Rights for Gays/Lesbians to Legally Marry (Essay Sample)

Date
Name
Professor’s Name
Course
Rights for Gays/Lesbians to Legally Marry
The debate on whether the constitution should be changed to allow gays/lesbians legal status, whereby the partners are protected while in the institution of marriage is a heated debated which has been ongoing in many years. There are those states whereby the rights of gays/lesbians to have legal marriages have been recognized, but in most of the states their right to legal marriage have not been recognized. This essay looks at the reasons why the American constitution should be amended to ensure that all states across the United States recognizes the rights of gays/lesbians to have legal marriages. The argument will focus on the impact that lack of legal marriages have on the gay and lesbian partners and the reasons why constitutional amendment can only be the best solution to resolve the issues of the rights for the gay community to a legal marriage.
One regular issue that faces gay and lesbian couples that are denied the right to have a legal marriage is their powerlessness to claim their accomplice's government managed savings (social security) after he or she has passed on. A number of human right groups are working to accomplish equivalent rights for lesbian, transgender individuals, bi-sexual and gay. They accept, "Any form of change to the Social Security framework must incorporate the issue of partners of gays and lesbians in its meaning of survivor Benefits". At present, there are no projects that give gay people survivor benefits like the ones that are accommodated to heteros who are hitched or separated. Gay/lesbian accomplices are not ready to claim benefits of their deceased partners, paying little heed to the way that all living up to expectations, subjects hetero or gay person pay into the Social Security framework for the beneficiary’s benefits. Unfortunately, this leaves numerous gay and lesbian couples with a shaky retirement. The most irritating truth is that despite the fact that gay people and hetero both pay the administration for survivor profits, even individuals who separated can even claim survivor advantages/benefits, though a deep rooted gay/lesbian marriage partnerscannot. This is glaring victimization of individuals who have diverse sexual orientation. This is a stand out case of how the legislature's refusal to perceive same-sex relational unions denies gay people rights that are evidently ensured by the state.
The ones who endure the best repercussions of such partialities are the offspring of gay and lesbian couples. Non-natural offspring of gays and lesbians cannot get survivor advantages if the expired accomplice did not lawfully receive them. Yet, how is this identified with whether gay people ought to be permitted to legal right to marry? Same-sex couples do have the benefit of embracing youngsters to have their own family. In any case, they are regularly dismissed due to their unmarried status. Regardless of the possibility that the administration does not wish to give some budgetary security to gay person couples, it ought not to rebuff the offspring of such connections. The administration straightforwardly oppresses the offspring of same-sex relational unions by not permitting them the same rights as youngsters who have hetero folks. Youngsters do not pick who their guardians will be in life; therefore, denying them right to social security related benefits are inhumane, just because of lack of legal status of their gay parents’ marriages. A number of human rights groups are fighting for the change in the social security framework, whereby "any change should likewise characterize survivor to incorporate non-organic offspring of gays and lesbians found in the changing family settings in the American society. This is completely fundamental on the grounds that it is preposterous that honest kids are being denied essential rights because of their guardians’ sexual orientation. In this case, death is an agonizing enough experience; no one ought not need to stress over their money related standings with the legislature in the wake of managing the departure of a friend or family member, without taking into consideration, a kid. Primarily, survivor Benefits must incorporate same-sex unions, not just on the grounds that it denies gay people rights that are frequently enjoyed by different sex couples, but because the offspring of these marriages are being victimized too.
Therefore, the only solution to the challenges facing the gay community in relation to legal marriage is only amending the American c...