The Key Issues of the Improvement of Export Promotion Policy at the Macro and Micro levels (Term Paper Sample)

Paper title: The key issues of the improvement of export promotion policy at the macro- and micro levels
Abstract: Exporting is an important factor of economic growth, and therefore export promotion is a critical consideration for economic development of each country. As a public policy component government-sponsored programs must be developed to promote export activities. Promoting export activity; particularly by traditional exports and new export products, is essential for progress in this area. This paper establishes the basic functions and the key strategies of such export support systems. It also represents questions which are the main essential issues in the sphere of export promotion. In many countries the government is the principal provider of export assistance to the business community. Anyway, the government alone does not have all the resources, the staff, the expertise, or the communication channels needed to wage such a broad-based promotional campaign and for this reason the government develops broader and deeper partnerships with the private sector.
Keywords: Export promotion, government-sponsored programs, business sector, traditional exports and new export products, export trial and evaluation stages, resource-driven, investment-driven and innovation-driven stages
Author: Karen Grigoryan
Author Affiliations: PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Macroeconomics, Armenian State University of Economics, Yerevan, Armenia,
Erasmus Mundus Post doctorate fellow in the Department of Management and Business Development, University of Ruse, Ruse, Bulgaria
The key issues of the improvement of export promotion policy at the macro- and micro levels
Introduction: The role of exporting
As it is known from microeconomics, international economics and marketing, exporting is one of many market expansion activities of the firm. As such, exporting is similar to looking for new customers in the next town, the next regions; it differs in that national borders are crossed, and international accounts and currencies are involved. Yet, these differences make exports special from a policy perspective.
And based on macroeconomics, exports are special because they can affect exchange rate, fiscal and monetary policies of governments, shape public perception of competitiveness and determine the level of imports a country can afford.
It should be mentioned also that on the level of the firm, exports offer the opportunity for economies of scale. By broadening its market reach and serving customers abroad, a firm can produce more and do so more efficiently, which is particularly important if domestic sales are below break-even levels. As a result, the firm may achieve lower costs and higher profits both at home and abroad. Through exporting the firm benefits from market diversification, taking advantage of different growth rates in different markets, and gaining stability by not being overly dependent on any particular market. Exporting also lets the firm learn from the competition, makes it sensitive to different demand structures and cultural dimensions, and proves its ability to survive in a less familiar environment in spite of higher transaction costs. All these lessons can make the firm a stronger competitor at home.
Finally, since exporting is only one possible international marketing strategy it may well lead to the employment of additional strategies such as direct foreign investment, joint ventures, franchising or licensing - all of which contribute to the growth and economic strength of the firm, and, on an aggregate level, to the economic growth of a country.
State and private export promotion
In general, and particularly under contemporary globalization processes, export of goods and services, and economic development, increasingly are becoming positively correlated and interdependent. Exports affect and are affected by long-term economic growth through various channels such as production and demand linkages, learning effects and improvement of human resources, adoption of superior technology embodied in foreign-produced capital goods, and the general easing of the foreign exchange constraint associated with the expansion of the export sector (Delano Villanueva, 1993, Auboin, 2004). Thus, because of the important role of exports, relevant promotion policy should be drawn for development of this sector.
Of course, the export strategy is only one of the many factors contributing to a country's growth, though there is a strong association between the two (Krueger 1983). In addition, the way countries organize for export promotion is expected to differ according to the cultural, legal, and political environments as well as the stage of economic development in individual countries (Seringhaus and Rosson 1990).
It should be indicated some nuance between promotion of traditional exports and new export products. The first one can lead only to export growth, whereas the last one concerns diversification (both-geographic and product diversifications), which is very important for export development.
Generally, export promotion is the most important part of the commercial policy of many countries. Export promotion means carrying out an active trade policy. In the last decades, it concerned, first of all, developing countries and countries in transition. The policy of export promotion, as a rule, is only a phase of a commercial policy under certain social, economic and political conditions.
Today's export promotion programs often provide comprehensive and sophisticated services to the business community. To this regard, the following questions are the main essential issues:
1. Which sector is responsible for export promotion - the public sector, private sector, or joint efforts?
2. What should include a relevant export promotion policy portfolio?
3. Who should provide what activities? Who Is Responsible for Export Promotion?
It is remarkable that the issue of the role of government-sponsored programs has generated opposing perspectives from two branches of economic schools. One views government-sponsored export promotion as a subsidy that distorts free trade. This distortion is assumed to misallocate resources and result in lower global economic welfare (Bhagwati 1990, Ramaswami, and Srinivasan 1969).
The other economic school considers government participation more favorably, as an attempt to improve market information. No matter which perspective one adopts, there is no denying that the potential economic gains from exporting have led governments in both developed and developing countries to initiate trade policies designed to increase export competitiveness. Whether formally recognized or not, government and exporters usually are involved in a "public- private partnership," in which the private sector provides the initiative and the public sector provides the necessary controls and support.
In general, competitiveness is usually related to macroeconomic issues (such as changes in exchange rates or wages) or microeconomic issues (such as an absence of entrepreneurship and excessive bureaucratic regulations on business). Actually, many factors, including initial conditions, history, natural resources, country size, geography and competitiveness strategy, influence business competitiveness in developing countries.
The role of the business sector is different. Successful experiences in many countries suggest that, in the management of a developing country’s competitiveness strategy, business, particularly business associations and leading firms, can make at least four important contributions. It can:
Help weaker firms to help themselves by establishing industry-specific training centers, carrying out productivity benchmarking exercises and quality awareness projects, fostering subcontracting relations and providing advice on effective marketing strategies.
Help government to plug information gaps by undertaking surveys of business confidence, highlighting export market barriers, participating in WTO negotiations and trade promotion missions, and engaging in regular economic policy dialogues with government.
Increase government capabilities by seconding specialist managers in finance, marketing and general management on short-term programs to key government departments and investment promotion missions.
Participate in building infrastructure and other strategic national projects by providing private finance as well as a package of marketing and managerial expertise.
Surely, the economic and particularly industrial growth causing by export growth, is issue of observation at macroeconomic level but can be studied only at microeconomic level (Kopeva, Shterev and Blagoev 2010). This is one more prove of necessity of public and private partnership and cooperation not only in conducting efficient export promotion policy but also in the formulation of reasonable export promotion strategy and policy.
Export promotion targeting
It should be noticed that one of the major criticisms of government export promotion schemes in many countries is that they tend to be poorly targeted. Awareness levels about export schemes among managers of companies at exporting or pre-exporting stages of internationalization are often quite low, and the perceived usefulness of schemes may decline as companies internationalize and their needs become more specific. One solution may be to develop a better understanding of the needs of managers who make export market development decisions, and to target segments of managers (rather than companies) who share similar strengths and weaknesses.
There is a growing body of literature concerned with identifying managerial characteristics that appear to be related to increased levels of company internationalization and/or performance (Dichtl, Koeglmayr and Mueller 1990; Louter, Ouwerkerk an...