Eric Forner's Argument and Human Rights (Essay Sample)

Student’s Name:
Professor’s Name:
Course:
Date:
Eric Foner’s Argument and Human Rights
I do not agree with Eric Foner's argument. I think that the language reason for World War II did not play to lay the foundation for after war ideas of human rights that have now extended to all humankind. In a broad spectral view, the human rights brief profession in the 1940s is the story of how allied states elevated the human rights language into self-determination of nations. After the war, human rights emerged as a collective entitlement to self-determination; that was the desire of many globally at the time. In this new endeavor, the extent that people could identify a notation of the human rights rhetoric, allied nations in the war saw it a prize for consolation.
It is a surprise that in the 1940s when the "human rights" entered the English language, the occurrence was accidental even unceremonious. The truth is that human rights commenced as a very minute part of a hopeful alternative vision to bring down Adolf Hitler's tyrannical and vicious new order. However, at the height of the war and shortly after that, a view of after war collective life marked with personal liberties coalescing into promises of social democracy primarily motivated fighting the battle.