The Playing Of Violent Games Research Assignment Paper (Essay Sample)

Video Game Violence
Name
Institution
Video Game Violence
Development in technology has brought into query some of the regulations made in previous years. The playing of violent games by young children is protected by the first amendment CITATION Roy11 \l 1033 (Gutterman, 2011). Just like movies and books violent video are considered open to free expressions. The opposition of the law claim that placing a restriction on violent games will be a violation of freedom of speech regardless of the impact the games might have on the kid’s development. Freedom of expression is the right an individual has to express themselves fully without any restriction. The clear benefits of such a cause are visible. The only problem with such a clause is that it gives video game makers the permission to create video games with controversial messages that are not exactly correct. This message can be conveyed to the viewer by use of fictional characters, the tone of voice. The messages can have an enormous impact on children’s development; children may learn or develop bad habits and addictions from the fictional characters in the violent games.
A new category should be created since the first amendment does not consider the fact of violent games impact on young children. The freedom of speech and the permission to influence children’s development are miles apart regarding defining what is allowed and what is not CITATION Roy11 \l 1033 (Gutterman, 2011). A new category that will define which people are considered young and those who are considered mature enough to play video games. Video games have the ability to convey social messages and ideas through several mediums such as music, plot, dialogue, and characters. The first amendment fails to consider this crucial dynamic. The government needs to create a category that can be used to regulate, censor, punish and justify the breaching of rights.
The dictionary’s definition of the term “Democracy” fails to define who the “the people” are. Democracy Is controlled by majority rule CITATION DW16 \l 1033 (DW, 2016). When a decision is to be determined, the party with the most support wins the decision. Whether it is Bill, election or agreement. The majority usually decide what decision the government makes. Anytime the term “the people” is mentioned in any context concerning a decision-making then it usually refers to the majority. The majority should be allowed to control what the minority see and hear. When decisions are made by the minority, the majority deem that decision as unfair. To maintain balance, a transparent procedure has to be created for making decisions. Majority rule ensures that decisions always favor the majority and that no decision is ever made to support minority. This may seem unfair at first glimpse but it is the only way balance can be achieved. If more people lose then more people will be disgruntled, and this can have many adverse effects on the community ...