Argument Pertaining Capital Punishment (Essay Sample)

Argument pertaining capital punishment
Introduction
The argument pertaining the abolishment or continuous adoption of capital punishment by the state has been the point of debate for so many years. The problem which surrounds the issue of murdering or not murdering a person who has been alleged to have committed a crime is always a problem question. The problem is highlighted in every argument in discussion specifically in the effort to fix the penalty whether sentencing an individual to death or not. All these arguments make the capital punishment hard to implement hence need to be debated to unravel the dilemma surrounding the whole question.
Capital punishment has been used in a countless countries in the world because it is considered as a way of imposing some fear to individual who are planning to commit the crime in the future (Drake &Deborah, 201). Capital punishment makes them to fear the death penalty imposed to them if found guilty. This concept has been successful in eradicating crime and deterring those who are planning in future to commit similar crimes. Capital punishment in the United States was mainly intended to people who commit crimes ranging from murder, violence and treason. This subject made powerful figures and reformers from other countries to propose life imprisonment as an alternative because it cannot kill innocent citizens as compared to death penalty (Zoltan, 38).My purpose in this research therefore is to demonstrate how capital punishment has remained unsuccessful in the United States and many other countries in the world in its execution .The ineffectiveness of the systems in eradicating current and future crime rates means that the system has failed and need to be abolished. Therefore, the issue needs to be avoided because it undermines human dignity.
Argument against Capital Punishment
In my opinion, capital punishment should be abolished since it is an act of violence which is inhuman in nature as it concerns the targeting and killing of an individual. Using the capital punishment in the society as the solution for the crime is itself conflicting therefore making capital punishment legal as a solution for the crime committed will be inconsistent with the human values and dignity. 
Death penalty in race and rape
In the United States, the weakness in the judicial system has resulted into many blacks being convicted to death penalty as compared to the whites (Lawrence &, Goodheart, 59). The statistics as depicted by Connecticut article reveals that minority groups mainly blacks are highly convicted than the white counterparts and their death sentence is usually final. Capital punishment has resulted into racial disparities in the imposition of capital punishment. According to Goodheart article, capital punishment is depicted as an act which favors only whites. The black men were discriminated during the colonial period by being convicted for the rape against the white women. This crime leads to the hanging of five black men for the violent compared to the one white man (Lawrence &, Goodheart, 59). This effect illustrated that no sentence was imposed or administered to those who committed the crime against the native America and African American woman. Capital punishment opens up the debate of the pattern of prejudice in the world. It raises the subject of the kind of control, customs and morals issues it advocates in the world. According to Connecticut article, the history of rape in the society points out the higher number of blacks sentenced to death compared to the whites yet the black population were minimal.
Death penalty cost
It is costly in implementing death penalty compared to the cost of sentencing an individual for life. In addition, a number of guiltless people may be sentenced to death. Convicting an individual for the death penalty in some countries takes many years in the court events (Stacey, 82).Throughout this time, the course of action of the court is to attest the legitimacy of the using the provided evidence usually takes a longer period hence proving to be an expensive work out. Consequently, sustaining this application in various countries will prove to be a very tough task. There is higher cost involved during the time of the court conviction proceedings. Consequently, during the appeal procedure, the abolishment of the capital punishment will prove to be expensive compared to other alternatives.
According to Stacey Hynd’s article which concerns capital punishment in Kenya, the procedure involved in the management of military alliances to ensure success in its implementation is costly. The administration is required to sustain peace and order to the next level and this exercise is quite expensive especially in deterring individuals from committing crimes. (Stacey, 82). The act of revenge and justice to ensure punishment of the criminal is itself costly. Hence many historians are questioning the rule as they perceive it as a way of hiding criminals rather than providing solutions. The government is using the tax payers’ money to facilitate the capital pretrial and trial actions .The redirecting of resources from genuine crimes sites to facilitate death penalty is suicidal to any government which endeavors to grow. The Capitalism- Cyber culture article by Narveson, the transfer of financial flows from developing countries in form of capital flight will see the resources being channeled to central states to oversee the implementation of the capital punishment concept leaving the developing states seriously in need of the resources (Narveson, 49). Therefore, the recreation of this resource is costly for the developing nations who are endeavoring to maintain proper criminal justice system.
The costs concerning the death penalty can also increases when an individual who is convicted by the criminal offense receives a death sentence which in the long-run shortens his expected time before death. When an individual who has committed a crime is condemned, the degree of the law murdering outlay constantly enlarges. When individuals convicted with death row sentence and taken in the assessment proceedings, the indecision surrounding the capital punishment is likely to reduce the welfare therefore resulting into increases in costs.
Death Penalty Trends
Several countries have eradicated the death penalty and are now advocating for other alternatives as the best punishment for all the crimes. Capital punishment is perceived as an act of murder as it resulted into the killing of a murderer for the death of an individual. Capital punishment in the United States is of a growing concern for many people. The statistics provided by the panel studies reveals how people are starting to advocate for laws which are against capital punishment due to its disagreement. Chalfin publication with other panels in the the study of the detriment effect of capital punishment indicates that united states inmates sentenced to death in the 1972 was 7,773 inmates .Out of these, the statistics done highlighted the execution of around 15% while the 39% cases have been vacated due to successful appeals.Therefore,these statistics indicates the varying nature of the sentence cases where some states gives disproportional results for the number of executions and the number of inmates under the death penalty ( Aaron, Amelia& Steven, 6).
It is therefore evidenced that capital punishment is not and would not be the solution for the increasing number of crimes. Capital punishment as an answer of eradicating crimes gives unsubstantiated impression to the youth .Therefore; this approach to violence crime through capital punishment is a crime. Therefore legalizing the capital punishment is itself a crime as it can disrespect the human life dignity.
Death penalty and innocence
As indicated earlier, capital punishment when improperly imposed can lead to conviction of innocent persons. For example, inmates who are sentenced in the death penalty may turn out to be innocent especially when there are flaws in the criminal justice system hence resulting into the sentence vacation. The capital punishment can only be successful where the court system gives those responsible freedoms to manage the manner of giving evidence.  The death penalty concept can result into the wrongful murder and execution of men and women if not properly managed (Lawrence &Goodheart, 60).The concept can prove indecisive due to the likely change in the result pattern. In the panel article for instance, the weak connection that existed between the model and theory indicates the sensitivity in the specifications. This is due to the threats in the internal strength of the specification. This has resulted into the questioning of this concept because of its questionable margins. In view to the panel statistics, the capital punishment proved to be uninformative issue in the judicial process. This is due to its insufficient estimation and unconvincing justification when theoretically used. Establishing the correct relationship between the ex...