay Sample)

Technical differences between Disk Operating System (DOS) and Linux based operating systems Name Instructor Course Date Introduction Disk Operating System, is a well-liked OS for IBM PCs since 1995. It is an OS that can only handle a single job at any given time. The system relies on a command line interface, which requires users to provide commands to the computer. It offers a setting in which applications may be executed from removable media such as hard drives or floppy disks. Linux is a multi-user, multi-process, free, distributed operating system (R. P. França, M. Peluso, A. C. B. Monteiro, Y. Iano, R. Arthur, and V. Vieira Estrela, 2019). Linux has been the most widely used OS to date and a well-known open-source OS. It is an OS centered on UNIX which can run on both desktop computers and portable devices. Therefore, Linux is an OS designed for desktops, servers, data centers, tablet phones, and microcontrollers. This type of OS was developed by a global community and is freely available to the public. It is among the most extensively supported OSes since it works on a broad variety of computer architectures. Technical differences Certainly, there are differences associated with these two types of operating systems. DOS was designed for personal computers, whereas Linux was made for multi-user servers (S. K. Singh, 2020). In this case, Linux is a multi-user system, whereas DOS is indeed a single-user system. The Linux kernel allows for several processes to run at once, and each user may have multiple processes running at once. The Linux shell also provides task management tools but DOS supports only a single process. One more major distinction between DOS and Linux is that the DOS utilizes a command interpreter and Linux relies on a shell. When it comes to password protection, DOS and Linux are not identical. Unlike Linux, which only enables file password protection, DOS allows you to set a password for the whole directory. Evaluating compatibility and processors on all devices, DOS operates on Intel Processors as well as compatible devices while Linux is built for a very broad range of hardware platforms (M. Boras, J. Balen, and K. Vdovjak, 2020). Finally, the architectural framework of DOS allows for batch files, whereas Linux provides shell scripts. When compared to Linux, which uses a lot of energy, DOS has far lower power requirements. Unlike Linux, which has native support for IP networks, DOS does not have this capability. There are four different versions of DOS available: three paid editions and a free version called FreeDOS in addition to private distributions. On the other hand, Linux is available in a wide variety of free and open-source distributions. In contrast to Linux's prevalence on servers, DOS finds widespread usage in embedded devices. Linux contains both virtual memory as well as protected memory, but DOS does not. Conclusion There are deep cultural and technological roots connecting Linux to MS-DOS. They're essentially text-based OSes at their core, with graphical user interfaces built on top. Both tend to attract more dedicated experts than regular consumers. In the end, both grew into thriving development communities where many individuals contributed to free software projects. Despite this, DOS and Linux couldn't be more unlike...