The Complete Persepolis (Essay Sample)

Name
Course
Instructor
Date of submission
Impact of the author’s memoir in writing the book
The author, Marjane Satrapi utilises her life experiences to lay out the entire narration of the book. That means that most of the stories are inspired by the life of the author. From an analytical point of understanding, the book is published in four distinct instalments. They track the entire life via a series of short vignettes. There are several proofs that assist in ascertaining the opinion that the book depends on the life experiences and encounters cited from the life of the author (Satrapi 2). For instance, the novel follows Satrapi’s life commencing from the moment she was young in Iran. That was after school In Austria, returning to Iran and the final move to France. The novel tries to establish Satrapi’s successional struggles to ascertain and rectify a series of the constraints in laws and religion that existed in the country’s system. The fact that she is a woman and that the society she resided in was oppressive to the women (Acho 12). The storyline explains the extent in which the women were placed under strict restrictions. A perfect example is that the story elaborates and gives examples of poor and appropriate decisions that she sanctioned and the lessons she embraced from the mistakes. For instance, the book indicates that the author learned that the women were suppressed a great deal in the Iranian Islamic contexts. Therefore, writing the essay was guided by the authors’ life experiences and her ultimate inferences with regards to the kind of treatment that women received (Acho 15).
The comparative context of the book
There are different approaches that the author expresses in terms of who and what is supposed to be done in the Middle East. The author, therefore, writes from a comparative context trying to establish the difference in treatment and approaches between Iranian life, Austria and France. The three destinations that are part of her life biography are stringent and efficient entities of ensuring that the book attains the intended value or purpose (Satrapi 4). For instance, the book tries to expedite an intensive history of Iran and the series of mistreatments and misconceptions that exists in the laws of the place. However, the author also attempts to compare the trends of life with those of other areas such as the United States. A perfect example of such a scenario is that of the situation where the author expresses the freedom that people in the United States have freedom as compared to those in Iran. Accordingly, the author tries to create a comparative mood that feasibly becomes the source of originality in the novel. The few elements that the author tries to outstretch the novel include those of producing knowledge about Iran to the rest of the world. The writing also seeks to establish the reality that exists in the Middle East Iran that makes the regions quite complex than the other areas of the world. Most importantly, the storyline of Marjane Satrapi takes place during the late years of the 1970s (Satrapi 35). Further, they take place in the Iranian Capital city of Tehran. The context of the book is historical, as well as, comparative because the author reflects upon her life in different parts and cultures of the world.
The assumptions employed in the text
There are several assumptions that are applied in the text. These assumptions are differentiated with regards to the context of analysis. Remember, the author tries to create a comparative scenario throughout the text. It is within this element that a series of assumptions feature. First, the author makes an assumption that the lifestyle and trends in the other parts of the world are better than they are in Iran (Satrapi 8). The extent to which the assumptions feature where the author is said to act strangely by walking on the streets just like the youths do in other parts of the world including the United States is a perfect example. The author assumes that it is the best thing for the youths to have the freedom and liberty to walk the corridors and streets. The author also overstretches her mandate by generalising the stereotype of Iran through the use of collective analysis. That is; she tries to express to the leader that her life was just an example of what many faced in Iran during the era of revolution. That means that she creates an amicable balance between the terrible moments and the happy moments she had to face. Further, the author assumes that the western cultures are a privilege and that they bear an ethnocentric universality. However, she fails to address the inadequacy of self-consciousness associated with the western culture. The assumptions act as a very imperative instrument in ensuring that the text
The author’s major arguments
The author bears a series of arguments as far as the text is concerned. She aims at opening a window into the mysterious, as well as misunderstood world and practices in the Middle East Iran. The most important thing to site is that the author expresses the extent to which the life in The Middle East was quite complex and hard to live. She expresses the extent in which she believes that life in Iran is worse-off compared to that of other areas in the world. There are two contradicting arguments that the author tries to execute in the text. First, he argues that life in the Middle East is not attractive at all due to the chain of complex rules. Alternatively, the author postulates the contradictory argument that the book is comprised of a creative memoir implying that there is hope for the future of Middle East (Satrapi 31). Satrapi challenges and addresses the global view of Iran. She does that by suggesting the extent in which the western practices, as well as, fads are incorporated within the traditional culture in Iran. She establishes a series of examples in which the Iranian society is perceived to be different from others. For instance, she gives an example where the media shows Iran as a hub of bombings, women oppression, killing of militants and black veils. However, she decides to establish a different perception of the Middle East Iran. For instance, she establishes characters that act as good examples. She shows optimal support for future after the revolution that was underway. The author tries to balance between the affirmative assumptions and the negative perceptions of Iran by the means of narrating her real life experiences.
Contradictions present in the text
The text is subject to several contradictions. The subject of concern in the text is the kind of life that people live in Iran. Most importantly, the text looks at the life experienced by the youth’s and women amongst other groups in the society. Initially, the author represents Iran as one of the areas where absolute restrictions prevail upon other things (Acho 21). For instance, the author gives a gesture of walking on the streets in a bid to show how free the world outside there can be. From an explicit level of analysis, the practices of the American youths is declared to be strange and forbidden in Iran. That means that the practice is an explanation of the kind of complications that exist in the Iran. The Iranian culture tends to be quite restrictive as compared to the other cultures around the world (Satrapi 2). The author also shows that Iran is not as people perceive it to be. In fact, the author believes that it is wrong for people assume that Iran is not a suitable place for people to reside. Instead, the author believes that there is absolute hope in the country. In fact, she insists that there is a likelihood that the world will revolutionaries and form a better territory. The most controversial aspect of the text revolves around the argument that Iran has hope and the outstanding perceptions (Satrapi 11). That suggest Iran to be one complex place to live especially with regards to the fact that there are many restrictions. The idea of having role models in a society that is restrained by rules is quite controversial.
Evidence that the author finds essential in making her assertions
The author of the text provides essential assertions with substantial evidence. The author starts by giving a life biography which sets the pace for the entire text. Arguably, the author uses her life experiences and travel from Iran, to France and Austria as a perfect source of information and assertion. For instance, the author uses her experience in the Iranian territory to express her experience as a woman and youth. It is after she lives in this region that she manages to identify the major challenges tha...