Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
You are here: HomeEssayPsychology
Pages:
7 pages/≈1925 words
Sources:
5 Sources
Level:
MLA
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 30.24
Topic:

Research and Analysis Assignment of an Issue or Conflict (Essay Sample)

Instructions:

the task was to write a psychology paper under the topic analysis of an issue or conflict. The client specifically instructed that ther should be direct intext quatations in each and every paragraph from the respective refernce sources

source..
Content:
Name
Professor’s name
Course
Date of submission
Analysis of an issue or conflict
Conflict is defined as a serious disagreement between two or more parties concerning a specific matter of concern among the sides involved. Fisher and Brown, (43 – 63) describes the conflict as a situation where individuals are overpowered by misunderstandings, mistrust, emotions and suspicions between themselves, they continue to argue that in such a time the logic and understanding of a person is conquered by strong emotions. Scenarios which are involved with conflict usually carries along two or more issues with equivalent levels of weight or significance amongst them. In such cases, it becomes very difficult to determine which sides of the parties involved one should be affiliated to. Cases of such nature usually are associated with a dilemma, whereby it is very challenging to justify any of the issues concerned. This essay will provide a detailed analysis of conflict situations which will be based on abortion and woman right's case study. According to most study materials, it's evident that almost every individual views abortion as a wrongful doing which is against the principles of human consciousness and righteousness.
Over the past years, a lot has been researched and studied about this conflicting issue of abortion and woman rights. Authors, researchers, pro-life and pro-choice activists have differed in their opinions on which case to justify and under which circumstances is such justification possible and right. It is argued that the debate over abortion against woman rights has been in existence for more than two centuries now. The debated heated up between 1960’s and 1970’s whereby groups advocating for women rights protested against other civil rights group advocating for the rights of unborn children who are referred to as fetus in biological terms. In 1800’s abortion was legally accepted in the US but after a series of laws were put in place, this practice began to take a new shape where it was viewed as an evil doing and was no longer legally accepted. The mid-19th century was the period which saw the abortion woman rights issue become such a huge national matter.
Firstly, abortion is viewed as a woman decision to make which is justifiable under various social, economic and health conditions. According to Petchesky, (414) he argues that “the right to choose an abortion is a necessity under present social conditions and that society must be transformed so that the sexual division of labor disappears and society collectively shares the responsibility of child rearing, is accepted”. His arguments raise concerns about how these social conditions can be justified since they are numerous and what about the rights of the unborn child over the rights of the mother. Arguments of such kind do not illustrate how the rights of the woman overshadow the rights to live off the fetus. His arguments are based on two perspectives one which is on a feminist view and another one on Marxist opinions. The feminists view he illustrates that “even after the transformation of society women must retain control over their own bodies rather than surrendering their rights to the collectively”. This shows that women should have the rights to practice abortion anytime without any immediate or future consequences. The feminists continue to justify abortion as argued by Petchesky, (419) “The increased rate of abortion among teenagers should not be viewed as an evil but rather as evidence that teenagers now have the choice of either marrying or not marrying. An unwanted pregnancy no longer prevents them from pursuing their educational and career goals. Abortion becomes more common, becomes a choice, and alternative, only when women have educational and career opportunities. Abortion is not a necessary evil; it is a necessary good”. (Arcon, 12-26).
On the other hand, organizations such as National Right to Life (NRL), progressed with opposition towards the right to women to abort without any consequences befalling them.
Secondly, the issue of when does life begin is another controversial matter in the conflict of woman rights against abortion. This argument is widespread and common between groups known as pro-life and pro-choice groups. Pro-life groups consist of activists and organizations who are against abortion practice whereas pro-choice comprise of advocates, protestors, and organizations who champion for women rights and encourages abortion practices i.e. National Right to Live (NRL), pro-life action league and pro-life America. According to the arguments of pro-life activists “Since life begins at conception, abortion is akin to murder as it is the act of taking human life. Abortion is in direct defiance of the commonly accepted idea of the sanctity of human life, therefore, No civilized society permits one human to intentionally harm or take the life of another human without punishment, and abortion is no different”. (Linda, 1).
Pro-life campaigners view that life begins at conception and under no circumstances should that life be taken. According to them if that happens the culprits should be punished for murder. However, on the side of pro-choice activists, they argue that "Nearly all abortions take place in the first...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!