Perfect research (Essay Sample)

Perfect research
Name
Institution
Course
Introduction
Research entails a detailed systematic investigation about a particular topic. The details go through an appraisal, hence facilitating the researchers to launch facts. The facts capacitate the researchers to institute conclusion in specified fields. This connotes that discovery entails a gradual process. Each step in the procedure is paramount to the ultimate objective of the research. The objective perpetuates a basis to new inventions. The remarks clearly illustrate the significance of research. Research is a systematic scheme that is capable to alter the globe. The fruition has an imperative influence towards life.
There are weak points of the investigation as well as the burly points. These two elements determine if the research is either excellent or bad. In each study, these two elements appear simultaneously. The magnitude of either of them qualifies the features of the research. The intensity of the elements dictates if the research is good or bad (Simon, 2003). The research qualifies to be good if the strong points have the dominant magnitude. The research is bad when the weak point bares the dominant intensity in the research process. For instance, the weak point of a particular research is scarcity of credible sources. If the factor of credible sources scarcity is dominant, the research is bad.
When the strong point of availability of credible sources is dominant, the research qualifies to be good. The existence of both factors in the research process is a clear impression that ideal research does not really subsist. In this context, perfect research is an absurdity. Research is an art that investigators must be experienced in it. An outstanding researcher criticizes the findings of other researchers. The researchers develop the findings of the primary researcher. This chain goes on with the change in time. In each season, a new invention emerges out of a modification of the primary research. Researchers are in constant competition to derive and articulate data (Simon, 2003).
In research, instructions disintegrate and simplify tasks. However, there is no specified correct channel of conducting research. The trial and error is a frequent mechanism in research. This method is not recommendable to reach a conclusion. Trial and error mostly gives exaggerated facts. Alternatively, this methodology perpetuates inaccurate conclusions. Since the method is chief in research, the results have a high probability to be incorrect. This is an apparent connotation that the projection for perfect research is deprived (Simon, 2003). The research conclusion is not always accurate. The judgment of the findings ought to be sound. Nevertheless, there is no defined way of making conclusions. This factor impedes hope for perfect research.
In the medical field, many inventions have emerged. In this field, researchers conduct researches and appraisals. The inventions in this field improve casualties’ lives. Nevertheless, imme...