Comparative Employment Relations (Essay Sample)

Writing
Comparative Employment Relations

Customer’s Name
Customer’s Grade Course
Customer tutor’s Name
Outline
This is a paper which gives a precise discussion on the following areas of discussions which relate to employment relations in the world with specific examples being given for a clearer understanding. The first one is in comparing and contrasting the system of employment relations in Australia and Sweden, and also for Australia and Japan. After that there is the analysis on to which extent the systems of employment relations have changed since 1945. The paper also gives an evaluation on the role that international organisations have played in employment relations systems, and finally on the issue of globalization theories.
Comparison between the Role System of Employment Relations in Australia and Sweden
Collective bargaining in terms of employment relation is something that differs depending on the nations. For instance, Australia is known to have the most of the restricted ones among the entire developed world. Basically, the issue of collective bargaining in Sweden is controlled by social role and it is applied in the level of industries. The role of trade unions in Australia is to advocate for the rights of the employees as well as to advocate for the social rights of their members (Rodger, 2008, P. 32). On the other hand in Sweden the trade unions mainly to coordinate the process of bargaining for the wages of the employees. The role of employers in Australia is to ensure that the workers are provided with the right and favourable environment to work in while the work of employers in Sweden is to supervise and pay the employees.
The role of the state in Australia as far as the issue of employment system is concerned is to provide the legal requirement as far as the any issue is concerned. All polices and the laws are included while in Sweden, the state is involved in providing employment opportunities to the many people of its population that are not working (David, 1999, P. 200). The state of the economy in Sweden has provided an opportunity for the people to get employed since it is in a state of getting improved. While the economy of Australia being greatly dependent on agriculture, is offering employment on that sector to many. This means that there is a great difference between the two countries. It is therefore, just to say that the employment system in Australia is much better.
In the two countries, there have been a number of differences when it comes to the nature of collective bargaining. Such has been greatly pronounced in Australia in comparison with Australia. Such has been the case due to the fact that the country is a more pronounced socialistic economic (Rodger, 2008, P. 39). This has reduced level of individualism and thus collectivism has always been promoting bargaining, something which is in contrary to the individualistic Sweden society. The issues of trade unions have been more pronounced in Sweden and not much as with Australia since the economic systems favours the greatest majority of the population. This means that, in a country like Sweden, which is a pure capital economy, there has been a proliferation of collective bargaining and trade unions which help in addressing the issues of the greatest majority. The employers range from agricultural to industrial while in Australia there is the tourism sector and entertainment and the government sectors which have been employing the greatest majority of employees.
The states in the two nations has been playing a great role in establishing the trade patterns and employment relations between employees and employers, and this has been achieved through the adoption of policy implementations which have been effective in such nations. Another important worth considering is the state of economy in the countries. For instance, the economy of Sweden is much stable and has been able to have better employee-employer satisfactions which are not the exact thing with Australia (David, 1999, P. 36). However, the two economies have significantly been heavily impacted by the present economic crisis. However, with the new adoptions which have been put in place, there has been the constant redress of employee issues, and as well there have been legislations and innovations which have been aimed in making sure that there has been the adequate realization of goals and as well provide majority of the populations with the best employment opportunities and by so doing improve the overall statuses of the economies. The approach has been in coming up with measures which address the present economic meltdown and coming up with a promising plan for the future performance.
Comparing the System of Employment Relations in Australia and Japan
There is a very distinct difference between the role of collective bargaining with reference to employment in Japan and in Australia. While in Australia, it is known to have the most of the restrictions on the workers, being under developed countries in Japan it gives the employee’s a chance to ask for their right and a room for reconciliation between them and the employers. The role of trade unions in Japan is basically to give all the employees a platform to negotiate for their terms and conditions, while in Australia is to advocate for the rights of the employees as well as to advocate for the social rights of their members (David, 1999, P. 356). In Australia, the role of employers being to ensure that the workers are provided with the right and favourable environment to work, in Japan their role is to identify the individual needs of the employees and then deal with them.
The State in Australia is concerned with providing the legal requirement as far as the any issue is concerned. All polices and the laws are included while in Japan, the state is responsible for the provision of equal opportunities for employment to each and every person as well as economic opportunities to all companies in the country. The state of the economy right now in Japan is responsible for providing better opportunities for everyone in the nation while in Australia it is to provide opportunity and help to them that are in the agricultural business and industrial business being the greatest income generating departments. This means that the employment system in Japan is better off and it is mindful of everyone despite what they are involved in (David, 1999, P. 79).
Australia and Japan are two nations which have been having varying patterns and developments which define their employment patterns. For instance, the fact China and Japan are some of the well known nations which have been founded on very stable social societies and with self proclaimed socialism, it is worth noting that there will definitely with a number of differences which come along with the developments which have taken place in history. Australia is a capital economy and thus the two nations shall have varying developments and modalities with their employment patterns. The employment relations in Japan are thus stable with more and more individuals involved in business and other economic processes. This has seen increased employment rate thus helping in economic development and establishment. This has seen reduced collective bargaining in comparison with Australia which has different economic and employment relation and systems (Rodger, 2008, P. 32). The trade unions are not pronounced in Japan as compared with Australia. The Japanese economy has well employed individuals, something which has been positive for the economy. However, in the two nations, the states have been playing diverse roles and policy implementations which have great influences on the business performances and realization of economic goals.
Japan happens to have a far much stable economic status in comparison with Australia. In that case, Japan has been able to achieve better economic performance and thus creating the largest employment opportunities. This has encompassed the fishing and the manufacturing industry which have been able to employ very many people (Indiana, 1994, P. 15). Going by what has been learned with the employment relations between different groups such as employees, employers, the state and the economy, we can see that the two nations have the potential of advancing their economic missions, and by so doing we shall have a much stable economic for each nation. Looking at the presently portrayed trends in the employment relations, we shall predict better performances in the coming days since the two nations have been intelligently involved in addressing the problems of the current economic crunch which has been hitting such nations presently. Basically, the economic systems in the nations have been greatly influencing the employment relations, and thus governing labour provisions and thus being able to give guidelines and legislations which govern the workplace performance.
Analysis of the Extent to Which Changes in the Systems of Employment Relations Since 1945
There has been a record of great transformation in the systems of employment all over the world. This is due to a number of factors of which the most significant is the industrial revolution. In Asia and Australia for instance, there has been a great transformation due to some of the challenges that have been experienced a change was automatic. Most of the employment relations have for instance changed from being the ones that are concerns with peaceful labour and stability to a point of great demands in flexibility. One of the reasons for such a drift is the change in the social, political and technical environments (Rodger, 2008, P. 67). These changes in the external environment are very instrumental in initiating changes in the employment system in terms of requirements for the workers and also the payment. Also due to the issue of comp...