4 pages/≈1100 words
Workplace conflict from Language in Thought and Action by Hayakawa (Book Report Sample)
Workplace conflict relating them with the book Language in Thought and Action by Hayakawasource..
Workplace conflict from Language in Thought and Action by Hayakawa
Workplace conflict is a precise type of conflict that happens in workplace. Conflicts can be because to differences of opinion or personality clash about tasks. The workplace conflicts that arise in workplaces may perhaps be shaped by the distinctive aspects of this atmosphere, as well as the long hourâ€™s different people use at their workplace, the difficulties that may be concerned in switching to a different workplace, and the hierarchical structure of the organization. There are so many sources of workplace conflict and from Language in Thought and Action by Hayakawa. Different communication styles can direct to misunderstandings between workers or between worker and manager. Unless staffs understands and accept each otherâ€™s move toward work and conflict will take place, when one or more personnel within a work division are not up to prospective and if this is not addressed, conflict is inevitable.
People who consider themselves as realistic and tough-minded, among them prominent political leaders and businessmen tend to standard that human character is self-centered, and that life is an effort in which simply the fittest may endure. Categorically, most of the time when we pay attention to the noises group make, we are drawing upon the skill of others in order to make up for what we as individual have missed. Clearly the more human being makes use of the nervous systems of another person to supplement his personal, the simple it is for that person to cause conflict. The more persons of course, there are in a setting the more likely they will be in conflict of interest among them by making unhelpful noises at each other, the worst is for all in the restrictions, naturally, of the group's aptitude for social organization p. 11.
An individual, then, is by no means dependent on his own knowledge alone for his information. Consequently, instead of remaining vulnerable because of the boundaries of his own knowledge and experience, instead of realizing out what others have previously discovered, instead of searching the false qualities they explored and duplicate their errors,. This leads to most of the conflicts in workplace, since some do not have the skills needed in a highly competitive society since management believes every employee have the skills to deliver. Therefore, this increases conflict that takes part as the greatest of human beings that makes all other achievements impossible, namely, the conflict experiences in great stores of knowledge, available to all, therefore, Cultural and intellectual conflict is the great challenge of human being life p. 14.
We exist in a highly aggressive society, every person trying to outshine the other in popularity, in wealth, or social prestige. One often says that conflict, is the great governing principle of human life p. 14. But such a philosophy is right, because of all the struggle at the surface, there is an enormous substratum of conflict taken for granted that keeps the human race going. The key point here is that all this conflict is necessary for the operation of society and of necessity accomplished by language or as well it is not attained at all pp. 14-15. It is the essential theory of this book that extensive intraspecific conflict through the use of language is the basic device of human continued existence. A parallel statement will be that when the exercise of language domino effect, as it so regularly does, in the aggravation or creation of conflicts and disagreements, something linguistically is wrong with the speaker, the listener, or both.
Hayakawa discussion about the employ of symbols and their power of creating abstract pyramids of thought, however, he takes us back at some point, verbal communication has to talk about a certain extent in the real world. It makes sense if functional in arguments if the dispute is about things which can not be precise; they are garbage arguments, for they will never be determined. They are supported solely on our inner language assumptions, structures and classifications, either of them are "true" as they canâ€™t be confirmed. Interestingly, Hayakawa imagines that this is the reason why science has made such huge amounts of advancement since scientists are not disturbed with structures that are unverifiable. Systems are helpful if they reflect outcome that can eternity be achieve through experiments. Systems that are helpful are quickly inclined. If social systems are evaluated by effectiveness in obtaining outcome, rather than by impossible to identify scales such as evil or good. Hayakawa consider that society would move onward more quickly.
Symbols and things symbolized are self-determining of each other; however, we all have a way of reaction as if we were essential connections p. 27. Society of a current civilization need more than that normal "common sense" which was described by Stuart Chase as that which informs a person that the world is flat. They are required to be scientifically aware of the limitations and power of symbols, particularly words, if they are to defend them against being determined into complete incomprehension by the difficulty of their semantic setting. The primary principles governing symbols is this: The symbol is NOT the thing symbolized; this at times causes conflict in workplace as some member does no fully understand the word is NOT the thing; the map is NOT the territory it stands for. pp. 29-30.
Hayakawa in Language of Social Cohesion discovers several use of language, including reporting emotions, reporting facts, and others. "The anticipation of silence is itself a...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now: