Federal Criminal Case Against A Fictitious Criminal Offender (Essay Sample)

Circumstances and Details Involved in a Federal Case against a Fictitious Criminal Offender
Name:
Institution:
Course:
Course Unit:
Professor:
Date:
Introduction:
Federal crimes, denotes to felonies that infringe federal laws; which are investigated by federal police force as well as prosecuted by United States attorneys in federal courts by means of federal judges. The categories of federal crime include aggravated sexual abuse, attempt to commit murder or manslaughter, and killing or slaughtering a federal officer (Clarifacts, 2016). This paper analyzes the circumstances and details involved in a federal case against a fictitious criminal offender. It provides an account of the criminal offender, including the type of crime committed and the charge handed down by law enforcement; and particulars of the federal case outlining the sequential events from lowest possible level to the United States Supreme Court.
Description of the Criminal Offender:
The fictitious criminal offender is a forty-two-year-old male adult, Dr. Chaplin Jackson, a resident of Boston, in Massachusetts state and of sound mental status; a previous and prominent President of Chaplin's Real Estates Investments Incorporation. Dr. Chaplain is holder of a Master’s degree in Business Administration in finance from the University of Memphis, a bachelors in Business Administration majoring in valuation and land economy from New York University, a graduate diploma property investment and finance from New York University, and a professional license in real estates and business agent’s (Boyce et. al, 2010).[Callins v. Collins, Supreme Court of the United States, 1994. 510 U.S. 1141, 114 S.Ct. 127 L.Ed.2d 435.]
Circumstances and Details of the Federal Case Tracing the Chronological Events from Lowest possible level to the United States Supreme Court:
In 1996, Dr. Chaplain purchased a piece of land in Lowell, Massachusetts. Three years later, this is, in 1999, the United States Department of Treasury, was served with an anonymous indication of the president of Chaplin’s Real Estates Investments Incorporation mismanaging the Incorporation’s resources, and irregularities relating to taxable income of the Incorporation’s workers’ wages in addition to wages and tax info. In 2000, the Massachusetts US Department of Treasury-financial enforcement appointed a high-ranking official, Mrs. Perkins, Bella, to investigate the Incorporation’s monetary book of records, to establish any discrepancies. Consequently, Mrs. Perkins made a call to Mr. Chaplin, to request him to report and present at her office, the relevant documents pertaining to the matter. Unfortunately and without any explanations besides regrets, Mr. Chaplain never honored the required obligation. In response and in accordance with the law, Mrs. Perkins served Mr. Chaplain, with a warrant and lien of financial records; which resulted into Mr. Chaplain being arrested for fraud and embezzlement, but then again he was, later on, set free after securing a bail bond during the course of that day (Boyce et. al, 2010)..[Patterson v. New York, Supreme Court of the United States, 1977. 432 U.S. 197, 97 S. Ct. 2319, 53 L.Ed.2d 281]
In 2001, Mr. Chaplain being disgruntled with Mrs. Perkin’s actions forcibly accessed the Massachusetts US Department of Treasury premise headquarters and drove a hired van loaded with explosives, to the underground park. Since the park wasn't under any surveillance at that particular moment, he abandoned the van, and after a few hours detonated it; which resulted in the killing two hundred officials and staff of the Massachusetts US Department of Treasury headquarters, including Mrs. Perkins, as well as resulting in massive destruction of the building, information, and assets estimated in billions of United States dollars (Boyce et. al, 2010)..[R. v. Vickers, Court of Criminal Appeal, 1957. 2 All E.R. 741.]
In 2002, the Federal Bureau of Investigations, and other Massachusetts federal law enforcement agencies investigated the crime, and their findings lead to Mr. Chaplain being charged with homicide, domestic terrorism, capital murder, forcible besides unauthorized entry into a government facility, and obliteration of government assets. For the reason that, this was an atrocious crime, the Massachusetts Supreme Court, referred the case to the...