GOVERNMENT 2306 (Essay Sample)

Essay 1 (Choice B) TX SB 1861: Relating to certain public facilities financed, owned, and operated by a public facility corporation This bill was sponsored by Senator Jose Menendez and Representative Dan Flynn. The bill Act on relating to certain public facilities financed, owned, and operated by a public facility encompasses a broad directive on the operations of the public institutions. First, the public facility is defined by the role it undertakes across the state, for which under substantial circumstances it ought to cater for every service-related need by the taxpayer. This Act stands for the governments hand back to the people, simply because the public corporations are established to meet the needs of the people. And because the government should be of the people, by the people, and for the people, the relative provisions is or should be sensitized significantly to accommodate the dire needs of the people. From the entailment of this bill, it is apparent that it covers the very vital projection of the public with regard to goods and services. For instance, a state hospital is a public facility corporation that is limited to the needs and demands of the people, who are the very taxpayers. In the bill, the sponsors provide that a section (303.042) does not apply to the creation of a corporation that finances, owns, and operates a multifamily residential development to meet its first requirement. Creation of the corporations dealing at the family residential levels is deemed as important as the life-support machine is to the patient. The state government may rely much on such corporations to define its extensive role on the people, the number of achievements it has made with time, and so on. On another bill provision, the sponsors project that an exemption under the multifamily residential development section as created under the chapter and has not been described by the other subsection (d) only applies if its development meets the requirement of the following subsection (d-2), or rather it fulfils the governmental purpose. This provision advocates for the appropriateness of the corporation created to fulfil the ends of the purpose designed. Lastly, the sponsors indicate that if the corporation formed under the chapter have in its possession the multifamily residential development described in the (d-1) subsection, then the sponsor of the corporation should be positioned as the user of that public facility. This provision realigns the ownership and responsibility of the services provided to the public, such that if there is an accountability needed, it can be done accordingly. By dimension, this bill affects the state government and its capability to provide the vital functions, as well as its responsibility is impaired in the face of the public. Generally, to let loose the grasp of the public facility in a way that it can be possessed by a sponsor outside the government premises poses a great alarm to the state. This means that the multifamily residential development is one sensitive paraphernalia that the government utilizes in its monitory roles and therefore serves as the government eye to the subunits of the state’s society. This couldn’t succeed probably. Reference https://legiscan.com/TX/legislation/2019. Essay 2 (Choice A) Pros and Cons of Elected v. Appointed Judges The Texas Supreme Court is currently on a hot chair with the roles and functionality of the judges scrutinized and aired for concerns. Much debate is crisscrossing the efficiency and effectiveness of the Texas justice system to determine a qualitative role. This has been looked at in terms of the circumstance under which the chief judge or high judges get to rule; whether electively or appointed. However, both these processes have their pros and cons to be considered according to the team contributing their perspectives through videos and in written materials. The pros and cons of an elected judge include; The judges elected are more independent from the executive arm of the government. They oversee the judiciary system being entrusted by the members of public or government for reasons including integrity, transparency, loyalty, and incorruption, among others. Elected judge, more so, tends to defend the public than the authoritarians or statesmen. Their focus is on effective and appropriate scales of justice established in the public, since they don’t rely on the executive arm to downplay their mandates. However, the biggest challenge about the judges’ election has to do with money (Hoover, 2003). In competitive elections, judges contesting must have some substantial money and resources to climb up the ladder. Introduction of the elective exercise with money involved tend to bring in the divergent tactics, where corruption is introduced at the back door. So, the judge may be elected but the reality of his or her competitiveness is in question. T...