History: Republican Frame Of Government And Foreign Policy (Essay Sample)

The American History
Student’s Name
Institution of Learning
In the American history, there existed a pull relationship between a Republican frame of government and foreign policy. The political scientists battled to identify factors for the foreign policy decisions. These conflicts catalyze the civil war thus resulting in slavery and leading to antislavery, abolition, and emancipation. The American history is based on three principal concerns including the illustration of the various antislavery forms and the emergence of the organized movements, abolition and the consequences. Different groups and organizations such as religious figures, political economists, slaves, sailors and democratic enthusiasts among others, nurtured and extended this antislavery (Hinks, McKivigan and Williams 2007, 14). Slavery abolishment movements involved an integrated aggregation of political, economic, social and cultural forces with the abolition exercise being largely state-sponsored through legislative or juridical decision. To cite an example, the slavery ending of in the Northern parts of the United States during and after the Revolutionary War was entirely a legislative and juridical process. In Great Britain and the United States, there existed a great, organized antislavery movement before steps were taken towards the abolition of slavery. Numerous, influential figures opposed abolition and argued for the inferiority of those subjugated and their unfitness for freedom (Hinks, McKivigan and Williams 2007, 15).
Female abolitionists promoted democracy by taking part in social reform. Their organizing, writing and speaking work underscored the evils of slavery. Most of the Quakers women abolitionists were not of one race or mind. Though they took the blacks to be inferior, they never supported slavery but instead participated in women social reform programs. Angelina Grimke conflated the experiences of the oppressed, enslaved women thus beginning a new movement connection between the abolitionists and the feminists. Both white and black women were traumatized and humiliated, either by slavery or oppressive patriarchal hierarchy. Isabella in 1797 was sold while five years old, got traumatized, endured beatings, sexual abuse, and whippings as a house slave. In 1826, God guided her escape from slavery and found safety at the Van Wagener’s, feminist abolitionist’s home (Hinks, McKivigan and Williams 2007, 50-52).
In the United States, abolitionists argued that eliminating slavery would reduce the stigma associated with hard labor. Abolitionists saw the slaveholders league with the factory owners in promoting the white workers cartelization. Some abolitionists, impelled by British and American abolitionist leaders and Christian humanitarianism, felt the Northern employers needed to raise wage level. However, their desire for freedom of contract geared them to opposing the labor unions that advocated for increased wages (Hinks, McKivigan and Williams 2007, 457). The latter imagined whiteness community was strengthened by the affiliation of labor reformers with the antebellum Democratic Party, a proslavery, very satisfied with racial inequality. The black factory children starved and got overworked thus the rise of the English campaign in the early 1830s, to extirpate slavery with labor reformers advocating for a maximum of ten hours daily in factories. In Britain, Tory radical Richard emphasized on additional justice in wage slavery while Chartists reinforced people’s belief that real slavery meant the exclusion of whites from the suffrage. Gerrit Smith supported the movement to gain free homesteads for both white and black workers. The land reform movement formed a point of contact between the labor reform and antislavery movement (Hinks, McKivigan and Williams 2007, 458-459).
Kazin, Edwards and Rothman (2010, 886-897) discuss how the abolitionist reform movement influenced the party politics through the establishment of the Free Soil Party. The latter together with other political temperance reform increased the political interest of women. Women often called for equal rights with the aim of broadening demand for greater opportunities such as admission to different professions and trades, demand for higher education, independent economic rights extra. Temperance organizations were originally less controversial though more widespread than antislavery reform groups, with men first dominating them between1820s and 1830s. By late 1830s, women formed their independent organizations. Temperance reformers urged individuals to sign pledges to abstain from liquor and later agitated for laws outlawing alcohol. The formation of The Woman’s Christian Temperance Union (WCTU), in 1874 saw it became more responsible and essential to protecting the home. It was thus incorporated into the laws to restrict the manufacture, importation and sale of alcoholic drinks. The law addressed home related problems, such as poverty, the lack of labor unions as well as women’s subordinate status in politics and economy. However, Willard later discovered that only socialism would bring about justice in the society.
Most evangelicals strenuously opposed slavery’s spread into the Western territories. They later joined with non-evangelical reformers in 1848 and founded the Free Soil Party that prevented slavery in the territories. The party found support from other evangelical Protestants such as Reverend Joshua Leavitt, Emancipator, supported Free Soil. By assimilating the religious style of the former Liberty Party, Free Soilers drew the slavery opponents, both evangelical and non-evangelical, away from the larger Democratic and Whig parties. The antislavery evangelicals and free Soilers embraced the doctrine that it was okay for Christians to disobey legislation that contradicted the divine law. The Fugitive Slave Law made Northerners complicity maintain the ungodly slavery (Hinks, McKivigan and Williams 2007, 98-99). Free Soilers like Salmon Chase, J. Giddings, and Charles, p...