1 page/≈275 words
Rene Descartes' Dualism Mistake (Essay Sample)
Rene Descartesâ€™ Dualism Mistake
By, Henry Nabea
In his Philosophical Psychology, Rene Descartes conceived human beings as being composed of two independent substances, i.e. body and soul. But a critical analysis of this dualistic conception of human nature shows that Descartes claim is false and untenable. This paper critically analysis Rene Descartesâ€™ dualistic conception of human nature by comparing Descartes position with the views of other scholars in Philosophy, who have differed with him. At the end of the paper, a conclusion is given based on the arguments adduced to support the thesis of the paper.
Descartesâ€™ Dualism Mistake
The problem of the relationship between the body and the soul is one of the main philosophical problems in the history of Philosophy. Philosophers, since the time of Aristotle up to the contemporary time, are dividend on how really, soul and body are related. In modern period, Rene Descartes is credited for having systematized the debate, and thus provoked a lot of interest in the debate. Descartes conception of the relationship between the body and the soul was perfectly in line with his dualistic conception of reality. In his Metaphysics, Descartes conceived reality has being composed of two substances: Thought and Extension. Descartes defined a substance as, that which can exist on its own, without depending on any other thing for its existence (cRyle, n.d). Following this dualistic conception of reality, Descartes saw human beings as being composed of two substances, i.e., the soul (thought) and the body (extension). However, Descartes understood the essence of human person not as a composite of body and soul, but rather as soul (thought only). So, according to Descartes, the body is not a part of a human nature, but it is necessary united to the souls to help the soul in perceiving external realities. But this dualistic view of mankind has received a lot of oppositions since the time of Descartes. A critical analysis of Descartes dualistic conception of human nature shows that, Descartes is grossly mistaken on this view.
The main argument that clearly shows that Descartes is wrong in his dualistic conception of the nature of human person is the fact that a logical analysis of Descartes claim shows that Descartes, actually, contradicted himself. Descartes began his argument by, first, asserting what a substance is, i.e., something that is self-existent. Descartes then proceeded to argue that human beingâ€™s essence is thought since one cannot doubt their own thinking self. In supporting his claim, Descartes contended that while we can, actually, doubt about whether we really have bodies or not, we cannot possibly doubt whether we are doubting. And on this basis, Descartes concluded that the essence of human beings is their thinking self or simply thought. Having concluded that the essence of human being is thought, Descartes proceeded to argue that apart from his thinking self, human beings also, have an extended body. And in supporting his claim he argued that since we can clearly and distinctly conceive ourselves as having extended bodies that interact and perceive external realities, it is true, therefore, that we, indeed, have extended bodies. And to answer the question of what is the importance of our bodies to our souls; Descartes contended that our bodies aid our souls in perceiving or sensing the external, extended realities. Descartes contradicted himself on this issue, by claiming that the soul as a substance is self-existent, and then proceeding to claim that the soul needs the body in order to interact and to perceive external realities. Descartes clearly contradicted himself. If the soul as a substance is self-existent, then the soul would not need the body for any reason. This logical contradiction shows that Descartes dualistic conception of reality is wrong and cannot be sustained logically. Once you claim that the soul does not need any other thing for its existence, then to be consistent, you should argue that the body is not necessary at all to human soul. But this claim is obviously untenable because from experience, as human beings, we know that we are not simply walking souls, and we know that once we die and our bodies disintegrate and cease to exist, we no longer continue to exist physically as human beings. This fact shows our bodies are, indeed, vital and essential part of human nature. It is impossible to consistently argue that the nature of human beings is either soul only or body only. But Rene Descartes advanced a strong argument in support of his dualistic conception of human nature and to support his claim that human nature is thought only. The following is the strongest argument advanced by Descartes in support of his dualistic conception of human nature.
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
- Ethical Principles: The Forms of Right Ethical PrinciplesDescription: Good ethical principles pronounce that people should do what they consider is it justifiably right to those around. Positively or negatively affect ...2 pages/≈550 words| No Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Different Individuals Regarding Their Positions In SocietyDescription: What role has class, race, and gender played in their lives? How do you see these stratifiers as playing a role, even if the interviewee is unaware of it?...5 pages/≈1375 words| 4 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Industrialization and Agricultural Analysis in GermanDescription: It is the third largest importer and second largest exporter of goods in the world (Malik 2015) most of Germany has a temperament cyclic climate which is good for agriculture...1 page/≈275 words| 3 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |