Divided We Stand: Activism for Women's Rights (Book Review Sample)

Divided We Stand Book Analysis
Student’s Name
Course #: Title
Month 99, YYYY
Table of Contents
Introduction1
Brief Review of Book1
Detailed Analysis 2
Summary of Paper4
Conclusion5
Introduction
Marjorie J. Spruill, a renowned historian, has authored a well-researched, extensive history of the modern-day fight for women's rights and its "important role" in leading the United States to the present turbulent state. Her main emphasis is on the fight prompted by the 1977 National Women's Conference (NWC), which was convened in Houston to commemorate the United Nations' announcement of a "Century for Women". DIVIDED WE STAND uncovers how the fight among women's activists and their moderate challengers separated the country as Democrats kept on supporting ladies' privileges and Republicans cast themselves as the party of family esteems. The women’s privileges development and the moderate ladies' development have irreversibly impacted the course of present day American history. We cannot completely comprehend the present without valuing the occasions paving the way to Houston and from there on.
Brief Review of Book
In Divided We Stand, Marjorie Spruill's exhaustive history of the National Women's Conference of 1977. Also called the NWC, the meeting was brought into the world of a 1975 legislative demonstration that taught delegates "to define objectives for the disposal, everything being equal, without limit and equivalent support of ladies in all parts of American life." Spruill's book appears to be extremely unique with Donald Trump in the White House (Marjorie 2018). Be that as it may, the NWC included individuals and political patterns whose importance is all the more noteworthy given the political race's result. The book subtleties how the meeting incited an unpleasant discussion among women's activists and moderate ladies activists. The subsequent threat, Spruill battles, gushed out over into party governmental issues: "While in the mid 1970s the two Republicans and Democrats upheld the cutting edge ladies' development, by 1980 the GOP had agreed with the other ladies' development, the one that situated family esteems as contrary to ladies' privileges."
Spruill offers significant proof that ladies' freedoms had for some time been a bipartisan reason. The two Republicans and Democrats had embraced section of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) since the 1940s. In 1970, Spruill reports, "Ladies' privileges allies from across the philosophical range and the country over" walked to praise the 50th commemoration of the nineteenth Amendment. The next year, a "kaleidoscope" of ladies from the two players framed the National