Through The Eyes of a Whistleblower (Coursework Sample)

Through The Eyes Of A Whistleblower Author Affiliation Tutor Date Through The Eyes Of A Whistleblower Question 1 Sherry Hunt believes in compassion and empathy. She assists clients in financing their first residences or home refinancing to pay for their children’s college education (Waytz & Kilibarda, 2014). She guarantees that individuals needing a mortgage can use Citigroup’s offerings. Despite the disapproval of certain colleagues over her methods and suggestions at Citibank, Hunt demonstrates her commitment to problem-solving by never giving up on pursuing answers. Hunt is reportedly making repeated attempts to disclose scams and flaws in the mortgages that Citi bought from related lenders, according to Waytz and Kilibarda (2014). In this sense, Hunt is driven mainly by altruism, personal values, and convictions. She never wavers from her upbringing. In this regard, Hunt had a long and prosperous career in the mortgage industry because she worked hard and took pride in adhering to the law. Hunt’s motives and beliefs are essential to individual well-being and organizational success. Maintaining empathy and compassion enables people to view others favorably and to like and trust them. Consequently, making a significant difference in other people’s lives and experiences gives one a sense of comfort. In the meantime, addressing problems allows an individual to take advantage of chances in the surroundings and take charge of their destiny. Hence, the value guarantees that individuals are critical thinkers and productive workers, which improves organizational success. Helping others can result in a stronger sense of meaning at the place of employment and a higher degree of job satisfaction. Meanwhile, personal values are deeply ingrained beliefs that help distinguish between ethical and unethical professional practices. They influence significant life decisions and career choices. Employers should support and encourage staff members to express and uphold their workplace moral principles. Employee voice, according to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (2022), is how individuals express their opinions to their employer and impact decisions that affect them at the workplace. Employers benefit from a compelling voice because it fosters employee trust, creativity, efficiency, and organizational advancement. When workers express themselves verbally, they frequently feel more appreciated at work, have more influence, have better career chances, and feel more respected. To create inclusive workplaces, employee voice is crucial. Question 2 Instead of giving in to pressure, if I had been Hunt, I would have launched a whistleblower case against Citigroup and the parent company of Citigroup. I would use the False Claim Act to bring up this lawsuit against Citigroup. A whistleblower statute known as the False Claims Act enables private persons to bring legal action against any people, businesses, or other organizations defrauding the government and can obtain penalties and damages on that body’s behalf (U.S. Department of Justice, 2023). The law shields whistleblowers from retaliation at work and offers them financial benefits. In this instance, the mortgage lender purposefully disregarded mistakes and fraud in the government-insured mortgage schemes. For example, any loan that omits HUD-1 should be denied according to federal criteria. Hunt was overruled, though, by the quality rebuttal committee, which claimed that HUD-1 could not be used to decide whether a loan was defective and authorized file without HUD-1 for FHA insurance. Corporate fraud describes any unethical, unlawful, or deceitful acts carried out by a company or someone working for a firm. Corporate fraud strategies are frequently exceedingly intricate, making them challenging to detect. Typically, internal audit findings, anonymous tips, suspicions, complaints, whistleblowers, or allegations lead to the discovery of corporate fraud. Regardless of the source, allegations of fraud are typically well-founded, but it frequently takes months for a team of forensic accountants to dissect a corporate fraud plan thoroughly. In this sense, I would persuade the U.S. Department of Justice to take part in the lawsuit and provide them with an email containing all of the errors and frauds at Citi. Since the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the primary organization looking into corporate fraud, I would also follow up with an email on my previous reporting. The FBI should concentrate its resources on investigations involving corporate executives’ fraud and accounting frauds and instances involving obstruction of justice. Question 3 Hi there! I appreciate your thoughts. I want to respond to your concerns, which I appreciate. First, let me reassure you that I have carefully considered and examined the suggested course of action. After weighing the advantages and disadvantages, I have decided this is the most beneficial course for the reasons listed below. Citi is flagrantly fabricating information. Individuals found guilty of fraud may face legal action, heavy fines, reputational damage, and even incarceration if the deception is found. We will probably be held accountable, along with other management personnel, for hiding Citi’s willful fabrication of the truth. Citi’s management frequently retaliate against whistleblowers in the company. In 2008, I went from supervising 65 workers to 1, and Bowen lost his underwriting responsibilities. He was left to supervise two employees, down from two hundred in his pre...