Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Analysis, Description of the Problem, Population, and Context (Admission Essay Sample)

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Analysis
Student’s name:
Institutional affiliation:
Policy Analysis
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
Description and History of the Legislation
DACA policy referred as 'Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals' is the policy chosen in this essay. Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is a program which temporarily protects immigrants who came to American at their young age without documents. This immigration policy encouraged the people who entered in America whether as minor or even those people who had entered and remained in the country illegally to be given two more years from deportation (Batalova, Hooker, Capps, Bachemeir, and Cox, 2013). This policy also gave them the privilege to work in the country. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy was established in June 2012 during Obama. Thus, the young undocumented immigrants have been called Dreamers since then. Later on, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was terminated in September 2017 by the Trump governance. However multiple states without delay sued to save you the growth, which was in the long run blocked by way of the courts. America branch of hometown security paused the operation of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy on sixteen June 2017 to carry out a thorough audit of the program. After the termination of Operation of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy on fifth September 2017 by President Trump administration, he gave students six months to research about the policy and come up with the appropriate solution (Neil, 2018).
Description of the Problem, Population, and Context
At the root of this problem is how the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is approached. Most people generally see this policy as wrong weather a morally wrong decision or considered as a selfish act to someone. Research indicates that Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program gave job opportunities to several immigrant professionals thus reducing the number the immigrant families living in poverty. The policy also improved the psychological stability of many eligible immigrants and their children (Gonzales, 2014). Economists argued that Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy has no primary unfavorable effects from Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals on local-born people. Fortunately, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is beneficial to the American economic system. The eligible immigrants for this policy should not have any criminal case or any ongoing case in court.
With the legislation of “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” it gives immigrant children a proper education and the opportunity to make goals in life that they can achieve and obtain through that education (Fiflis, 2013). President Trump’s termination of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, before everything blush, flies in the face of popular will. If great grievance became no longer evidence sufficient, public opinion polling indicates a steady and growing supermajority guide for this system and comparable principles. Taking away “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” (DACA) is ripping a child's hopes of a promising future right from their hands ( HYPERLINK "/people/reema-khrais" Reema Khrais, 2018). Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals should be made permanent because it is essential to young immigrants in the United States by providing critical opportunities and uplifting minorities from poverty (Huber, Villanueva, Guarneros, Vélez, and Solórzano, 2014).
People from every aspect of life deserve the ability to pursue their dreams. This is what
Former President Barack Obama believed when he passed the executive order of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Since 2012, over 700,000 people from all around the world have been able to pursue their dreams and regain a sense of security within the United States (Singer and Svajlenka, 2013). Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals is essential to young immigrants and should be made permanent due to the extreme difficulty in obtaining citizenship and the fact that many young people have built a successful life because of this program.
In conclusion, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy should be made permanent because it is essential to young immigrants in the United States by providing essential opportunities and uplifting minorities from poverty. Social work plays an important role when addressing this policy in the realms advocacy and keeping the young immigrant's best interest in mind. The current debate on this policy is questionable and can be improved. Without Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy, our youth immigrants are set up to fail, by dehumanizing immigrants and denying them education and working permits. It is like we are asking them to go down the wrong path. Immigrants also ma...