Should The Federal Government Provide Amnesty For Illegal Immigrants? (Essay Sample)

Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants
The topic of illegal immigrants is one which causes unending controversy all over the world. The idea behind such a classification is drawn from the concept of legal immigration frameworks, with the legal immigrants being those who follow due process and those who ignore any such procedures qualifying as illegal immigrants. The federal government, and by far the population of the United States of America are often divided on whether to offer or not to offer amnesty towards these individuals. On one hand, the proponents of such an action suggest that illegal immigrants offer the American economy a substantial input in taxes and investment while supporting the same with the suggestion that the bring in a unique cultural quality for America. The opponents of any form of amnesty argue this concept bitterly by suggesting that illegal immigrants derail the legally set systems of immigration thereby devaluing the entire constitutional law and taking away jobs from the legal citizens of America and the legal immigrants (Chomsky, 2018). However, there are several dynamics to this topic which lead to a stalemate, for example, the fact that the individuals detailed as illegal immigrants account for a large number and that they have families depending on them within or without the boundaries of America. The federal government should provide amnesty for the illegal immigrants within a set framework so as to reduce the processes enabling illegal immigration while maintaining the economic input accrued from these people.
Pros
The provision of amnesty towards illegal immigrants is necessary in light of their economic, social and labor based advantages. Chief amongst the identified benefits of illegal immigrants is the accrued economic benefit towards the American nation as a whole. Over the years the economic input of illegal immigrants has been estimated to be around 27.4 billion in taxes and related benefits (Chang, 2016). This figure is more beneficial to the nation within it rather than arguably outside since it can be channeled towards different monetary requiring activities such as the provision of social welfare related issues. The provision of amnesty to illegal immigrants would also prove critical to stabilizing their economic input through the depletion of the current monetary imbalance created by their immigration status (Chang 2016). Illegal immigrants are often paid poorly because of their illegal status, a factor which when coupled with the realization of their input towards the American economy should account for a reason to legalize their status within the nation. This concept rests on the consideration that since the illegal immigrants contribute a relatively large amount towards the economy of America as they are in their status of illegals, their contribution would arguably double or perhaps even triple, a factor which is only achievable through giving them amnesty (Abramitzky & Boustan, 2017). Similarly, the implication of providing amnesty for illegal immigrants is drawn from their work-related impact to the American economic sector. Illegal immigrants have been known to provide a critical input towards jobs that are seen as unwanted to the rest of Americans. Jobs such as the manual related activities of industry which most American consider less than critical to them have been taken up by the illegal immigrants people. Further, the social input of illegal aliens is visible in many of the lives of Americans, punctuating arguably every sector of American lives. The impact of illegal aliens towards the food industries, cultural events and arguably the business sectors is apparent with the projected illegal immigrant deportation proving a threat to such acculturation (Hainmueller & Hopkins, 2015). Therefore, the federal government should provide amnesty to illegal immigrants on the grounds of their valuable labor-related, economic and social implications to America, especially since any such move would definitely add value to America as opposed to perhaps deporting them.
Amnesty for illegal immigrants is a positive addition to America’s crime control, social inclusion, American dream propelling and a stabilization of the job markets in America. The giving of amnesty to illegal immigrants is a necessary step because deportation is an economic, social and political nightmare. The most critical recognition in this scenario is that America was built on immigration, a similar process to this that the illegal immigrants undertook to get into America. Consequently, the idea that any other illegal immigrant should be deported is inconsequential and would best be replaced with amnesty since every American principle relies heavily on immigration (Abramitzky & Boustan, 2017). In addition, the federal governments would provide amnesty for illegal immigrants because deportation of all illegal immigrants is easy to suggest but extremely hard to accomplish. Such a process would require door to door campaigns to ascertain every person’s nationality and papers, an economic upset that would require large amounts of funds, manpower and time. Similarly, amnesty for illegal immigrants is necessary to stabilize the job markets in America. Many of the illegal immigrants are paid meager salaries in America as compared to their legal compatriots, a factor which could easily disappear should the illegals become legal (Hanson, 2017). Through such a strategy, the concept of illegal immigrants would disappear giving way to a country where equal wages was a norm, a consideration that would have numerous ripple effects not only in America but also in the other nations where the immigrants channel their earnings. Further, the provision of amnesty for illegal immigrants is embedded within the American dream and strengthened by the ideals of that ethos. The ideals of the America dream suppose that every American is able to achieve a life through their hard work and because nothing, not even their immigration status should impede any such success. Therefore, by providing amnesty to these individuals, the federal government would be embracing the American dream and in connection to that eliminating the need for more immigrants using the same route.
The issuing of amnesty to illegal immigrants is a sure way to eliminate or drastically reduce crime in America. Through amnesty, the illegal immigrants of America could easily be detailed and documented, offering the policing authorities access to their records which would mean direct responsibility and access in case of criminal activity. The occurrence of issues such as terror and crime is closely related to illegal immigration. Often the issue of amnesty has also been challenged due to the relationship between the illegals and crime in America (Baker, 2014). However, this strategy can easily identify the perpetrators of such crimes while providing policing authorities with the documentation of the nationalities and residences of said individuals. Prior amnesty provision such as the 1986 one has also been proven to provide a 2-3 percent reduction in criminal activity after their effecting (Baker, 2014). Through providing amnesty, therefore, the federal government can reign in the crime and terror rampage within America while maintaining a workforce that channels economic benefits to America while still benefiting from cultural social and socioeconomic input that comes into America with illegal immigrants.
Cons
The provision of amnesty for illegal immigrants has negative impacts on the security, precedent, economic and labor-related aspects of American life. The most evident argument against amnesty for illegal immigrants is centered in the issues of their job-related implications (Chomsky, 2018). Illegal immigrants have been associated with the reduction of job opportunities for the legal residents of America. Many of these individuals are considered as the reason for lesser jobs for Americans, a reason touted for the argument against the provision of amnesty. Similarly, the non-registered immigrants of America are often associated with crime, a factor which fuels the argument against offering these people amnesty. The argument of insecurity is based on the supposition that a better scrutiny of entrants or migrants to the United States determines their criminal status or the lack thereof of the same (Menjívar & Lakhani, 2016). This consideration is touted as the major reason why offering such individuals would mean a threat to social security because background checks for the illegal immigrants already on American soil do not feature as an essentiality. In addition, the fact that many illegal immigrants would pose a slightly larger security threat to the populace of America becomes a solid argument against the federal; government providing amnesty for illegal immigrants.
The considerations of the economic impact of retaining illegal immigrants within America derail the idea of providing amnesty for the said people (Hainmueller & Hopkins, 2015). Certain studies have determined that retaining illegal individuals on American soil is relatively more expensive than the amount that they generate as economic revenue for America. While these individuals provide taxes and economic stimulation for America, their social security expenditure has been observed to be slightly more than what they provide the nation (Baker, 2014). Similarly, the precedent that the provision of amnesty would provide for the illegal immigrants would be detrimental to the American immigration process and society. While the precedent already set has not derailed illegal immigration, the impact of a counter action would suggest that illegal immigration is, in fact, acceptable, a factor which would effectively derail immigration procedures and probably lead to further...