Double Consciousness Vs. Mimicry History Assignment (Essay Sample)

DOUBLE CONSCIOUSNESS vs. MIMICRY
Course:
Date:
Name:
Institution:
Double conscious and mimicry aspects of social identities, slavery of the blacks and word discrimination in the modernity reflects various facets of desirability of humanity. These two aspects were two sides of the same coin, which describe the hegemonic view of the world in relation to the olden historical view and the modernity. Pan-Africanism and the Pan-Africanists exceedingly verified lengthy colonial voices. These individuals assorted an exhaustively major war against slavery not only of the Afro-Americans, but also an all-inclusive African voice as a colonial state fully under the hegemonic West. Throughout the Imperialism and colonialism era, various unconscious and mimicry turn of events were overly experienced in the world politics. For instance, Equiano seemingly reflects both W.E.B Dubois and Homi Bhabha’s School of thoughts towards the epistemological explanation of the multi-lingual social identities in the world political history. This paper describes the double consciousness and mimicry aspects of social lives in relation to Equiano’s political, economic and social ideas.
Equiano enlightens history students in relation to the persistent imperialism and colonialism from the olden political environments towards the current ones. Imperialism, in occurrence, takes place when the governmental states of the hegemonic ones controls the economic, social and public interactionism of another state. Colonialism, on the other hand, represents an exceedingly autocratic imperialism where metropolis inhabitants take up residence peripherally in relations to the laws of the land. According to Brillman (2005), colonialism undermines legitimacy, power and sovereignty of various States. Consciousness and mimicry, therefore, represents enlightenment processes under which various Pan-Africanist individuals tried by all means to enlighten their fellow individuals on the governance process of the world politics. The imperialistic States were represented by Nigeria, Egypt, and Palestine. These States, accordingly, were the first to spearhead the fight against colonialism and imperialism where most processes were adamantly inclined towards the exploitation of periphery States by the hegemonic ones. In a more simplified way, Equiano identifies himself with a lot of modernity and discontents. According to this writer, modernity has overly reverberated in the world’s cultural theory and history thus resulting into unduly troubled suspicion in the world social, political and economic existence. Lastly, Equiano is largely confident as per the continental theorizing as it bears relevance historically in relation to socio-cultural identities.
Within terminology, Dubois, Equiano, and Homi view the colonized subjects in a different context. In order to conceptualize this, the British context must be blended in the political, social and economic aspects of epistemological worldview. For example, various forms of colonial authorities such as protectorate, crown colonies and spheres of influence were all inclined towards the hegemonic states. The crown colonies were offered a direct governance of the Westminster. The crown colonies were additionally fully governed by Westminster in cases of excessive rebellion. Another experience of mimicry and double consciousness was experienced during the Indian Mutiny of 1857 and Morant Bay rebellion of the year 1965. The crown colonies were under the jurisdiction of colonial offices and India Office respectively. These historians, inclusive of protectorates, also observed independent cases.
The protectorates were the semiautonomous areas under the governmental mandate and protection. In the protectorates States, the whole government was indivisibly under European residents who overwhelmingly oversaw their subject’s law and order. The direct overseeing of law and order by the Europeans were some of the attributed facts that led to the exemplified consciousness and mimicry of the multiple social identities. Various nations exemplified protectorate kind of governance though it was accepted side to side. The African states, for example, realized that there was a need for their capable elites to be fully in charge of their territorial boundaries. The spheres of self-rule contingency and influence were not necessitated by imperialism in the traditional sense, but by the far-reaching and devastating economic effects. As a result of consciousness and mimicry regard...