Construction Senior Management Questions (Term Paper Sample)

Construction senior management questions
Name
Course
Instructor’s name
Date
2.1 How to check that clients are made aware of the relevant health and safety regulations and legal framework
Every organization has its own health and safety concerns to their clients. The precautions taken are in the clients’ best interest. Therefore, checking their awareness should be done through monitoring their movements, interaction and response to people and facilities that they interact with. Clients will be calm or reckless when they are not aware of any risks associated with their interaction. However, knowledgeable clients will be cautious and responsible in their movement and interaction.[M. J Kallen, S. P Kuniewski and Jan M. van Noortwijk, Risk And Decision Analysis In Maintenance Optimization And Flood Management (IOS Press 2009).]
On the other hand checks can be stage planned to see how clients respond to given threats. This measure enables the organization to improve areas of weaknesses that can be present. In most cases people panic when they are expected to make rushed decisions. It is the decision made during such times that will determine the safety of a client if the event takes place in real time. Training should be emphasized at all times where clients will get to know the changes made and make sure that they understand the environment they occupy.
2.2 How to collaborate with interested parties to ensure the compliance of designs
Interested parties in this case are the supervisor, designers, specialist, clients, advisors, construction managers, contractors and specialist contractors. All these parties want to develop a successful design that will cater for all their intended needs. It is vital that every stakeholder to respect each other’s position because they are all equally relevant. Their collaboration will be ensured through planning where everyone will be given a particular task to be completed within a given period. The plan will have different phases that will be used to monitor the progress made.[Akira Ishikawa and Atsushi Tsujimoto, Risk And Crisis Management (World Scientific 2009).]
After considering that they will not be working under the same environment, they will be weekly meetings or any other duration that the supervisor will use to analyze progress. At this stage different stakeholders will be briefed, offered amendment and other recommendations. It will be only after the accomplishment of the first phase that they will be allowed to advance to the next stage. Their collaboration will be crucial in making the project a success and thereafter proper time management.[J. W Cherrie and others, Monitoring For Health Hazards At Work (Wiley-Blackwell 2010).]
2.3 How to Identifying operations that may arise to hazards
There are many stakeholders that understand their environment and all the hazards relating to the same. The experts will deliver a list of all operations that their health concerns and the operations that their exercises comprise. After collecting the information, it will be followed by scrutiny of all operation and counter operation. However, it is easy to simulate the day to day events that the design is likely to have to have a proper understanding and ensure there are no loopholes. This will be a feasibility study that the clients, users and stakeholders will also get a chance to offer recommendations.
All the operations in the design will need to state the users and the processes involved. However, the environment will give direction of processes undertaken at a given time and the risks involved. On the other hand most operations have a reference point where the stakeholders can use case studies and statistics available to project hazards associated with specified events. The study will show there are many instances assumed to be safe but they are not.
2.4 How to identify and prioritize hazards
The use of available statistics as the reference point is one way of identifying hazards. We find that there are environments that are risky compare to others. These factors are driven by operations undertaken at a given time. The most common factors that promote hazards are; fire, radioactive emissions, water, and gas emissions. Priority should be given to individuals interacting or are close to such issues. These factors can easily lead to loss of life compared to the others.[Phil Hughes and Ed Ferrett, Introduction To Health And Safety At Work (Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann 2005).]
On the other hand there are some factors that are less hazardous such as noise that should be also addressed. However, all stakeholders should prepare to embrace all impending hazards. This involves training all staff in the organization, whether interacting with the facilities directly or not. The safety of all individuals should be everyone responsibility. Prioritization of hazards will see all facilities marked with signs directing users’ on all hazards that they are likely to face. Some facilities will see restricted access to only a given few specialized experts that understand how the system works like.
2.5How to obtain accurate information on potential factors
Accurate information enables stakeholders to plan and manage their project. There are many sources with accurate information. The health department has records of almost all reported cases dating back to many years. The data can be further researched online too given organizations that keep these records. Hospitals can also serve as a good reference point where they receive patients from many sectors. There are also records available online on various reported hazards.[John R Ridley and John Channing, Safety At Work (Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann 2008).]
The information can be used to analyze hazard priority as it details their nature and also offers statics. You will find that there are those factors that report more hazards than others. The government’s hazard report can also come in useful in finding accurate information. The report analyses hazard in many ways and also recommends ways to reduce and contain these factors. You will find that there are many alternatives to factors that result in hazards. However, there is the issue of cost that comes with using advanced technology that have seen reduced hazard in various operations.
2.6 How to assess the hazards to identify risks
The development process will have many phases that will be thoroughly monitored by all stakeholders in consideration to risks associated in each phase. It is only after the completion of a given phase that the next stage commences. When collaborating with all the stakeholders it is highly likely that there will be many hazards overlooked by the other specialist. The threat to one developer can be a vital operation to a given developer.
The assessment process should be done in consideration of the key stakeholder. In this case it is the clients and system users. The users will be used to test every phase and ensure that they meet their expectations. There is also the need to invite external analysts and specialist that control safety issues from different departments. They will give directions and offer recommendation in case the updated standards are not met. The process should be repeated in every phase and iteratively from the first one to ensure its compatibility.
4.1 How to eliminate identified hazards whilst developing and modify designs
Hazard elimination is to be done when all the stakeholders are present. This will give them information of the changes made. The change can be done by one specialist but it affects the concepts deployed by the other. An example is when there is a structural or infrastructural change. The change translates to enforcement in other phases before or after the one tackled. The difficult task is to ensure that the elimination process does not take the development process behind by demanding more time and finances.[John R Ridley and John Channing, Safety At Work (Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann 2008).]
The change should be made in line with the best alternative that will take into account the time and cost. The supervisor will take the best alternatives recommended by specialist. Occasionally, there is list of alternatives to impending dangers that are outlined in the planning stage. However, conflicting demands will see other stakeholders suffer more than others in terms of resources and time wasted. It is important to select the one that will see all these factors are considered and the quality of the design is not reduced.
4.3 How to give collective measures priority over individual measures when reducing risks
Collective measures cover the safety of all individuals in the organization regardless of their responsibilities whereas individual measures offers priority to a given person or group. The process of giving collective measures a priority should follow the nature of the impending dan...