3 pages/≈825 words
Part II: “Get Tough”: The Conservative Attack on Crime..... Chapter 7: Lock ‘Em U (PowerPoint Presentation Sample)
IWAS TO Read chapter 7 (pages 161-190) then answer the prompt. I will provide the book pdf inside the "upload files".," THE CHAPTER highlights strategies for law enforcement agencies to reduce crime on the streets. CONSERVATIVES ON THE OTHER HAND HAD ARGUED THAT IMPRISONING CRIMINALS IS A SUCCESSFUL METHOD OF LOWERING CRIME, WHEREAS LIBERALS HAVE SUGGESTED THAT THE TECHNIQUE HAS HAD MANY ADVERSE EFFECTS. I was to highlight the issues addressed in the chapter. source..
Student’s Name Professor’s Name Course Date Part II: “Get Tough”: The Conservative Attack on Crime..... Chapter 7: Lock ‘Em Up Chapter 7, “Lock 'em up," highlights strategies for law enforcement agencies to reduce crime on the streets. Conservatives have argued that imprisoning criminals is a successful method of lowering crime, whereas liberals have suggested that the technique has had many adverse effects. These negative implications include increasing budgetary expenditure, diversion of funds that could sponsor viable projects, aggregation of racial disparities, and promotion of prison overcrowding. However, liberals argue that locking these criminals has social benefits, such as peace and societal stability, which supersede economic costs. Question 1: The Central Tenets and Assumptions Putting criminals behind bars and retaining them in those facilities is a critical conservative crime reduction tactic. Approaches for locking them up encompass preventive detection, incapacitation, and mandatory sentencing. These mechanisms aim to restrain the powers of law enforcement, given that judgments are overly indulgent and politics in the United States fight against imprisoning suspects. Preventive detention generates the legal issue of whether the Eighth Amendment forbids confinement for the intent of deterring crime, as well as the evidence-based issue of whether preventive detention will minimize heinous offenses. Conservatives contend that individuals out on bail perpetrate many crimes. Incapacitation entails arresting convicts without attempting to discourage or rehabilitate their aims to reduce crime by eliminating them from the streets. The criminal justice system employs gross incapacitation to imprison only a small number of high-risk perpetrators or hardened criminals. Gross incapacitation entails imprisoning numerous criminals, irrespective of their previous convictions and records. By 1994, all states had some obligatory penalty that usually applied to particular transgressions. The most common conventional crime reduction technique entails mandated minimum jail terms and detention for specific offenses. The Four Propositions Detention without charge will not lessen heinous offenses. Conservatives think that those out on bail engage in more crimes. Incapacitation, either gross or selective, is not a practical approach to lowering major criminal offenses (Walker 175). The replacement effect persists because while some criminals are in prison, others take their place. Moreover, mandatory sentencing is ineffective at lowering severe crime in each manifestation. No connection has been proven to exist between confinement rates and crime levels. Finally, in some ways, sexual offender containment and rehabilitation are hampered by legislation that requires registration, reporting, and location restrictions. These regulations do not work to stop recurrent sex offenses. Question 2: Critical Reaction Lock 'em up tactics seem like a straightforward and efficient approach to lowering crime from a conventional perspective as it clears serial lawbreakers from society, making them not continue to prey on their potential targets. Regrettably, it is not relatively easy to eliminate criminal cases entirely by using this approach in the reality of the criminal justice system (Tiratelli et al. 1212). First, it is difficult to pinpoint the diminutive pack of high-rate criminals, given their anonymous nature. Besides, rules that grossly incapacitate people cause manifold legal issues for the legal system resulting in courtroom participants frequently seeking tricks to get around harsh corrective legislation. Moreover, there is insufficient proof that mass incarceration results in a claimed decrease in criminality. Even if criminality does decrease, it is debatable if the massive monetary societal cost makes it worthwhile. The above-stated points prove that crime is a complex issue, and the law enforcement system cannot tackle it using a single approach to arrests. An arrest is a reactive approach that does not solve the cause of the problem. Crime emanates from various sources, and the act itself is just a exhibition. For instance, some social issues may cause some groups to engage in crime without hesitating. Unemployment or societal pressure to fulfill certain obligations might force someone to engage in criminal behavior despite knowing the consequences. A push to attain some basics may be too much because people see crime as the only survival option. For example, slum areas where poverty rates are high record high crime rates because of lack of opportuniti...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now: