Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Visual & Performing Arts
Type:
Movie Review
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 14.4
Topic:

Film Study: 12 Angry Men (Movie Review Sample)

Instructions:

12 angry men film review that focuses on how a jury conducts itself regarding a case at hand. The film has eight jurors, but the focus is on two jurors, juror#3 and juror#8, who have contrasting character traits. The film review examines how these two jurors affect the dynamics of the group and the jury's final decision.

source..
Content:


12 Angry Men (Film Study)
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Name and Number
Instructor’s Name
Date
Abstract
12 Angry Men is a film originally made in 1957 and remade in 1997. This essay looks at the remakes because it is better than the first. Twelve jurors are tasked with deciding whether an accused person is guilty or innocent. The process of decision-making in a group is not easy because of the differing points of view. In this case, the loudest person was Juror #3, and the reasonable person was Juror #8. These are the people who led the decision-making process because of their traits. Juror #3 wanted to impose his ideas on the rest of the Jurors, and Juror #8 helped the Jurors use the facts provided to make the right decision. Therefore, they both control and lead the group in two different ways, Juror #3 imposed authoritative leadership, and Juror #8 imposed participative leadership.
12 Angry Men (Film Study)
12 Angry Men in 1997 is a remake of a classic, and the second time, the film was made even better. There are 12 main characters, including the Jurors, whereby the Foreman is the leader, which is evident from how he likes being in charge. The characters have different character traits that are skillfully combined to bring out the exciting drama of this film. Although each Juror contributes differently, the focus will be on George C Scott (Juror #3) and Jack Lemmon (Juror #8). Juror #3 is strict, strong, does not joke around, and forces his opinion on other jurors. In other words, this juror is full of himself. Juror #8 is quiet most of the time, considers other jurors' opinions, offers a

...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

  • America is Racist and Homophobic: Del Toro's Allegoric View in The Shape of Water
    Description: The Shape of Water (2017), directed by Guillermo Del Toro, is a gripping cross-border allegory film that depicts the social difficulties of 1960s America. The plot revolves around the lives of five characters: Elisa (Sally Hawkins), Strickland (Michael Shannon), the Amphibian Man (Doug Jones), Zelda (Octavia...
    2 pages/≈550 words| 5 Sources | APA | Visual & Performing Arts | Movie Review |
  • Journalism in the Community: Spotlight
    Description: Spotlight is an American drama film written by Josh Singer and directed by Tom McCarthy. It was released on 3rd September 2015, in Venice. The film is borrowed from The Boston Globe's "Spotlight" team, one of the oldest newspapers in investigative journalism in the United States that investigate public...
    4 pages/≈1100 words| 3 Sources | APA | Visual & Performing Arts | Movie Review |
  • The Avengers and the Concept of Interpersonal Communication
    Description: The movie The Avengers is a movie based on the tragic events that occur in Newyork city after Loki gains access to the unlimited power of the Tesseract, which is disguised as a blue cube. In the bid to curb his ambitious acts, the director of Shield, Nick Fury, seeks to initiate a superhero program directed...
    4 pages/≈1100 words| 3 Sources | APA | Visual & Performing Arts | Movie Review |
Need a Custom Essay Written?
First time 15% Discount!