Essay Available:
You are here: Home → Term Paper → Social Sciences
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
13 Sources
Level:
Vancouver
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Term Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 14.58
Topic:
What is Form Based Planning, and how is it Contrasted to Conventional land use Zoning? (Term Paper Sample)
Instructions:
Land zoning
source..Content:
What is form based planning, and how is it contrasted to conventional land use zoning?
Born during the Industrial Revolution, spread during the Second World War and now matured in the globalized view of the world as a village, land fragmentation and zoning has continued to evolve. Today, it’s at an advanced where the sole goal is tailored towards responding to the ever changing land-use needs. Over time, majority of countries, including Australia, have adopted the two tier-systems where either the form-based approach or the conventional land use zoning is used (3, p.1). Therefore, it is important for both the land users and the implementation team to understand what each system entails and why it suitably merits preferential implementation (2, p4). It is in this respect that this paper explores the both approaches to land zoning, while contrasting their implementation in Australia.
Traditionally, land zoning has been done through segregated approaches depending on the nature of land use, permissibility of property uses and the amount of parametric control of the development intensity (9, p.30). However, as human activities have continued to adaptably change over time, the paradigms of land classification and zoning have equally evolved in response to the evolutionary effect on the environment (6). This has led to the rise of an all-inclusive and innovative approach that allows for effective growth management and controlled land use with the aim of achieving specific urban form mixes (10, p.38). The approach is called form based planning, while the latter is known as the conventional land use zoning technique.
While each of the approach has its pros and cons, modern urban architecture has adopted the form-based zoning approach (9, p.29). Compared to the conventional zoning approach, Wheeler (13) notes that the new approach allow communities meet a wide range of socio-environmental goals of urbanization. As a result, healthier, cleaner and more organized urban environments are flexibly realized. However, if Bohl and Plater-Zyberk’s (11, p.6) argument is anything to go by, the ordinances involved in coming up with a flexible transect is both tedious and highly involving. Nonetheless, as Baker, Sipe and Gleeson (8, p.397) notes, each approach should be effectively evaluated without bias as each town has a unique developmental need.
Conventionally, the traditional zoning approach comprised a rigid development framework that restricted land use and development (11). As a result, the consumer-end was highly restrained to meeting statutory land use and development requirements rather than meeting their personalized needs (4, p.2). However, form-based planning flexibly liberates property developers to creatively meet the consumer-end property development needs. As such, property markets are empowered to innovatively respond to consumer preferences (7, p.4).
Though conventional zoning by land use defined how land was used in a given area, it never fully projected the subtle power of urban planning (13). This is partly because the approach combined privately planned development with non-uniform developmental land use requirements. Resultantly, the zoned land would at times be unprofessionally developed leading to poor urban oriental development (5, p.3). Conversely, modern zoning requires that each land-use activity such as pedestrian walkways and street layouts is professionally designed. Consequently, urban and suburban areas employing the form-based planning approach are more orderly, better organized and well laid out for posterity (1, p.5).
Conclusion
Irrespective of the zoning approach used in planning and regulating urban, metropolitan and regional land use and property development, approach-based considerations should be effectively taken into account. By doing so, the most suitable zoning approach that matches the region’s developmental goals is effectively selected. In essence, this will for obvious reasons involve conducting comparative analysis of each approach, taking case studies of other regions where they have successfully been implemented as well as evaluating and aligning them with the regional development goals. However, as this research establishes, modern urban planning requires innovative approaches to land use and property development; features lacking in the conventional approach but embedded on the form-based planning approach.
Reference list
1 Freestone R. Urban nation: Australia’s plannin...
Born during the Industrial Revolution, spread during the Second World War and now matured in the globalized view of the world as a village, land fragmentation and zoning has continued to evolve. Today, it’s at an advanced where the sole goal is tailored towards responding to the ever changing land-use needs. Over time, majority of countries, including Australia, have adopted the two tier-systems where either the form-based approach or the conventional land use zoning is used (3, p.1). Therefore, it is important for both the land users and the implementation team to understand what each system entails and why it suitably merits preferential implementation (2, p4). It is in this respect that this paper explores the both approaches to land zoning, while contrasting their implementation in Australia.
Traditionally, land zoning has been done through segregated approaches depending on the nature of land use, permissibility of property uses and the amount of parametric control of the development intensity (9, p.30). However, as human activities have continued to adaptably change over time, the paradigms of land classification and zoning have equally evolved in response to the evolutionary effect on the environment (6). This has led to the rise of an all-inclusive and innovative approach that allows for effective growth management and controlled land use with the aim of achieving specific urban form mixes (10, p.38). The approach is called form based planning, while the latter is known as the conventional land use zoning technique.
While each of the approach has its pros and cons, modern urban architecture has adopted the form-based zoning approach (9, p.29). Compared to the conventional zoning approach, Wheeler (13) notes that the new approach allow communities meet a wide range of socio-environmental goals of urbanization. As a result, healthier, cleaner and more organized urban environments are flexibly realized. However, if Bohl and Plater-Zyberk’s (11, p.6) argument is anything to go by, the ordinances involved in coming up with a flexible transect is both tedious and highly involving. Nonetheless, as Baker, Sipe and Gleeson (8, p.397) notes, each approach should be effectively evaluated without bias as each town has a unique developmental need.
Conventionally, the traditional zoning approach comprised a rigid development framework that restricted land use and development (11). As a result, the consumer-end was highly restrained to meeting statutory land use and development requirements rather than meeting their personalized needs (4, p.2). However, form-based planning flexibly liberates property developers to creatively meet the consumer-end property development needs. As such, property markets are empowered to innovatively respond to consumer preferences (7, p.4).
Though conventional zoning by land use defined how land was used in a given area, it never fully projected the subtle power of urban planning (13). This is partly because the approach combined privately planned development with non-uniform developmental land use requirements. Resultantly, the zoned land would at times be unprofessionally developed leading to poor urban oriental development (5, p.3). Conversely, modern zoning requires that each land-use activity such as pedestrian walkways and street layouts is professionally designed. Consequently, urban and suburban areas employing the form-based planning approach are more orderly, better organized and well laid out for posterity (1, p.5).
Conclusion
Irrespective of the zoning approach used in planning and regulating urban, metropolitan and regional land use and property development, approach-based considerations should be effectively taken into account. By doing so, the most suitable zoning approach that matches the region’s developmental goals is effectively selected. In essence, this will for obvious reasons involve conducting comparative analysis of each approach, taking case studies of other regions where they have successfully been implemented as well as evaluating and aligning them with the regional development goals. However, as this research establishes, modern urban planning requires innovative approaches to land use and property development; features lacking in the conventional approach but embedded on the form-based planning approach.
Reference list
1 Freestone R. Urban nation: Australia’s plannin...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
