There is no hope of conducting perfect research (Essay Sample)

Name:
Professor’s name:
Class name:
Date:

There is no hope of conducting perfect research
In the year 1998, Griffiths (97) declared that there is no any hope of doing a perfect research. This statement remains a strife one with forces encouraging it as well as other forces opposing it. In order to understand Griffith’s statement, first one has to perceive the meaning of the word research. Research can be referred to as the study done to solve a given a problem or also to discover things which have not yet to be discovered. Research may refer to the act of investigating through a prior already done study so as to investigate and come up with a new finding which had not been identified during the previous study. In this modern day world, research is important going by the fact that it has resulted to the development and advancement of many inventions in both science and technology.
When one examines Griffiths (97) statement, one can come to the conclusion that there is no hope of doing a perfect research. Despite the fact that, at times, the research may tend to appear particularly promising, the existence of bias and errors has the reputation of some research into the question. The term perfect means the state of completeness without any errors, weaknesses or flaws (Bernard 64). The term perfect in the research context can be used to refer to a confirmed fact that otherwise has some imperfections which are sure to happen during the research process. The fact that nobody is perfect implies the state of a research being perfect is not a realistic conclusion in modern day world.
There are two main categories of research namely quantitative and qualitative research methods (Kothari 170). Despite the existence of these types of research methods, there is no any assurance that the results of a given research will be perfect. This has resulted in many researchers improve their methods of doing the research and also the results. The foremost challenge facing most of the researchers is the probability of research errors. There are two types of errors encountered by the researchers namely; systematic and random errors (Kothari 197). Systematic errors result from the use of fake patterns which occur between the observed and true values. On the other hand, random errors are unavoidable in quantitative research, and the only way to avoid them as a researcher is by minimizing them (Kothari 202). The existence of bias in research also leads to dissemination of the results. The different types of biases may include measurement and intervention bias. Another form of bias is when the researcher takes side when it comes for instance research topics or results. One cannot take no notice of the fact that the researcher has a large influence on the research results. This shows that the researcher can influence the whole of the research process simply by his/her personal bias.
In one of my undergraduate research on the effects of government CDF program on the economic attitudes of the rural poor household beneficiaries, I became aware that the outcome of the research would not be perfect. This is because I came to realize that most of the respondents had received apart from the CDF insentient from foreign...