World Climate Change (Essay Sample)

WORLD CLIMATE CHANGE
Name
Course
Date
The climate is changing. The world is getting warmer each passing day, and there are apparently prodigious scientific accords that are taking place and are human-induced. Global warming being on the rise and living species feared to be dwindling, chances for the ecosystems to acclimate naturally are weakening. It is coherent to many that climate change may be among the supreme threats facing the planet. The trend from recent years displays snowballing temperatures in various regions of the globe as well as accumulative extremities in weather patterns. The world agrees that something ought to be fixed in regard to global warming and climate change. Nevertheless, the first stumbling block has been trying out various ways of getting an agreement on a framework. In 1988, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was formulated by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) to evaluate the scientific information on global warming. In 1990, the IPCC concluded that there was comprehensive international consensus that climate change was human-elicited. That report brought about an international convention for climate change; the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), passed by more than 150 countries at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992.
The United States of America together with a few other countries and many large organizations have antagonized climate change treaties ostensibly fearful of profit impacts if they got to make considerable changes to how they conduct business. Conversely, as more climate change related science has developed over the years, most businesses are accommodating this and even asking their governments for further action so as to see quick amplification on the new rubrics of the game so that they can get on with their businesses cleanly. The media has in turn also joined hands in distorting and bringing confusion in the seriousness of global warming. According to James Hansen (2010), the media has done a great disservice to the public. Some media care less about responsible reporting than selling their yellow press magazines, the quality of science reporting has declined.
For many years, big, powerful businesses and governments have been up against the philosophy of global warming. Many have drained a lot of resources into questioning what has more or less been accepted for a long time as true. Now, the mainstream is worried more about climate change effects and the dissertation seems to have shifted consequently. Some businesses that once betrothed in disinformation campaigns have on the contrary changed their sentiments, some going ahead and requesting governments for directives and course on this issue. However, few influential corporations and organizations are yet still attempting to challenge climate change actions and concerns. Will this entirely mean a diverse type of spin and propaganda with efforts at green washing and ambiguous information becoming the custom, or will there be a major shift in outlooks to see material solutions being proposed and implemented?
There have been worries that climate change negotiations will, in essence, overlook a key value of climate change negotiation frameworks: the communal but differentiated responsibilities. Comprehending that greenhouse emissions remain in the atmosphere for long, this principle identifies that historically:
• Developed nations have secreted far more greenhouse gas emissions.
• Opulent countries, therefore, face the prevalent accountability and burden for action to address climate change.
• Opulent countries also, therefore, must provision developing nations adapt; through financing and technology transfer.
Climate justice is usually ignored by many opulent countries and their mainstream broadcasting networks, making it much easier to blame China, India, and other developing countries for letdowns in climate change vindication negotiations. Development expert, Martin Khor, premeditated that taking antique emissions to account, the opulent countries owe a carbon debt as they have already used more than their fair share of discharges. Hitherto, by 2050 when certain discharge diminutions are needed by, their reduced discharges will still toll to have gone over their fair share instead of continuing down the trail of unequal development, developed nations can assist pay off their carbon debt by justly help emerging countries grow along a cleaner trail, such as through the lip serviced technology transfer, finance, capacity building inter alia. So far on the contrary, opulent nations have done little within the Kyoto decorum to lessen discharges by any meaningful quantity, while they are all in for negotiations on a follow on treaty that exerts more pressure to unindustrialized countries to agree on emissions targets? On second thoughts, the world was never a race course. Consequently, the more the delay in revolutionizing this menace the more the poor nations will have to restore the planet with their sacrifices (and if this works, as history would account, the opulent and dominant will find a way to rewrite history to claim they were the ones that saved the planet)
A contrivance suggested for combating climate change, and global warming have been the idea of using Carbon Sinks to absorb carbon dioxide. To help in this, afforestation and reforestation have been recommended. This is a common stratagem for the logging industry and countries with large forests interests. While there might be some potential in this resolution, it certainly cannot be operative on its own. This is as it legitimizes unremitting obliteration of old-growth and primeval forests that are rich ecosystems and have an established biodiversity base that naturally upholds the environment at cost zero. According to world resources institute (1998), an estimated 30%of the atmosphere is made up of carbon dioxide. Therefore fashioning new forest areas would necessitate the creation of the whole ecosystems. It is also carped for being a quick fix that does not challenge the root causes meritoriously and does not lead ...