Gay Marriage (Essay Sample)

Same Sex marriage
Name
University
Same Sex marriage
Introduction
All people deserve the rights that are offered by the state. Any person who pays taxes, abide by the law, serves the community must be afforded rights as citizens. However, not all people are afforded such rights. Same-sex couples are consistently denied such rights. Same-sex couples are denied their rights because of the sexual orientation. The discrimination against same-sex couples must stop because, just as heterosexual couples, they are law-abiding.
One of the main issues that plague same-sex marriage is that they are denied the right to claim their partner’s social security after he or she has died (Baunach, 2012). Human Rights Campaign groups, which function to attain equal rights for same-sex couples are supporting the efforts to achieve survivor remuneration for domesticated partners. Presently, there are no programs, which offer same-sex couples benefits such as those offered for heterosexuals’ couples. Same sex marriages are not able to claim benefits of their deceased, despite the fact that they are all working citizens (Bernstein & Taylor, 2013). Sadly, this leaves many same-sex couples with unsteady retirement, regardless of the fact that they pay survivor benefits. Same-sex couples lack of legal recognition affects them in many ways. The same-sex marriage argument is much deeper than whether or not they ought to reside together. If they pay taxes like the heterosexual couples, same-sex couples must be afforded the similar rights (Gill, 2012). In Baker v. Vermont, same-sex couples argued that they are denied protection of over 300 laws, as an effect of not being permitted to marry. As a result, the House of Representative of Vermont voted in favor of same-sex union bill. It is evident that Same-sex couples are not being perceived equally by law, and the initial steps of fixing this issue are just being taken (Rimmerman, 2014).
The fight for homosexual couples is for legal and not religious recognition. Most people against same-sex marriages concur that they do not hate same-sex marriages; they just oppose their lifestyle because of their church affiliations and religious beliefs (Corvino & Gallagher, 2012). The battle of same-sex couples to legalize their union is not to violate religious beliefs. Same-sex unions are to be acknowledged by the state and not by churches. Priest are not forced to conduct same-sex unions, it would be unjust for the state to decide what people should believe, such actions breach the freedom of religion (Corvino & Gallagher, 2012). Nevertheless, this does not offer the state the right to discriminate against same-sex couples. Lawfully, the state and religion are supposed to be separate. Whether, same-sex unions must be legally recognized is not a religious question (Bernstein & Taylor, 2013).
Conclusion
It is essential to isolate religious issues and view the debate from a legal perspective. It is essential for the state to acknowledge same-sex unions because all people in the society must be accorded similar rights reg...