Crime Prevention, Restorative Justice, and Corrections (Article Sample)

Theoretical best practices for Crime Prevention, Restorative Justice, and Corrections
Student's Name
University Affiliation
Course Number and Name
Instructor's Name
Assignment Due Date
Theoretical best practices for Crime Prevention, Restorative Justice, and Corrections
Introduction
Correctional facilities should use diverse practices for restorative justice, crime prevention, and corrections to advance the criminal justice system. Understanding various theoretical practices can help advance rehabilitative centers in the correctional process. Professionals must evaluate which theoretical approaches are the best effective in helping the system. Integrating the approaches into correctional facilities could be a good way to improve these facilities and meet the needs of both the offender and the victim. Theoretical best practices for crime prevention, restorative justice, and corrections are crucial for the system's effective operation. Restorative approaches include forming virtuous relations among people to build healthy societies and minimize crimes. Crime prevention involves all the strategies and approaches implemented to reduce and deter crime. Corrections are processes conducted in rehabilitative facilities where the lawbreakers go through the process of reformation by incarceration as a form of punishment. Based on an empirical study, it is clear that crime prevention, restorative justice, and corrections practices are meaningfully correlated (Braithwaite, 1999).
Theoretical Practices for Restorative Justice
Restorative justice theoretical best practices can include victim-offender mediation and family group conferencing. Mediation between the offenders and victims brings the two parties together and makes them understand that a conflict can be solved when it is talked about and deliberated about. Therefore, the practice focuses on meeting all the parties involved in the criminal act, reconciling them through an intermediary or trained personnel. The theory of family group conferencing includes a similar idea to restorative justice (Bazemore & Umbreit, 2001). However, group family conferencing involves all the persons that have been affected by the criminal acts. This includes the offender and the victim, friends, and families who meet and share their experiences to inspire one another. Every affected party explains the effects of the crime on their lives. The narrations enable the offenders to learn and realize the effect of their criminal acts on other people's lives within society. According to family group conferencing theory, the victim provides the recommendations and the actions that should be taken against the offender. This approach also proposes that all parties are expected to contribute towards resolving the problem and determining the punishment and action that should be directed at the wrongdoer.
Theoretical practices for Crime Prevention
Crime prevention mechanism is designed to act as an intervention in decreasing cries from the public and criminal propensity or reducing exposure to environments that trigger people to commit crimes. The approach enables to create intervention supplements that aim to reduce harm as a consequence of crime. Therefore, theoretical practices for crime prevention can be strategies that are implemented to deter and decrease crimes. Crime prevention situational theory indicates that crime behaviours result from act alternatives that individuals perceive to be a way out of a situation (Bruinsma et al., 2015). Perception, therefore, connects persons and their surroundings. The theory states that people may consider engaging in a crime because it may seem like the only means out of a particular situation. The criminal act is usually triggered by provocation or temptation in such a case. Therefore, theoretical best practices of crime prevention should consider these factors and conduct an evaluation to determine the chances in which crimes are likely to occur in these types of environments and measures that can be taken to prevent them. Mechanisms should be implemented through research to maintain standardizing of barriers that can stop wrongdoings, diminish personal and social reasons that lead to criminality, and form severe punishment treat amid the general public to discourage crimes. They should also protect vulnerable targets who can become crime victims, reduce crime consequences, and reduce motivators that lead to criminal actions.
Theoretical best practices for Corrections
In the criminal justice system, corrections play a significant role in allowing wrongdoers to transform. In these centers, lawbreakers undergo a process of reformation by incarceration as a punishment. Through incarceration, individuals are disciplined and taken through a learning process that helps in the transformation from crime and becoming better people in society. Correction practices can include a model of change, which outlines the impact of the process on the offender’s life, especially how it influences the criminal behaviour (Griffiths et al., 2018). The practices should also recognize the dynamic risk factors that lead to criminal behaviors among people and address them most effectively. Other best practices can include implementing efficient methods proven scientifically to be effective correctional methods and suitable communication structures so that the offenders can be aware of what is expected of them. The need of enhancing motivation, targeting interventions and matching those interventions with the offender traits during correction should be considered principles that enable reduce recidivism.
Theoretical best practices in the Correctional setting in the United States
In the United States, most correctional centers implement theoretical practices to reform lawbreakers, and these strategies have helped reduce the chances of re-offending when back in society. There are well-stated guidelines on confined persons, especially on the reason that they are in the rehabilitative centers, expectations of their compliance, consequences for non-compliance, and the rewards for compliance. During incarceration, psychologists are also engaged to assist in assessing the risk factors that trigger the wrongdoers to engage in criminal acts. Such valuations enable recognizing criminogenic risks that can be approached to diminish the likelihood of re-offending once the criminal is