Research and Describe Clashes of Civilizations (Essay Sample)

Student’s Name
Instructor’s Name
Course
Date
Clash of Civilizations
Introduction
In 1993, an American political scientist Samuel P. Huntington developed a theory called the Clash of Civilizations. The theory is based on an assumption that cultural and religious differences of people will be the fundamental source of controversy in the post-Cold War world. Huntington believed that while the period of philosophy had come to an end, the globe had now returned to a usual state characterized by cultural clash. In his works, he contends that the crucial revolve of conflict in the future will be along cultural lines. Huntington’s primary statement is that the most imperative disagreements among people groups are no longer based on ideological, political, or monetary grounds but are social. New forms of conflict will happen along the limits of various societies and examples of union will be found inside the cultural limits. Culture-shared trait allows the leadership and demand forcing part of the core states for both part state and center outer forces and foundations. Civic establishments are fully connected to religious association. Huntington states that the Islamic human advancement does not have a center state and is the variable that forbids these social guidelines to efficiently develop and modernize.
Clashes of Civilizations
Huntington predicts the large conflicts that will occur between civilizations. To start with, he suspects an alliance or collaboration amongst Islamic and Sinic societies to conflict with a real foe, the West. Issues that differentiate the West from the others are distinguished by Huntington as:
* The West’s power to keep up armed predominance through the restraint of rising military.
* The development of Western political principles, for instance, human rights and majority rule system.
* Restriction of non-Western migrants and exile into Western social orders.
* Non-Western countries see every one of the three angles as the Western nations endeavor to authorize and maintain their status as the social dominion.
* Islam and the West
Huntington goes into a brief historical clarification of the conflictual way of Islam and Christianity and afterward records five variables that have exacerbated struggle between the two religions in the late twentieth century. These variables are:
¯ The Muslim populace development has created extensive quantities of unemployed and disappointed youth that get to be volunteers to Islamic causes.
¯ The late resurgence of Islam has given Muslims a reaffirmation of the importance of Islam, contrasted with different religions.
¯ The West’s endeavor to universalize organizations and keep up military prevalence has produced extraordinary disdain inside the Muslim groups.
¯ Without the normal risk of socialism, the West and Islamic states now see each other different as adversaries.
¯ Increased correspondence and cooperation amongst Islam and the West has misrepresented the apparent contrasts between the two social orders.
* Asia, China, and America
Monetary advancement in Asia and China has brought about a hostile association with America. Huntington predicts that the mix of monetary achievement of the East Asian nations and the growing military force of China could bring about a noteworthy world clash. This contention would be increased much more by arrangements among Islamic and Sinic groups.
Implications of Huntington’s Work on International Security
Hunnington’s work has prompted to a Confucian-Islamic military association which is intended to secure its individuals from the weapons and arms advances expected to counteract the military of the West. The new form of arms competition is subsequently occurring amongst the Islamic-Confucian nations and the West. In an outdated weapons competition, each side built up its own specific arms to regulate or to achieve dominance over an opposite party. In this new kind of arms competition, solitary side is building up its weapons and an opposite region is struggling not to adjust but rather to restrict and slow down these weapons’ development, in the meantime, decreasing its own particular military capabilities.
Western nations are lessening their military power as well as Russia does. Non-Western countries, attest their right to equip weapons they consider necessary to guarantee their safety. Still, nuclear weapons, concoction weapons, and rockets are seen, mostly incorrectly, as the potential equalizer of prevalent Western traditional power.
Critiques of Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations
Huntington has fallen under the stern criticism of different scholarly journalists, who have analyzed his theory. For example, Paul Berman states that particular cultural limits don't exist in the present day. He contends there is no Islamic civilizations nor a Western development, and that the confirmation for a human advancement conflict is not persuading, particularly while considering connections, for example, that between the United States and Saudi Arabia. As per Berman, struggle emerges due to philosophical convictions people share (or don't share), paying little heed to social or religious character. Edward Said notes that Hunt...