There Is No Hope of Doing Perfect Research (Essay Sample)

Maurice O. Agonda Professor Benfil Kinyanjui Test Essay 20 June 2012 There Is No Hope of Doing Perfect Research (Griffith, 1998, p97) Griffith after conducting a series of research concluded that there is no hope of doing perfect research. Research can be termed as any original work and methodical study undertaken with the aim of expanding knowledge and understanding as well as consolidating facts and ideologies. The process may be creative or inventive. It implies hunt for knowledge again thus the term “re-search”. As a studious inquiry, educational or scholarly; investigations in research are critically executed and its main aim is to overturn some accepted findings by setting up new facts (McDougall 37). On the other hand, perfect denotes completely refined work that is devoid of faults. The work in question must be free of errors or any flaws whatsoever. According to Griffith, no research presents the final response in whichever subject, a fact which does not dent the importance of researching. I support the statement that there is no hope of doing perfect research (Griffiths 1998 pg 97). It is a wrong notion to entirely presume that research can be completely perfect. First, research depicts a recursive process regarding a long array of unearthing new facts in a particular field and documenting the same. In fact, some people consider research as a process whereby one moves from an unknown state to a known one. Research serves as an answer to man’s inquisitiveness. It is man’s nature to dig into facts in a bid to acquire a fuller knowledge and understanding of what is unknown. A single research may prompt further research so as to complement current findings; there is often some missing information which can only be revealed through conducting further research. Thus if research were to be ideal, then there wouldn’t be any need for further research on already researched subjects as well as other fields of knowledge. There would be no room for fresh research and new studies would be unavailable, and new writings would be but a time wasting venture. Particular findings and conclusions of one researcher may be completely disputed by totally conflicting views of a latter researcher conducting research on that very line (Powell 89). For instance, researchers in science have conferred that a soaring percentage of fats in the body utterly affect its functioning in a negative manner. Precisely, that surplus fat fabricates proteins with seditious hormone-like substances which foster the development of chronic diseases such as diabetes, obesity and heart problems. Moreover, another group of researchers have revealed that indeed the fats have some positive effects on the body (Powell 94). They observe that the body requires a certain proportion of fats to act as insulators galvanizing majority of the body tissues from shock. Consequently, substantial amounts of fats are required in the body for warmth that is generated by the adipose tissue comprised of fats. Another illustration of research that has enjoyed contradictory opinions over the years is the debate concerning the earth’s age. Archbishop Usher in 1654 maintained that the earth was formed on October 26th 4004 supporting his argument with genealogy of the bible. Some years later on in the 18th Century, Abraham Gottlod, a German geologist and mineralogist argued that the earth got formed via calamitous fashions which transformed the earth’s landforms (Dalrymple 12). He however did not cite any precise time regarding its formation. Ostensibly, both James Houghton and Bernard Palissy, who were scientists, claimed that the earth must have been over 6000 years old by the 18th century, a theory which literally contrasted the previous views. In 1897, Lord Kelvin estimated the age of the earth to be 24-40 million years, his calculations being based on the law of dynamics. John Joly, in 1899, derived other findings estimating the age of the earth to be ultimately 90-100 million years. Basing most of these estimations concerning the age of the earth on evidence derived from study of rocks, the findings will always be divergent (McDougall 45). The scientists in most cases then disagree in their findings, thus leaving room for further research. If Alexander Graham were to come back to life, he would perhaps die of surprise stemming from advancement on his 1876 telephone invention. As a result of curiosity, res...