The Origin and Development of Charter School Initiative (Research Paper Sample)
This paper invites you to pick a movement or any educational variable, and seek out its historical origins, explain its evolution, and intellectually grapple with the social and political drivers that moved it from an idea to a policy and/or movement.source..
The charter school movement has faced many controversies. Since their debut in the United States, charter school initiative has aided in developing and further elevating the education quality and access for many students. However, these schools of choice are perceived as a threat to the autonomy of the education sector and the stakeholders involved. Charter schools are publicly funded schools which are granted more autonomy over curriculum choices, compared to traditional public k-12 schools (Gawlik 784). Introduced in 1992, the City Academy Charter School in St. Paul Minnesota, became the first of its kind to operate in the United States and admitted 35 inner-city high school dropouts (Murphy et al. 5).The charter movement was then created to push for the adoption of a more efficient education program, its effort supported by the claimed success of the new charter school initiative. Moreover, the traditional k-12 schools educational establishment was seen to be in crisis and plagued with unresponsive bureaucracy. The aim was to make the schools innovative and diminish the direct control by the local school board; consequently, making them more responsive to the needs of the clients. The movement has spread today, with more than 6,800 charted public schools registered in the 2015-2016 school year, and an estimated 2.9 million students enrolled in them (Murphy et al. 5).
The debate over charter schools has been influenced by subjective ideologies, and the effect the reforms have had on the students or the progress of the education sector. Notably, some assessments tend to give biased reviews that rarely have an impact on reducing of the gap in education knowledge. This paper seeks to clarify the position of charter schools in society by tracking their progress objectively through the last two decades to their current state. Factors that contributed to the development and progress will be addressed, in conjunction with significant policies and key figures that influenced the growth of charter schools in the United States of America. Contributions made by charter schools in the American education will also be assessed, and consequently take a stand on the debate regarding the necessity and contribution of charter schools in the country.
The Origin and Development of Charter School Initiative
Charter school initiatives arose from the educational reforms of the1980s and 1990s through the mandate of the states to improve instruction, and restructure the schools to serve fundamental roles in society (Murphy et al. 5). A debate on the low education quality being offered in the capitalist-democratic state served as a significant contributor to the emergence of charter schools. The new notion of charter schools and the high expectations people had on the new education program exposed the widespread problems in American public schools, both actual and fabricated claims, with the charter school initiative generated to address these deficiencies. Earlier initiatives with almost similar patterns had however failed to take root, allowing the reformists to build on them and device a new model (Murphy et al. 8).
Three earlier models, in particular, contributed to the development of the charter schools as an attempt to alter the bureaucratic delivery of education in America. The first of these is the innovative schools model created through the input and collaboration of the teacher, parents and the community, allowing the teacher to implement adaptive learning depending on unique demographic educational needs. The second empowerment model was the magnet school, which emerged in the mid-1970s. The model targeted school districts providing significant additional funds to the specified schools, serving as incentives to start specialized instructional methods or themes and attract parents and students (Orfield 3). Unlike in the innovative school model, initiatives in magnet schools were solely conducted by the school district administrators meaning very little input if any was received from the parents or the community (Perez 48). The third model designed by school districts was the alternative schools, tailored to serve targeted populations that were underrepresented within their zoned schools.
Literature and response on the three previous models provided the basics for the creation of charter schools, with other key elements added to make it better than the other forms of nontraditional education. Ray Budde is credited with coining the term charter, which was later introduced into the American vernacular in the late 1980s by Al Shanker. At the time, he was the head of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT). Through education by Charter, Ray Budde defined a model of improving instruction in schools through the restructuring of school districts and by changing the school organization. The prototype described by Ray Budde consisted of a written charter that addressed concerns between the school districts and the teachers with the aim of establishing innovative instructional programs. The educational contracts provided autonomy to the teachers, giving them the authority to explore and develop new ways of teaching and educating the children through the aid of public funds and minimal state intervention (Kretchmar 750). The instructional programs emerging from these contracts were expected to serve as the basis for restructuring the school districts.
Ray Budde's education by charter proposal was built on four logic dynamics. One aspect was the complete redefinition of the roles of the teachers and administrators in schools, giving them more responsibilities in their duties. The operations of the school board changed in this new model. The third aspect of it was the provision of continuing curriculum renewal and improvements to cater for new trends and needs of the students, to ensure all emergent details are contained in the teaching package and production of an all-rounded student (Murphy et al. 7). Additionally, the proposed education pattern called for cooperation amongst all parties involved in the education sector to identify the knowledge base of the new school curriculum. Under this system, teachers were the central players, with the principal, curriculum director, or a superintendent being an active participant of the charter team provided they regularly taught on their respective fields (Huerta 245). The parents and the community then joined the teachers to form a discussion group at the initial phase of educational charter development. However, unlike the case today, the parents and community served as mere advisors to the system, without having any tangible decision making power in the Budde charter school model.
Budde's idea, in existence since 1975, was introduced to the world by Albert Shanker in Marc...
- How Poverty Affect Children in their Early Childhood EducationDescription: Poverty affects the likelihoods of children's educational achievement and concurrently educational achievement is one of the instruments of evading debt...4 pages/≈1100 words| MLA | Education | Research Paper |
- Accessibility of Technology in EducationDescription: Technology is one of the fastest evolving human discoveries that have transformed almost every aspect of life - Research Paper...2 pages/≈550 words| MLA | Education | Research Paper |
- MSC PROJECT MANAGEMENT (CONSTRUCTION)Description: MSC PROJECT MANAGEMENT (CONSTRUCTION) Education Research Paper...3 pages/≈825 words| MLA | Education | Research Paper |