Distance-Vector and Link-State Routing Protocols (Essay Sample)

Distance-Vector and Link-State Routing Protocols
Student’s Name
Institution Distance-Vector and Link-State Routing Protocols
Distance is the cost of attaining a destination built in a number of paths followed by the host. According to Campista & Rubinstein (2014), Distance -vector as a protocol is the interface-traffic frequently forwarded out in order to reach a known destination of network along a specified route or path in a given network protocol. To this end, this protocol uses calculated distance and an outgoing network path to attain the best critical path. On the other hand, Link State protocol is a status tracking protocol comprising of all connection-numerous links. Additionally, the protocol is used to design protocol metrics used by network administrators. The paper will focus on the major differences between Link-State and Distance-Vector protocols.
As suggested by Campista and Rubinstein (2014), variation in operation and functionality of the above protocols the following differences arise. Distance vector routing utilizes nodes containing information for the next hop. For example, Node A may reach C and node B. On the other hand, in Link State Routing every node gives a complete direction of the topography (Campista & Rubinstein, 2014).
Secondly, failure in one node of a distance vector routing may make the whole routing system to malfunction. This is due to poor decision in routing hence giving a different output. Contrary, failure in one link state routing node does not influence the functionality of the whole protocol routing system (Campista & Rubinstein, 2014). This is because; the system can calculate a new route that can be followed by each path node. Lastly, taking the wrong direction in distance-vector routing affects the whole routing process unless the lost algorithms are re-conveyed. However, it is very hard to take a wrong direction in Link-State routing because the protocol requires each node to have consistent function in the network protocols (Hać, 2003).
In conclusion, it is clear there are functional and operational differences between Distance vector and Link-State routing protocols. These differences are bound to functionality nodes and network topographies. The s...