Thomas Kuhn Theory on the Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Research Paper Sample)

THOMAS KUHN’S THEORY ON THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS ANALYSIS
Name
Institution
Instructor, Institution
Date of Submission
Introduction
For over half a century ago, a book by Thomas Kuhn has altered the way we view philosophy behind science and introducing the much-abused phrase ‘paradigm shift.’ The book surveys the psychology of belief that accepts new ideas and innovations in science. Kuhn showed that the history of science is one of radical shifts of vision in which a crowd of non-rational and non-empirical factors co-operate. In this paper however, we are going to analyze the theory on the structure of scientific revolutions based on the paradigm and how the theory remains controversial until now.
Scientific revolutions
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions exposes a wide disseminated and simple myth on how science evolve i.e. doing science is like following a recipe—something similar to the “scientific method” one learns about in school. Kuhn argues that the scientific history is still present to students linearly. Kuhn recommended this revisionist “Whig history” role to give scientists an essential logic of background for their own effort, though it paints an oversimplified image of scientific tactic that is unpredictable with the very messy and a compound assortment of issues that serve to form scientific agreement.
Kuhn's idea of the relationship between finding and acknowledgement delineate the move from established to relativistic flow in Physics. He affirms that Einstein's hypothesis could be acknowledged with the affirmation that Newton's hypothesis was incorrect. On this view, the progress of scientific revolution based on Kuhn’s paradigm shift pictures series of new and exclusive fields of knowledge. He used the word “paradigm” (acquisition of facts, theories, methods, and assumptions about reality that allows researchers to isolate data, elaborate theories, and solve problems) to illustrate this theoretical matrix.
Before Kuhn, we had what added up to the Whig understanding of logical history; where in the past rationalists had occupied with a long walk, if not towards "truth", then at any rate towards better and energetic about the regular world. Kuhn's version differed from the Whig’s (steady, cumulative progress) in that", he saw discount annuities. The revolutionary phases transform from Newtonian mechanics to quantum physics forms of scientific revolution, which corresponds to theoretical breakthroughs. This lays the foundation for the next phase of business as usual. The reality that his version seems unremarkable now is, in a way, the greatest determinant of his achievement. In 1962, almost everything about it went controversial since it challenged powerful and entrenched philosophical assumptions about how science did and should work. What made it more badly for philosophers of science was that Thomas Kuhn was not even a philosopher: he was a physicist.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this outlook as far as Kuhn Structure of scientific revolution takes into account; the results of science cannot measure another model. The idea of truth and the result suggests that the paradigm community or leader now reigns as "élite judge" of what to consider worthy of scientific truth status. In my view, the "science as an agreement view" is so far from assuring the checks and balances of personal scientific sovereignty that it actua...