Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
You are here: HomeEssayHistory
Pages:
6 pages/≈1650 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Level:
MLA
Subject:
History
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:

Progressive Reforms in Our Government (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

Final Exam: U.S. Since 1865
The purpose of a take-home exam is to give you an opportunity to write a well-reasoned and well- written analysis at your own pace. My expectation is that the removal of a time pressure will enable you to do your best work. A successful exam will illustrate that you have read and understood the assigned course materials, that you understand the difference between primary and secondary sources, and that you can formulate your own analysis of both types of sources.
Primary Document Analysis (2 pages)
Read Jane Addams, “The Subjective Necessity of Social Settlements,” and address the following
questions:
- Who created this source and why?
- What elements of this source offer insight into the principles of Progressivism?
- How does this source (a primary text) connect with secondary sources from this unit? In
other words, analyze the text in the context of your readings.
- What does this document reveal about the ideas and practices of Progressive Era reformers?
- What questions or complexities in the document require further analysis?
You might also consult the handouts on document analysis already posted on Moodle. Your goal is to show you can read and comprehend a primary source, connect it with a secondary source (or several), and analyze and explain the significance of the source.
Synthesis (4 – 5 pages)
Many of our case studies have somehow engaged questions about the role of government in everyday life. Our nation has just completed another election cycle, and we are still watching politicians debate the role of government in terms of race relations, labor conditions and wages, immigration, welfare, and a host of other challenges. To offer a crude sum up of the positions: conservatives argue that less government intervention offers citizens more freedom, while liberals argue that some government intervention is vital to expand democracy and freedom. We know the matter is more complicated, so your challenge is to make sense of these current debates by reaching back into your history to select two case studies that will enable you to reflect on how citizens perceived the role of government, asked for more or less governance, acted on behalf of the government, or resisted government intervention altogether. Describe the people and issues involved, and analyze whether you think the federal government could have played a constructive role in resolving the issue(s) in question.
Select your examples carefully; they should enable you to draw on a range of evidence (primary and secondary) from class readings. Do not consult readings outside of our syllabus.
Details
Please label each answer, but staple the two together. Exams should be typed in a standard 12-point font, with clear citations, and pages numbered.
Finally, I want you to follow the style conventions we have been using all semester: paraphrase and quote selectively, and always cite your sources using the Chicago Style or the MLA format. If you do not cite your paraphrases and quotations, it is plagiarism, and you will receive an automatic F on the exam, and possibly for the course. For primary sources, simply use the title of the source and its date. I strongly recommend that you review previous papers to diagnose what you do well as a writer and what still challenges you. Examine my markings and comments as a way of preparing final exam answers that do not repeat the same errors. Also, make sure you spell check! Essays that show carelessness in grammar, punctuation, and overall structure will be marked down. Finally, check the writing guidelines I posted on Moodle. If your paper features many of the errors listed on that sheet, your grade will suffer. I have given you the tools to do well, so I hope you use them.

