Discussing a "Best Practise" when reviewing a case study (Essay Sample)

Discussing a "Best Practice" when reviewing a case study (Author’s name) (Institution Affiliation) (Course Name) (Date) Discussing a "Best Practice" when reviewing a case study Steps of Case Study Analysis It is considered coherent to use a structured control strategy in examining a case study since that makes the entire process easier and increases learning benefits. It is impromptu to read the situation thoroughly in order to understand the context of occurring situation. As such, the situation needs to be studied effectively & efficiently (Chrissis et al, 2003). For instance, a market researcher is advised to study rather quickly the first time to get an introduction to the market, the company, the people, and the situation. Defining the problem is essential for a case analysis. Many cases will include several problems or problems. Recognize the most essential problems and segregate them from the simpler problems. After determining what seems to be a major problem, analyze related problems in the running areas (for example, marketing, finance, employees). Efficient area problems may help you identify deep-rooted problems that are the liability of top control (Runeson, 2009). Company’s objectives should always be at the forefront of operation and risk assessment officers. Variance between a company's objectives and its efficiency may further emphasize the problems. At the very least, determining the company's objectives will provide information for accessing and managing current & future problems. Identify the restrictions to the problem according to Teagarden et al, (1995). The restrictions may restrict the solutions available to the company. Common restrictions include restricted financial situation, deficiency of additional manufacturing potential, employees’ restrictions, powerful opponents, connections with providers and customers, and so on. Constraints have to be regarded when indicating a remedy. Identify all the appropriate solutions. The list should all the appropriate solutions that could fix the problems that have been recognized. Use creativeness in coming up with substitute solutions. Even when solutions are recommended in the situation, you may be able to recommend better solutions (Schiffauerova, 2006). Select the best substitute. Assess each substitute in light of the available information. If you have properly taken the continuing five steps, the answer to the situation should be obvious. Stay away to leap to this phase early in the situation research. You will probably skip essential information, misunderstand the problem, or skip what may be the best substitute remedy. You will also need to describe the reasoning you used to choose one substitute and decline the others. Develop an execution strategy. The ultimate phase in the research is to create a strategy for effective execution of your choice. Absence of an execution strategy even for a very excellent choice can lead to catastrophe for a company and researcher (Sarwar, 2000). Determine and Define the Research Questions The first step in analysis studies is to establish a firm concentrate or rather specializes in which brand of product (Darke, 1998). The researcher determines the main points of the analysis by forming concerns about the situation or issue to be analyzed and determining an objective for the analysis. The analysis process is often a program, an entity, a person, or a people (Bellg, 2005). Each item is likely to be delicately connected to political, social, historical, and personal issues, providing far reaching possibilities for concerns and adding complexity to the analysis. The researcher looks into the item of the analysis in depth using a variety of data gathering techniques to produce proof that results in understanding of the situation and solutions the analysis concerns. Case analysis research analysis questions are known to begin with certain words like how, when, which or why (Bapuji, 2004). The concerns are targeted to a small number of events or conditions and their inter-relationships (Noe, 2002). To assist in targeting and developing the concerns, researchers conduct a literary works evaluation. This evaluation determines what analysis has been previously performed and results in refined, informative concerns about the issue (Christmann, 2000). Careful meaning of the concerns at the start pinpoints where to look for proof and helps determine the techniques of analysis to be used in the analysis. The literary works evaluation, meaning of the objective of the analysis, and early determination of the potential audience for the final report guide how the analysis will be designed, performed, and publicly reported (Groves, 2007). Select the Cases and Determine Data Gathering and Analysis Techniques During the design phase of research, the researcher decides what techniques to use in choosing individual or several real-life situations to analyze in depth and which instruments and information collecting techniques to use (Alavi, 2001). When using several techniques, each technique is treated as only one hypothesis. Each situation conclusions can then be used as information contributing to the whole research, but each technique remains only as a formulated question. Exemplary situation studies properly choose situations and analyze properly the choices available from among many research resources available in order to increase the validity of the research. Careful discrimination at the point of selection also helps erect boundaries around the situation (Yildiz, 2007). The researcher must determine whether to research situations which are unique in some way or situations which are considered typical and may also choose situations to represent a wide range of geographic regions, a wide range of size factors, or other factors (Bhutta et al, 1999). A useful step in the process is to repeatedly refer back to the objective of the research in order to focus attention on where to look for situations and proof that will satisfy the objective of the research and response the research concerns posed (Guest, 1997). Selecting several or individual situations is a key element, but a research can include more than one unit of embedded research. For example, a research may involve research of only one market and a firm participating in that market. This type of research includes two levels of research and increases the complexity and amount of information to be collected and analyzed. A key strength of the research method includes using several sources and techniques in the information collecting process. The researcher decides in advance what proof to gather and what research techniques to use with the information to response the research concerns. Data collected is normally largely qualitative, but it may also be quantitative (Hinkin, 1995). Tools to collect information can include surveys, interviews, documentation review, observation, and even the collection of physical artifacts. Bibliography Alavi, Maryam, and Dorothy E. Leidner. "Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and resea...