Comparing Renzo Piano And Peter Zumthor (Essay Sample)

Comparing Renzo Piano And Peter Zumthor Name Institution Affiliation Comparing Renzo Piano (1937) And Peter Zumthor (1946) Peter Zumthor and Renzo Piano are examples of geniuses of architecture who have contributed iconic work in the development of the industry. A deeper evaluation of their activities in the industry weaves a connection between the two experiences, an investigation of design and the human examination. The paper will deliberate how Renzo Piano and Peter Zumthor compare and how their theories are associated with the assessment of architecture and how their practices shape the implication of architecture as an industry and how young architects have benefited from the practice. Both Piano and Zumthor have a comparable principle in the exploration of design and its direct correlation to the attractiveness of human assessment. In an architectural board meeting, Peter Zumthor meets Renzo Piano over coffee to discuss the various transformations that have been realized in the industry. The meeting place is at the Global Architectural Committee Center in Chicago. The place is ideal for a meeting of such personalities in the architectural giants. The side of the meeting room has a sharply conical glass facade. The design has a stimulated exterior of a boat or shiny racing shell together with a long, thin construction with a curved bottom whose structure consisted of steel decorated with white paint. The building is well lit with various bulbs placed at close intervals. Additionally, the building portrays the use of the current paintings, modern art, sculpture as well as the architectural design. The two would find the place attractive given their philosophical emphasis on lighting in their designs. Their discussion starts with a narration of their previous encounter at a similar occasion in New Jersey. They also reveal of their close association and communication on issues of design. The two follow each other on Twitter making their communication and sharing of design ideas more contemporary. Renzo Piano points out the Modern Wing at the Art Institute of Chicago as having steered the wave of change in the industry. The rooms are excellently apportioned to give a clean industrialized look that is made conceivable by the shrill steel border edges coating the walls. The long floor-to-ceiling windows intensify the viewership of the galleries. The clear view of the neighborhood is crucial in the presentation of the assorted sculpture in the museum as well as the floor-to-ceiling windows overlooking the courtyard and park from some galleries. To a great extent, Peter Zumthor concurs with the argument citing the assistance the younger generation have acquired in their quest and aspirations to become professionals in the architectural industry. Renzo Piano asserts that the Modern Wing at the Art Institute of Chicago served to reflect, for the young architects, the relation between architectural and human explorations (Piano, 2002). Through this, the young architects could increase the presentation of museums all over the globe. Peter Zumthor hails the magic presented in the construction which makes the correlation between architecture and other forms of exploration easy. The way the building merges with the neighborhood is an ideal justification for these explorations. From the discussion of the two renowned architects, the essence of exploring and intertwining nature and architecture is suitable for the young and upcoming architects. The Kimbell Art Museum has also revolutionized the presentation of museums around the globe. The development and construction of the facility are ideal to the young architects to learn how to blend their materials. The construction aimed at increasing the spaces devoted to culture and art to encourage encounters between persons who study to see the world in a brighter dainty (Piano, 2002). The building was an improvement of Louis I. Kahn, which is connected by a glass corridor. Renzo Piano explains the motivation in using the matches in connecting the two structures. A careful examination of this building will offer the upcoming architects an opportunity to generate an atmosphere of limpidness and order which will influence future constructions. At this stage, Peter Zumthor reveals of the motivation that arises from the sight of this building.
Adapted from Santana S. (n.d.). A closer analysis of Renzo Piano’s architectural philosophy shows that learners in this industry have a lot to learn from the diverse constructions under his name. Piano’s concern in technology and recent solutions to design problems is apparent in all his projects, although he progressively took superior account of the construction’s context. Renzo Piano asserts that the use of these constructions in learning would create outstanding designs. According to Gieseking, Mangold, Katz, Low and Saegert (2014) architecture and design has to do with individuals, community, science, discovery, expertise, history, art, and exquisiteness. At this point, Renzo points out that the Museum is one with the constructions that provide whoever enters it with a feeling of instant happiness. Architects derive the philosophy of magical blending of some ingredients, elements, and lines which combine with other imperceptible components such as light culminate into ethereal spaces. Additionally, Renzo Piano reveals about his design for the Menil Collection museum in Houston, Texas from 1982 to 1986. In this facility, he applied ferroconcrete leaves for roofing which functioned both as a source of heat and ...