Collapse of the Society: A Choice of Failure or Success (Term Paper Sample)

Collapse of the Society: A choice of failure or success
Name
Institution
Collapse of the Society: A choice of failure or success
The human society is characterized by the change that is endeavoured by humans for the betterment of their lives. The results of these efforts are dedicated towards a better future society that will probably exhibit variant results, with some becoming viable while other just failing. The history of humanity has recorded evolution in terms of technology and the human mind, with the enormous success enjoyed, although failure looms in the future of these advancements.
The cycle of self-destruction has been understood in the form of a societal model that separates small communities bigger communities set ups using innovation and technology (Diamond, 2005). The resultant bigger society then undergoes growth leading the consumption of both human and natural resources at considerably higher rates. With such use and utility of resources, the result is increased productivity. The increment in productivity will then mean that the society is experiencing a period within which it enjoys the higher returns and success.
Failure, however, becomes inevitable, as the society desires more growth, which in turn results in continued and ever-increasing consumption of resources. If the society, therefore, grows to a point where it cannot sustain itself under the means available, the community is forced to stretch beyond its means, thereby inviting loopholes for subsequent collapse. The simplest societies in history to the most complex have revealed a desire to obtain resources necessary for sustenance and growth, and brutality marked by wars and desperation has been a primary means of resource acquisition.
Although some resources could be gained through such dishonest and illegal means, the result will always be a collapse upon itself. For instance, in the course of the World War I and II, some states attained power and wealth, but the resultant impacts of the wars saw the collapse of other great nations at the time, with further destruction of natural and human resources recorded. However, in the present, there has been a slight shift in the manner in which societies are experiencing collapse. Modernity makes every society vulnerable to collapse since both the rural and the urban centres are subject to downfall. In both the urban centres and rural, the cause of failure is the mounting pressure that is exerted on resources. This paper is an extensive study of the collapse of such societies, with sufficient illustrations drawn from extremist nations from Collapse by Diamond (2005).
According to Diamond (2005), collapse is a notion that entails the drastic reduction in the size of human population or the reduction of human complexity in social, economic or political spheres. Such reduction must necessarily persist for a comparatively long period and over a wide geographical area. Collapse as a notion further involves the decline of mild but yet extreme measure, with the determination of the drastic nature of the decline becoming arbitrary in measurement. Therefore, collapse can take many forms, ranging from conquering of a society by a neighbouring one, replacement of a leader in a government by another through an infamous coup or the decline of a society because of the rise against it by another (Diamond, 2005).
The Bitterroot Valley in which the Huls Farm is established and the Greenland Norse where the Gardar Farm was found are such societies that have faced threats of collapse. Although the farms in their prime ages were well established, rendering thoughts of collapse vague. However, with sets of shared opportunities came their threats. The farms, for instance, were strategically located to attract tourists and efficient technology from a distance. Their major threats included their establish...