Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
You are here: HomeEssayLaw
11 pages/≈3025 words
English (U.S.)
MS Word
Total cost:
$ 47.52

Doctrinal and social legal research (Essay Sample)


The assignment entailed research on two main research techniques used in law. The task required the student to utilize OSCOLA referencing in presenting the differences between Doctrinal and social legal approaches in legal research.

Social Legal and Doctrinal Research
Research is often a rigorous and through examination of materials aimed at informing and reinforcing available knowledge. Scholars note that the fundamental aspect is that any research involves the process of critical analysis of the processes and resilient features that define a subject. It is therefore observable that research employs analysis of the core factors that influence the development process in any field. However, research methodology each field adopts is either qualitative or quantitative. In essence, research is expected to illustrate the admissibility of any development and also to suggest weaknesses of an opinion forwarded by a scholar. Legal research in effect seeks to accomplish a number of issues. For instance, legal research could be used to identify the probable sources of law which are applicable in understanding legal problems and subsequently find solutions to the problems. Legal research is equally driven by procedural considerations the legal fraternity proposes. It is essential to note that the basic need for research is to streamline the procedures through analysis of the changes and adoptions that impact procure and practice. Based on this assertion, it is admissible that research in law often takes into consideration the social effects of legislations on the course of practice and also on the legal doctrines that influence ethics and continuity of law as a practice. In common law, there are a number of set technical rules often applied. On the contrary, these rules may vary in their application because of doubts and need for further analysis for confirmation. A classification of these rules bases on their acceptability as indisputable rules that are established on facts and impeccable sources. These rules constitute black letter law. It is important to note that black letter law is not entirely confined to a specific doctrinal area. In essence, this could be seen in contractual or trademarks law. Nonetheless, it is important to distinguish black letter law from legal jurisprudence. Based on Hart’s opinion on concept of law, law is a definite structure of rules classified into different categories. Theses categories are further divided to encompass the finer aspects of legal resolution. The need for developmental research is grounded on the opinions of outstanding legal scholars and figures. For instance, scholars opine that law is probable social change catalyst. As in every other field, research in law is carried in two distinct perspectives. These are doctrinal and social regal research perspectives.
Social Legal Research Methodology
It is a fact that the law is a fundamental and integral part of the social world. Social aspects of living determine major issues in law given the fact that each legislation or legal position has direct or indirect impact on the prevailing social set ups. Based o the argument that law influences social life, it is worth noting that law is social institution and that any decisions made in law should emphasize on consistency in consideration of the social aspects and that the society should be the primary source of law. Socio-legal research, often referred to as non doctrinal research framework employs the analysis of legal issues based on different disciplines. The research approach draws empirical data from these fields. In this approach, the researcher can choose a qualitative or quantitative analysis of a problem, policy issue or need for a reform in a certain law. In a nutshell, non doctrinal research methodology is embraces all disciplines that are concerned with aspects of law such as legal processes and the effects of legislations and institutions. Given the fact that socio-legal research encompasses different disciplines and theoretical perspectives, it is considered diverse. This is one factor that non doctrinal research method has in contrast with doctrinal research methodology.
It is important to note that criticism to a specific research method stems from the demerits and most importantly, the challenges a researcher faces in the event that he or she adopts the approach in a research. For instance, socio-legal research has a number of benefits. To begin with, the research procedure enables the law students and academics as well as practitioners to experience the law. It is observable that it is impossible to experience the law in action if the researcher adopted a doctrinal analysis. Secondly, non doctrinal research methodology does not lay emphasis on the rule of law but provides systematic references to the contexts of the prevailing problem. The resilient feature of socio legal research is that it draws the society to the rule of law and consequently makes law an integral part of processes that lead to societal growth. As noted earlier, socio-legal research embraces a host of disciplines which contribute to the ability to bridge the divide that exists between law and other disciplines. This is significant because it creates relevance in law and the relativity. In addition to this, socio-legal research presents law in its appropriate way to the public. Whereas these merits are apparent, anti socio-legal research proponents base their argument on the demerits of adopting such an approach. Notably, the process of socio-legal research contributes not only to its merits but also its demerits. In non doctrinal method, the researcher samples data in a qualitative manner. As a result, the interpretation of the data determines the outcome. In most cases, it is argued that the possibility of arriving at different assertions in a similar survey. This is the most commonly held argument against the approach. This is in the end detrimental to the fraternity due to the fact that law practitioners’ neutrality is questioned. The other notable accusation held against socio-legal research is that the present day lawyer believes this methodology is unsuitable for practicing lawyers given the fact that this category of lawyers deal with specific cases. This negates the analysis of broader global and societal issues even if they are concerned with law. This school of thought holds that the fundamental aspect of law is to seek definite answers as opposed to general views. Hyman posits that socio-legal research methods give results in generalities which are inappropriate in practical law. In addition to these, non doctrinal research is believed to be hard to carry out for most scholars. This is because some researchers are not adequately informed of the details of the method. Research timeline is another issue that is often considered in the debate on the appropriateness of non doctrinal research regime. In this regime, the researcher has to locate the issues and subsequently research on the issues. The time needed for such the activities compounds the issues cited for the inadequacy of socio-leg...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!