The Effectscauses Of Cyber-Attack In Relation With The Current Technological Emergences (Research Paper Sample)

Name:
Instructor:
Course:
Date due:
Technology
How has technology like drone and cyberwar transformed conflict? Do power asymmetries, particularly the lack of reciprocity, mean that JWT is not applicable to new technologies? Why or why not?
From autonomous robotic weapons to cyber-attacks that are state-sponsored, the war of the 21st was quite disembodied. Machines are used to fight wars in the ether. However, the war ethics are stuck in the age of pre-digital.
Most people term warfare to being similar to a physical phenomenon; war is a destructive violence outbreak occurring in the physical world. In that, in wars, people collapse, bullets fly, tanks roll, and bombs explode. Irrespective of the great changes in the warfare technology, it remains as a human bodies contest. However, as portrayed by the drone, used in wars, this is not the case anymore, at least for the battle’s one side.
Technological asymmetry has been a major warfare feature. Nevertheless, no country has managed through the process war prosecution without engaging its citizens to physical risks. Often people might wonder what may be the capacity of launching casualty-free wars affect the barriers of politics standing between conflict and peace. In the contemporary democracies, a politician is needed to elaborate, at regular intervals, why young citizens blood in a nation is required in a military action. In this case, wars involving machines may not experience high skepticism levels in the public sphere.
People lack d knowledge of what moral constraints ought to apply to such warfare types. The prominent, ancient Just War Theory doctrine suggests that the destructive actions of war should only be unleashed when it is necessary. On this note, war should be persuaded only against the combatants and as a last resort but not against the civilians.
Conversely, information warfare (battles accomplished through the use of information technologies) disagrees with various concepts such as “civilian” as well as “necessity” in ways challenging such ethical structures. Attacks on other country’s information infrastructure, for example, counts as war act. This leaves the question of what if this minimized the future bloodshed risk, should people consider it being the final resort? The application of robots makes these matter even more complicated. This is because no clear guidelines explain what should be done in case a military robot is responsible for a civilian’s death
Often, the information warfare has been debated. In the philosophical analysis, information warfare should be defined wherein concrete forms and later confirm for uniformity between such forms. Hacker attacks or cyber-crimes is a good example of this and which is classified under information warfare. Pursuing this further, application of drones as well is an instance of these whereby a drone is a semi-autonomous machine. Therefore, information warfare explains on the use of technologies of information communication within military strategies that a state endorses. In addition to this, the Pentagon, for instance, defines it as information operations or cyber attacks and cyber warfare.
Pursuing this further, the Estonia attack is particular an example relating to this. For instance, one could point to the SWORDS robots being utilized in Iraq a few years before the Estonia attack or the predator drones application. However, one must understand that information warfare is comprised of more than just technologies related to information communication applied via the web; such technologies may be used in other different domains as well as in other different means.
In addition to this,Although pre-internet information technologies and information warfare are information technologies, information is regarded as a warfare’s significant segment; people always want to communicate. Additionally, people want to destroy the information structures and communication capacities of their enemies. Adding to this, new types of technologies relating to information communication are more revolutionary in terms their warfare effects than previous technologies such as walkie-talkies, radios, telegraphs and telephones.
The new types of technologies relating to information communication have restructured the reality that people perceive themselves to be living in, and people’s ways of thinking regarding the state or warfare concepts. People define the state as a political unit exercising power over a precise physical territory. But, by considering that a state is attempting as well to dominate certain cyberspace parts, this definition becomes complicated since cyberspace lacks a defined physical region. These concepts are being shuffled around by the information revolution in a philosophical perspective as well as an ethical viewpoint.
There are various ways that the political decisions for deploying or endorsing such machines are facilitated by these technologies nature. Firstly, they are cheaper than ancient weapons. Nevertheless, they bypass the political officials need of confronting public and media opinion regarding sending young soldiers to wars risking their lives. Such machines promote military operations contemplation that was considered quite risky to be undertaken by humans. From the military and political perspective, these weapons have more advantages than the disadvantages.
Some problems arise from using the machines; for example, when robots are used to fight a war in another nation, that nation’s is likely to slow regarding gaining of trust hence making persuasion or occupation quite hard. This is evident in Afghanistan or Iraq, where people become slower in developing empathy for the forces of America since they refer to them as people sending machines for fighting wars.
The SQR-A1 is a new type of robotic weapon, and that varies greatly from the previous information warfare weapons. In that, such machines are not always operated by humans. It has the ability of autonomously deciding whether to fire on a particular target without waiting for the remote operator’s signal. Previously, teleoperation was used to control drones. Otherwise, they lacked the ability to fire. In this case, the likelihood of the machine harming human beings was quite low. The existence of weapons like SGR-A1 brings about various questions that people should confront. On one side, saving human lives is wonderful, but the responsibility issues, the problem of the individual responsible for these actions caused by these machines is not adequately addressed.
Information revolution conveys unique ways that the technologies of information communication have changed people’s lives. Twitter and Facebook, for instance, have just introduced a space that is not physical that people exist in and which is becoming as significant as physical or online space; non-physical domain’s events often influence the physical world events. Information warfare shows the increasing significance of such a non-physical domain. On the same not...