source..
Content:
Name:
Instructor:
Course:
Date:
Progressive Reforms in Our Government
Writer of the source
Jane Addams born in the year 1860 was part of the first generation of women who got educated up to college level in America. One of the things that frustrated her was the lack of opportunities for women seeking professional careers. In 1889, Jane Addams founded the Hull House settlement. She was inspired by reformers she met in England during her career. She dedicated her life improving the lives of the poor through education, social science research and political action. Her ideas are best understood through her essay “The Subjective Necessity of Social Settlements” from her book “Hull-House” published in 1892 to put forth the ides of humility and cultivating young people who have no outlet for active faculties.
The Subjective Necessity of Social Settlements
The issues she addresses at the times can be largely associated to issues in current social structures. This essay presents a variety of social progressivism principles that can be applied in modern world to address similar issues. Progressivism is usually tied to the modern freedom principles and the welfare of the state which in itself holds that transforming a society can be achieved through centralizing the government that has enough power to remake the ideals of a society. Some of the elements that represent progressivism are for instance, including a society in the war against poverty among others that are geared towards the wellness of a society. However, critics of the progressive movements argue that these reforms do not account for consequences that are not intended. They further cite that the movements are based on misunderstanding of human conditions and also fail to acknowledge the evils of the world. Jane propagated a variety of progressivism principles through her deeds. Her principles can be best understood if we understand the motive of her subjective necessity for social settlements as based on conviction rather than emotions.
Elements offering insight into the principles of progressivism
First of all, the movement was based on the principle of desiring to make the entire social organism democratic and to spread it beyond political realms. Together with others explored the liberty in human societies by observing how the young people in the society are socialized towards democracy. Jane first addressed the situation with the American young people. She says that, young people have no recognized outlet for their active faculties. They hear constantly of the great social maladjustment, but no way is provided for them to change it, and their uselessness hangs about them heavily (Addams, 1930). By this, she perceives at democracy as a system that has made very little effort towards addressing issues in social affairs. Further, it argues that we are still holding to the ideas that were held by men in the earlier centuries who believed that political equality was enough to guarantee good to all men. Many instances of acts of democracy are highlighted in some deeds that are deemed democratic even though they do not seem to solve the issue of social affairs. For instance, the suffrage of women and the peaceful resolution of international conflicts were some of the few democratic endorsements by the movement. These actions do not however resolve the issues that are considered to be the core issues. In reality, they only address the consequences of the issues. Thus as observed, they do not address issues in the social perspective rather in the democratic realms. The social structure is to a large extent broken down into different entities where some are living very poor and a majority with no leisure or energy for anything recreational. They rather live in system of sustenance moving from one wretched social system to another (The Subjective Necessity of Social Settlements par 1).
The second perspective is the desire to share with and bring accumulated social services to and social energy to portions of the society that have little. Basically, the claim here is that most social groups had never had massive social advantages thus; they do not necessarily need them. In assumption, only political philanthropy can change them. This is one of the concepts that usually stratify a society between the affluent group and the poor social group. Jane’s movement targeted at creating a society that would have a narrower gap for the two groups. Through teaching social sciences and providing education, the movement would enable the young aged to grow to be independent.
The last aspect is connected with Christianity’s perspective towards humanism. In this aspect, she argues that there is a desire to share the lives of the poor, the desire to make social service, irrespective of propaganda, express the spirit of Christ, is as old as Christianity itself. This aspect claims that for Christianity to be revealed in social progressivism, it should be done on the simple outcome of the proposition that man’s deeds are largely connected to the way he interacts with his fellows. By the simplicity of this principle, the movement formed a strong and enthusiastic concept of help towards humanity. Many things can be attributed towards Christianity and humanism for instance the early Christians did not preach the end of the world neither did they tear temples. Rather, they sacrificed themselves for the weak, the children and the aged people in the society. Such actions are to be embraced by the movement for towards its goodness to the society (The Subjective Necessity of Social Settlements par 4).
Connection between the primary and secondary sources
The principle of progressivism can also be traced in modern democracies and social help groups. For instance in understanding the role of the government and the expectations the citizens have of the government. There has always been the question of government’s contribution to freedom of the people with some arguing that more intervention by the government will bring more freedom to the people. Through the principle of progressivism, we explore the contribution of a government towards people’s freedom.
Sometimes, democratic governments can violate the rights of citizens. Several incidences can be pointed where such governments have deliberately violated citizens’ rights. Another issue that is of concern is who comes to the rescue of people when the government violates the rights of citizens? When this happens, it’s other concerned citizens that use another part of the government – usually the court – to stop the other part of the government from violating the rights and freedoms of the people. Organizations like American Civil Liberty may be formed by citizens to protect from the freedoms and rights violation by the government (Government Is Good par 1).
Ideas and practices of progressive era reformers.
Basing the government’s role on the first aspect of Jane’s movement of desire to make social and democratic change; the government is expected not only to create equality in political realms but also have a significant effect on the social lives of the citizens. The government should strive to eliminate social strata that continually widen the gap between the rich and the poor. Through such initiatives, the young population that Jane claims to have no knowledge of what to do will have at least a bases of what they are supposed to do in order to develop themselves.
This young life, so sincere in its emotion and good phrase and yet so undirected, seems to me as pitiful as the other great mass of destitute lives (Addams, 1930).
In line with the second aspect, to share with and bring accumulated social ...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

  • Mexican Civilization
    Description: Identify 3 areas of intellectual/cultural production in the evolution of Mexican Civilization...
    1 page/≈275 words| 2 Sources | MLA | History | Essay |
  • History: Civil liberties and National Security
    Description: Historically, civil liberties have been ignored in times when there have been calls for improved national security...
    4 pages/≈1100 words| No Sources | MLA | History | Essay |
  • Roman civilization, Christianity, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle
    Description: Discuss the origins of Christianity? Who was Paul of Tarsus? What contribution did he make to Christianity? Why did it ultimately survive and succeed?...
    8 pages/≈2200 words| No Sources | MLA | History | Essay |
Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!